Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2010

01-05-2010 | Original Article

The clinical utility of oral glucose tolerance test at term: can it predict fetal macrosomia?

Authors: Ossie Geifman-Holtzman, Ronit Machtinger, Michail Spiliopoulos, Eyal Schiff, Nira Koren-Morag, Mordechai Dulitzki

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to assess the correlation between true fetal macrosomia and abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in pregnant women at term gestation who had a negative glucose challenge screen (GCT) at 24–28 weeks.

Study design

In this cohort observational study, we enrolled all term pregnant patients who presented to our antenatal unit with estimated fetal weight >90th percentile (or >4,000 g) and negative 50 g GCT. The women underwent a 3-h (100 g) OGTT test. Patient’s demographics, GCT and OGTT test results, mode of delivery and pregnancy outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results

One hundred and seventy women (mean age 30.2 + 4.6 years, range 19–44) were recruited over 15-month period. Ten patients (5.9%) were identified as having impaired glucose metabolism at term. In this sub-group, we found no correlation between GCT values at 24–28 weeks, family history of diabetes mellitus, the patient’s BMI or weight at term, and the diagnosis of impaired glucose metabolism. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean fetal weight in patients with normal and abnormal OGTT. No shoulder dystocia or third and fourth degree vaginal tears were reported among the women with suspected fetal macrosomia and impaired glucose metabolism.

Conclusions

There was no correlation between true fetal macrosomia and an abnormal 3-h (100 g) OGTT at term. A larger-scale study is needed to determine the clinical significance of performing an OGTT at term for all patients with macrosomia and negative gestational diabetes screen.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Combs CA, Gunderson E, Kitzmiller JL, Gavin LA, Main EK (1992) Relationship of fetal macrosomia to maternal postprandial glucose control during pregnancy. Diabetes Care 15(10):1251–1257CrossRefPubMed Combs CA, Gunderson E, Kitzmiller JL, Gavin LA, Main EK (1992) Relationship of fetal macrosomia to maternal postprandial glucose control during pregnancy. Diabetes Care 15(10):1251–1257CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Van Assche FA, Holemans K, Aerts L (2001) Long-term consequences for offspring of diabetes during pregnancy. Br Med Bull 60:173–182 ReviewCrossRefPubMed Van Assche FA, Holemans K, Aerts L (2001) Long-term consequences for offspring of diabetes during pregnancy. Br Med Bull 60:173–182 ReviewCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW (1991) Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighting >4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:831–837PubMed Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW (1991) Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighting >4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:831–837PubMed
4.
go back to reference Brody SC, Harris R, Lohr K (2003) Screening for gestational diabetes: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Obstet Gynecol 101:380–392CrossRefPubMed Brody SC, Harris R, Lohr K (2003) Screening for gestational diabetes: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Obstet Gynecol 101:380–392CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA (1985) Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 66:762PubMed Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA (1985) Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 66:762PubMed
6.
go back to reference Conway DL, Langer O (1997) Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. AJOG 178(3):922–925 Conway DL, Langer O (1997) Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries. AJOG 178(3):922–925
7.
go back to reference Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N, Meurer B, Müller A, Dathe O (2008) Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med 29(2):159–164CrossRefPubMed Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N, Meurer B, Müller A, Dathe O (2008) Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med 29(2):159–164CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gabbe SG (1986) Gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 315:1025–1026PubMed Gabbe SG (1986) Gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 315:1025–1026PubMed
9.
go back to reference Danilenko-Dixon DR, Van Winter JT, Nelson RL, Ogburn PL Jr (1999) Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:798–802CrossRefPubMed Danilenko-Dixon DR, Van Winter JT, Nelson RL, Ogburn PL Jr (1999) Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:798–802CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sermer M, Naylor CD, Farine D (1998) The Toronto Tri-Hospital gestational diabetes project: a preliminary review. Diabetes Care 21(Suppl 2):B33–B42PubMed Sermer M, Naylor CD, Farine D (1998) The Toronto Tri-Hospital gestational diabetes project: a preliminary review. Diabetes Care 21(Suppl 2):B33–B42PubMed
11.
go back to reference Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E et al (1996) Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance pathophysiology or practice style? JAMA 275(15):1165–1170CrossRefPubMed Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E et al (1996) Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance pathophysiology or practice style? JAMA 275(15):1165–1170CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shirazian N, Emdadi R, Mahboubi M, Motevallian A, Fazel-Sarjuei Z, Sedighpour N et al (2009) Screening for gestational diabetes: usefulness of clinical risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet (in press) Shirazian N, Emdadi R, Mahboubi M, Motevallian A, Fazel-Sarjuei Z, Sedighpour N et al (2009) Screening for gestational diabetes: usefulness of clinical risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet (in press)
13.
go back to reference Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Zinman B, Hanley AJ (2009) Comparison of National Diabetes Data Group and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in their identification of postpartum risk of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (in press) Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Sermer M, Connelly PW, Zinman B, Hanley AJ (2009) Comparison of National Diabetes Data Group and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in their identification of postpartum risk of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (in press)
14.
go back to reference Sacks D, Abu-Fadil S, Greenspoon JB, Fotheringham N (1989) Do the current standards for glucose tolerance testing in pregnancy represent a valid conversion of O’Sullivan original criteria? Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:638–641PubMed Sacks D, Abu-Fadil S, Greenspoon JB, Fotheringham N (1989) Do the current standards for glucose tolerance testing in pregnancy represent a valid conversion of O’Sullivan original criteria? Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:638–641PubMed
15.
go back to reference Magee MS, Walden CE, Benedetti TJ, Knopp RH (1993) Influence of diagnostic criteria on the incidence of gestational diabetes and perinatal morbidity. JAMA 269:609–615CrossRefPubMed Magee MS, Walden CE, Benedetti TJ, Knopp RH (1993) Influence of diagnostic criteria on the incidence of gestational diabetes and perinatal morbidity. JAMA 269:609–615CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E (1963) Intrauterine growth as estimated from live born birth-weight data at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 32:793PubMed Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E (1963) Intrauterine growth as estimated from live born birth-weight data at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 32:793PubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Langer O, Brustman L, Anyaegbunam A, Mazze R (1987) The significance of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value and adverse outcome in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157(3):758–763PubMed Langer O, Brustman L, Anyaegbunam A, Mazze R (1987) The significance of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value and adverse outcome in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157(3):758–763PubMed
19.
go back to reference National Diabetes Data Group (1979) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28:1039–1057 National Diabetes Data Group (1979) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28:1039–1057
20.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins (2001) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 30, September 2001 (replaces technical bulletin number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 98:525–538 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins (2001) ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 30, September 2001 (replaces technical bulletin number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 98:525–538
21.
go back to reference Ecker JL (2004) Cesarean delivery for suspected macrosomia: inefficient at best. Clin Obstet Gynecol 47:352–364CrossRefPubMed Ecker JL (2004) Cesarean delivery for suspected macrosomia: inefficient at best. Clin Obstet Gynecol 47:352–364CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ostlund I, Hanson U (2003) Occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus and the value of different screening indicators for the oral glucose tolerance test. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:103–108CrossRefPubMed Ostlund I, Hanson U (2003) Occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus and the value of different screening indicators for the oral glucose tolerance test. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:103–108CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Agarwal MM, Hughes PF, Punnose J, Ezimokhait M (2000) Fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic, high risk population. Diabet Med 17(10):720–726 Agarwal MM, Hughes PF, Punnose J, Ezimokhait M (2000) Fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic, high risk population. Diabet Med 17(10):720–726
24.
go back to reference Williams J, Watson F (1989) Serial changes in the 50-g oral glucose test in pregnancy: implications for screening. Obstet Gynecol 74(1):40 Williams J, Watson F (1989) Serial changes in the 50-g oral glucose test in pregnancy: implications for screening. Obstet Gynecol 74(1):40
25.
go back to reference Sacks DB (1997) Implications of the revised criteria for diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 43:2230–2232PubMed Sacks DB (1997) Implications of the revised criteria for diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 43:2230–2232PubMed
Metadata
Title
The clinical utility of oral glucose tolerance test at term: can it predict fetal macrosomia?
Authors
Ossie Geifman-Holtzman
Ronit Machtinger
Michail Spiliopoulos
Eyal Schiff
Nira Koren-Morag
Mordechai Dulitzki
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1160-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2010 Go to the issue