Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018

Open Access 01-01-2018 | Original Article

Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before colostomy takedown improves the postoperative outcomes

Authors: Wan-Hsiang Hu, Ko-Chao Lee, Kai-Lung Tsai, Hong-Hwa Chen

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Temporary loop colostomy is a common surgical procedure used to avoid complications in high-risk distal anastomosis as well as pelvic inflammation. Issues regarding postoperative outcomes of colostomy takedown have been widely discussed in the literature, wound infection especially. Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before takedown was adopted in our study, which provided excellent traction to aid mobilization of stomy and avoided stool spillage to downgrade the wound classification to “clean contamination.” We aimed to determine the effects of the procedure on postoperative outcomes.

Methods

This was a prospective case-control study at a single tertiary medical center. Patients presenting for elective colostomy takedown were included. Allis clamp (n = 50) or silk suture (n = 60) was applied to mobilize the colostomy, and results were compared. Operative time and wound infection rate were measured as primary postoperative outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to demonstrate the association between the two groups and outcomes.

Results

In univariate analyses, significantly shorter operative time (median = 57 min, p = 0.003) and lower postoperative wound infection rate (3%, p = 0.03) were noted in the group receiving silk suture. Multivariate analyses results showed that silk suture was significantly associated with both operative time (B = − 8.5, p = 0.01) and wound infection (odds ratio = 0.18, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

With the advantage of enhancing traction and decreasing contamination, the temporary closure of colostomy with suture improved takedown outcomes, including a shorter operative time and lower wound infection rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D, Selvindoss P, Vukasin P, Ault G et al (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12:437–441CrossRefPubMed Kaiser AM, Israelit S, Klaristenfeld D, Selvindoss P, Vukasin P, Ault G et al (2008) Morbidity of ostomy takedown. J Gastrointest Surg 12:437–441CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358CrossRefPubMed Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMed Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472CrossRefPubMed Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gu WL, Wu SW (2015) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies. World J Surg Oncol 13:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gu WL, Wu SW (2015) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies. World J Surg Oncol 13:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363CrossRefPubMed Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708CrossRefPubMed Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 31:1142–1151CrossRefPubMed Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 31:1142–1151CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McCartan DP, Burke JP, Walsh SR, Coffey JC (2013) Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 17:345–351CrossRefPubMed McCartan DP, Burke JP, Walsh SR, Coffey JC (2013) Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 17:345–351CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mirbagheri N, Dark J, Skinner S (2013) Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates. Tech Coloproctol 17:215–220CrossRefPubMed Mirbagheri N, Dark J, Skinner S (2013) Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates. Tech Coloproctol 17:215–220CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mileski WJ, Rege RV, Joehl RJ, Nahrwold DL (1990) Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:17–21PubMed Mileski WJ, Rege RV, Joehl RJ, Nahrwold DL (1990) Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:17–21PubMed
12.
go back to reference Harold DM, Johnson EK, Rizzo JA, Steele SR (2010) Primary closure of stoma site wounds after ostomy takedown. Am J Surg 199:621–624CrossRefPubMed Harold DM, Johnson EK, Rizzo JA, Steele SR (2010) Primary closure of stoma site wounds after ostomy takedown. Am J Surg 199:621–624CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Berger RL, Arita NA et al (2014) Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:406–416CrossRef Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Berger RL, Arita NA et al (2014) Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Color Dis 16:406–416CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Camacho-Mauries D, Rodriguez-Diaz JL, Salgado-Nesme N, Gonzalez QH, Vergara-Fernandez O (2013) Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection. Dis Colon Rectum 56:205–211CrossRefPubMed Camacho-Mauries D, Rodriguez-Diaz JL, Salgado-Nesme N, Gonzalez QH, Vergara-Fernandez O (2013) Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection. Dis Colon Rectum 56:205–211CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee JT, Marquez TT, Clerc D, Gie O, Demartines N, Madoff RD et al (2014) Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1282–1289CrossRefPubMed Lee JT, Marquez TT, Clerc D, Gie O, Demartines N, Madoff RD et al (2014) Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1282–1289CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Geng HZ, Nasier D, Liu B, Gao H, Xu YK (2015) Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:494–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geng HZ, Nasier D, Liu B, Gao H, Xu YK (2015) Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:494–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondegui OD (2015) How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 220:550–558CrossRefPubMed Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondegui OD (2015) How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 220:550–558CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Liang MK, Li LT, Avellaneda A, Moffett JM, Hicks SC, Awad SS (2013) Outcomes and predictors of incisional surgical site infection in stoma reversal. JAMA Surg 148:183–189CrossRefPubMed Liang MK, Li LT, Avellaneda A, Moffett JM, Hicks SC, Awad SS (2013) Outcomes and predictors of incisional surgical site infection in stoma reversal. JAMA Surg 148:183–189CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Farnworth LR, Lemay DE, Wooldridge T, Mabrey JD, Blaschak MJ, DeCoster TA et al (2001) A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room. Iowa Orthop J 21:31–35PubMedPubMedCentral Farnworth LR, Lemay DE, Wooldridge T, Mabrey JD, Blaschak MJ, DeCoster TA et al (2001) A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room. Iowa Orthop J 21:31–35PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, Rattner DW, Hutter MM (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288–2295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, Rattner DW, Hutter MM (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288–2295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Bailey MB, Davenport DL, Vargas HD, Evers BM, McKenzie SP (2014) Longer operative time: deterioration of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:616–622CrossRefPubMed Bailey MB, Davenport DL, Vargas HD, Evers BM, McKenzie SP (2014) Longer operative time: deterioration of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:616–622CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li LT, Brahmbhatt R, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Berger DH, Liang MK (2014) Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study. Dig Surg 31:73–78CrossRefPubMed Li LT, Brahmbhatt R, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Berger DH, Liang MK (2014) Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study. Dig Surg 31:73–78CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hsieh MC, Kuo LT, Chi CC, Huang WS, Chin CC (2015) Pursestring closure versus conventional primary closure following stoma reversal to reduce surgical site infection rate: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 58:808–815CrossRefPubMed Hsieh MC, Kuo LT, Chi CC, Huang WS, Chin CC (2015) Pursestring closure versus conventional primary closure following stoma reversal to reduce surgical site infection rate: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 58:808–815CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B, Smith SR (2010) Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 97:1511–1517CrossRefPubMed Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B, Smith SR (2010) Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 97:1511–1517CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dusch N, Goranova D, Herrle F, Niedergethmann M, Kienle P (2013) Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture. Color Dis 15:1033–1040CrossRef Dusch N, Goranova D, Herrle F, Niedergethmann M, Kienle P (2013) Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture. Color Dis 15:1033–1040CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L et al (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 24:479–488CrossRef Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L et al (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 24:479–488CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wada Y, Miyoshi N, Ohue M, Noura S, Fujino S, Sugimura K et al (2015) Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: a retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal. Mol Clin Oncol 3:619–622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wada Y, Miyoshi N, Ohue M, Noura S, Fujino S, Sugimura K et al (2015) Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: a retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal. Mol Clin Oncol 3:619–622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Green JW, Wenzel RP (1977) Postoperative wound infection: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Ann Surg 185:264–268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Green JW, Wenzel RP (1977) Postoperative wound infection: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Ann Surg 185:264–268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect 10:539–544CrossRef Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect 10:539–544CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Marquez TT, Christoforidis D, Abraham A, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA (2010) Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture. World J Surg 34:2877–2882CrossRefPubMed Marquez TT, Christoforidis D, Abraham A, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA (2010) Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture. World J Surg 34:2877–2882CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Csikesz NG, Nguyen LN, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2009) Nationwide volume and mortality after elective surgery in cirrhotic patients. J Am Coll Surg 208:96–103CrossRefPubMed Csikesz NG, Nguyen LN, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2009) Nationwide volume and mortality after elective surgery in cirrhotic patients. J Am Coll Surg 208:96–103CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Han EC, Ryoo SB, Park JW, Yi JW, HK O, Choe EK et al (2017) Oncologic and surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity-matched study. PLoS One 12:e0178920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han EC, Ryoo SB, Park JW, Yi JW, HK O, Choe EK et al (2017) Oncologic and surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity-matched study. PLoS One 12:e0178920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Spier BJ, Fayyad AA, Lucey MR, Johnson EA, Wojtowycz M, Rikkers L et al (2008) Bleeding stomal varices: case series and systematic review of the literature. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:346–352CrossRefPubMed Spier BJ, Fayyad AA, Lucey MR, Johnson EA, Wojtowycz M, Rikkers L et al (2008) Bleeding stomal varices: case series and systematic review of the literature. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:346–352CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Shreiner A, Dasika NL, Sharma P (2013) Lower GI bleeding in a patient with cirrhosis and history of colorectal cancer. Peristomal varices secondary to portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 145:e3–e4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shreiner A, Dasika NL, Sharma P (2013) Lower GI bleeding in a patient with cirrhosis and history of colorectal cancer. Peristomal varices secondary to portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 145:e3–e4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Schreinemacher MH, Vijgen GH, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen JG, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146:94–99CrossRefPubMed Schreinemacher MH, Vijgen GH, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen JG, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146:94–99CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011) Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 146:1191–1196CrossRefPubMed Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011) Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg 146:1191–1196CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before colostomy takedown improves the postoperative outcomes
Authors
Wan-Hsiang Hu
Ko-Chao Lee
Kai-Lung Tsai
Hong-Hwa Chen
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2934-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018 Go to the issue