Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article

Harvest of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer depends on demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients

Authors: Shu-Kay Ng, Cu-Tai Lu, Sahar Pakneshan, Melissa Leung, Simon Siu, Alfred King-yin Lam

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to study the impact of clinical factors on the lymph node sampling in a large cohort of patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

A colorectal cancer database of 2298 patients in Queensland, Australia, was established. Zero-inflated regression method was used to model positive lymph node counts given the number of lymph nodes examined, with patient’s demographic and clinical factors as covariates in the model. Sensitivity and survival analyses were performed to illustrate the applicability of the recommendation of the minimum number of lymph nodes need to be pathologically examined.

Results

Younger patients with a larger sized tumour located at the left colon or rectum require fewer lymph nodes to be pathologically examined. Overall, 45.9% of the patients require eight or nine lymph nodes and 31.5% needs ten or 11 lymph nodes to be harvested for pathological examination. A simple formula could be used to obtain the minimum number of lymph node sampling required in patients with colorectal cancer based on patients’ age as well as site and dimension of the cancer.

Conclusions

The findings provide practical information about that the minimum number of lymph nodes that could be harvested at the time of collection of lymph nodes for pathological examination for patients with colorectal cancer. The minimum number of lymph nodes harvested depends on demographic (age) and clinical (location and dimension of cancer) characteristics of the patients with colorectal cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Bosman FT, Boffetta P et al (2010) Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC, Lyon, pp 134–146 Hamilton SR, Bosman FT, Boffetta P et al (2010) Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC, Lyon, pp 134–146
2.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Fazio VW, Lavery I, Hammel J (2011) Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma: is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol 18:405–412CrossRefPubMed Stocchi L, Fazio VW, Lavery I, Hammel J (2011) Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma: is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol 18:405–412CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, Dent O, Gathright B, Hardcastle JD et al (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an international documentation system (IDS) and an international comprehensive anatomical terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344CrossRefPubMed Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, Dent O, Gathright B, Hardcastle JD et al (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an international documentation system (IDS) and an international comprehensive anatomical terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Miller ED, Robb BW, Cummings OW, Johnstone PA (2012) The effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1002–1007CrossRefPubMed Miller ED, Robb BW, Cummings OW, Johnstone PA (2012) The effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1002–1007CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610PubMedPubMedCentral Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Denham LJ, Kerstetter JC, Herrmann PC (2012) The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:342–352PubMedPubMedCentral Denham LJ, Kerstetter JC, Herrmann PC (2012) The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 3:342–352PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179–189CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T (2002) Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 81:63–69CrossRefPubMed Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T (2002) Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 81:63–69CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ng SK (2015) A two-way clustering framework to identify disparities in multimorbidity patterns of mental and physical health conditions among Australians. Stat Med 34:3444–3460CrossRefPubMed Ng SK (2015) A two-way clustering framework to identify disparities in multimorbidity patterns of mental and physical health conditions among Australians. Stat Med 34:3444–3460CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Stanisavljević L, Søndenaa K, Storli KE, Leh S, Nesvik I, Gudlaugsson E et al (2014) The total number of lymph nodes in resected colon cancer specimens is affected by several factors but the lymph node ratio is independent of these. APMIS 122:490–498CrossRefPubMed Stanisavljević L, Søndenaa K, Storli KE, Leh S, Nesvik I, Gudlaugsson E et al (2014) The total number of lymph nodes in resected colon cancer specimens is affected by several factors but the lymph node ratio is independent of these. APMIS 122:490–498CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Storli K, Søndenaa K, Furnes B, Leh S, Nesvik I, Bru T et al (2011) Improved lymph node harvest from resected colon cancer specimens did not cause upstaging from TNM stage II to III. World J Surg 35:2796–2803CrossRefPubMed Storli K, Søndenaa K, Furnes B, Leh S, Nesvik I, Bru T et al (2011) Improved lymph node harvest from resected colon cancer specimens did not cause upstaging from TNM stage II to III. World J Surg 35:2796–2803CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, Witte BI, van Dekken H (2015) Which lymph nodes contain metastases in colon cancer patients? A retrospective histopathological evaluation of 156 patients. Int J Surg Pathol 23:623–628CrossRefPubMed da Costa DW, Vrouenraets BC, Witte BI, van Dekken H (2015) Which lymph nodes contain metastases in colon cancer patients? A retrospective histopathological evaluation of 156 patients. Int J Surg Pathol 23:623–628CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Harvest of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer depends on demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients
Authors
Shu-Kay Ng
Cu-Tai Lu
Sahar Pakneshan
Melissa Leung
Simon Siu
Alfred King-yin Lam
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2927-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018 Go to the issue