Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Commentary

The challenge of benchmarking health systems: is ICT innovation capacity more systemic than organizational dependent?

Author: Luís Velez Lapão

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The article by Catan et al. presents a benchmarking exercise comparing Israel and Portugal on the implementation of Information and Communication Technologies in the healthcare sector. Special attention was given to e-Health and m-Health. The authors collected information via a set of interviews with key stakeholders. They compared two different cultures and societies, which have reached slightly different implementation outcomes. Although the comparison is very enlightening, it is also challenging.
Benchmarking exercises present a set of challenges, such as the choice of methodologies and the assessment of the impact on organizational strategy. Precise benchmarking methodology is a valid tool for eliciting information about alternatives for improving health systems. However, many beneficial interventions, which benchmark as effective, fail to translate into meaningful healthcare outcomes across contexts. There is a relationship between results and the innovational and competitive environments.
Differences in healthcare governance and financing models are well known; but little is known about their impact on Information and Communication Technology implementation. The article by Catan et al. provides interesting clues about this issue. Public systems (such as those of Portugal, UK, Sweden, Spain, etc.) present specific advantages and disadvantages concerning Information and Communication Technology development and implementation. Meanwhile, private systems based fundamentally on insurance packages, (such as Israel, Germany, Netherlands or USA) present a different set of advantages and disadvantages - especially a more open context for innovation.
Challenging issues from both the Portuguese and Israeli cases will be addressed. Clearly, more research is needed on both benchmarking methodologies and on ICT implementation strategies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Catan G, Espanha R, Mendes RV, Toren O, Chinitz D. The impact of ehealth and mhealth on doctor behavior and patient involvement: an Israeli and Portuguese comparative approach. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2014;4:41.CrossRef Catan G, Espanha R, Mendes RV, Toren O, Chinitz D. The impact of ehealth and mhealth on doctor behavior and patient involvement: an Israeli and Portuguese comparative approach. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2014;4:41.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goh S, Richards G. Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. Euro Manag J. 1997;15(5):575–83.CrossRef Goh S, Richards G. Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. Euro Manag J. 1997;15(5):575–83.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gomes R, Lapão LV. The adoption of IT security standards in a healthcare environment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:765.PubMed Gomes R, Lapão LV. The adoption of IT security standards in a healthcare environment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:765.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lapão LV. Survey on the Status of the Hospital Information Systems in Portugal. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46:493–9. Lapão LV. Survey on the Status of the Hospital Information Systems in Portugal. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46:493–9.
5.
go back to reference Gomes P, Lapão LV. The role of a nation-wide information system in improving the access to surgery in Portugal. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:71–5.PubMed Gomes P, Lapão LV. The role of a nation-wide information system in improving the access to surgery in Portugal. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:71–5.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. British Med J. 2001;323(7313):625.CrossRef Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. British Med J. 2001;323(7313):625.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(1):22–31.CrossRefPubMed Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(1):22–31.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapao L, Wurst SHR. Expanding the scope of health information systems-from hospitals to regional networks, to national infrastructures, and beyond. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(4):500–2.PubMed Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapao L, Wurst SHR. Expanding the scope of health information systems-from hospitals to regional networks, to national infrastructures, and beyond. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(4):500–2.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMed Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 suppl 1:35–48.CrossRefPubMed Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 suppl 1:35–48.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Seto E. Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008;14(7):679–86.CrossRefPubMed Seto E. Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008;14(7):679–86.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Syverson, C. What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature. 2011;49:(2)326–365 Syverson, C. What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature. 2011;49:(2)326–365 
14.
go back to reference Vives X. Innovation and Competitive Pressure*. J Indust Econ. 2008;56(3):419–69.CrossRef Vives X. Innovation and Competitive Pressure*. J Indust Econ. 2008;56(3):419–69.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR trap—the future of health IT. New Eng J Med. 2012;366(24):2240–2.CrossRefPubMed Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR trap—the future of health IT. New Eng J Med. 2012;366(24):2240–2.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The challenge of benchmarking health systems: is ICT innovation capacity more systemic than organizational dependent?
Author
Luís Velez Lapão
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0036-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015 Go to the issue