Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Telemedicine | Research

Experiences with telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions: the views of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Authors: Susanna Sten-Gahmberg, Kine Pedersen, Ingrid Gaarder Harsheim, Hanna Isabel Løyland, Birgit Abelsen

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Telemedicine is often promoted as a possible solution to some of the challenges healthcare systems in many countries face, and an increasing number of studies evaluate the clinical effects. So far, the studies show varying results. Less attention has been paid to systemic factors, such as the context, implementation, and mechanisms of these interventions.

Methods

This study evaluates the experiences of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions with usual care. Patients in the intervention group received an individual treatment plan together with computer tablets and home telemonitoring devices to report point-of-care measurements, e.g., blood pressure, blood glucose or oxygen saturation, and to respond to health related questions reported to a follow-up service. In response to abnormal measurement results, a follow-up service nurse would contact the patient and consider relevant actions. We conducted 49 interviews with patients and 77 interviews with health personnel and managers at the local centers. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis and based on recommendations for conducting process evaluation, considering three core aspects within the process of delivering a complex intervention: (1) context, (2) implementation, and (3) mechanisms of impact.

Results

Patients were mainly satisfied with the telemedicine-based service, and experienced increased safety and understanding of their symptoms and illness. Implementation of the service does, however, require dedicated resources over time. Slow adjustment of other healthcare providers may have contributed to the absence of reductions in the use of specialized healthcare and general practitioner (GP) services. An evident advantage of the service is its flexibility, yet this may also challenge cost-efficiency of the intervention.

Conclusions

The implementation of a telemedicine-based service in primary healthcare is a complex process that is sensitive to contextual factors and that requires time and dedicated resources to ensure successful implementation.

Trial registration

The trial was registered in www.​clinicaltrials.​gov (NCT04142710). Study start: 2019-02-09, Study completion: 2021-06-30, Study type: Interventional, Intervention/treatment: Telemedicine tablet and tools to perform measurements. Informed and documented consent was obtained from all subjects and next of kin participating in the study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Leonardsen AL, Hardeland C, Helgesen AK, Grøndahl VA. Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings- a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:779.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leonardsen AL, Hardeland C, Helgesen AK, Grøndahl VA. Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings- a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:779.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Jennett P, Yeo M, Pauls M, Graham J. Organizational readiness for telemedicine: implications for success and failure. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(Suppl 2):27–30.CrossRef Jennett P, Yeo M, Pauls M, Graham J. Organizational readiness for telemedicine: implications for success and failure. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(Suppl 2):27–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:4–12.CrossRefPubMed Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:4–12.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e16407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e16407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Jain SR, Sui Y, Ng CH, Chen ZX, Goh LH, Shorey S. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237647.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jain SR, Sui Y, Ng CH, Chen ZX, Goh LH, Shorey S. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237647.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Tadas S, Coyle D. Barriers to and facilitators of technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: systematic qualitative grounded theory review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tadas S, Coyle D. Barriers to and facilitators of technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: systematic qualitative grounded theory review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Thomas EE, Taylor ML, Banbury A, Snoswell CL, Haydon HM, Gallegos Rejas VM, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e051844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas EE, Taylor ML, Banbury A, Snoswell CL, Haydon HM, Gallegos Rejas VM, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e051844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Tchero H, Kangambega P, Briatte C, Brunet-Houdard S, Retali GR, Rusch E. Clinical effectiveness of Telemedicine in Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis of 42 randomized controlled trials. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25:569–83.CrossRefPubMed Tchero H, Kangambega P, Briatte C, Brunet-Houdard S, Retali GR, Rusch E. Clinical effectiveness of Telemedicine in Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis of 42 randomized controlled trials. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25:569–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barbosa MT, Sousa CS, Morais-Almeida M, Simões MJ, Mendes P. Telemedicine in COPD: an overview by topics. Copd. 2020;17:601–17.CrossRefPubMed Barbosa MT, Sousa CS, Morais-Almeida M, Simões MJ, Mendes P. Telemedicine in COPD: an overview by topics. Copd. 2020;17:601–17.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gaveikaite V, Grundstrom C, Winter S, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. A systematic map and in-depth review of European telehealth interventions efficacy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2019:78–88. Gaveikaite V, Grundstrom C, Winter S, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. A systematic map and in-depth review of European telehealth interventions efficacy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2019:78–88.
13.
go back to reference Kreaf C, van der Meirschen M, Free C. Digital telemedicine interventions for patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020. Kreaf C, van der Meirschen M, Free C. Digital telemedicine interventions for patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020.
14.
go back to reference Massoudi B, Floor H, Bockting C, Burger H, Blanker M. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019:728–43. Massoudi B, Floor H, Bockting C, Burger H, Blanker M. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019:728–43.
15.
go back to reference Timpel P, Oswald S, Schwarz PEH, Harst L. Mapping the evidence on the effectiveness of Telemedicine interventions in Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and hypertension: an Umbrella Review of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e16791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Timpel P, Oswald S, Schwarz PEH, Harst L. Mapping the evidence on the effectiveness of Telemedicine interventions in Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and hypertension: an Umbrella Review of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e16791.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Flumignan CDQ, Rocha APD, Pinto A, Milby KMM, Batista MR, Atallah ÁN, et al. What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about telemedicine for healthcare? Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:184–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flumignan CDQ, Rocha APD, Pinto A, Milby KMM, Batista MR, Atallah ÁN, et al. What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about telemedicine for healthcare? Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:184–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Zuidgeest MGP, Goetz I, Groenwold RHH, Irving E, van Thiel GJMW, Grobbee DE. Series: pragmatic trials and real world evidence: paper 1. Introduction J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;88:7–13.CrossRefPubMed Zuidgeest MGP, Goetz I, Groenwold RHH, Irving E, van Thiel GJMW, Grobbee DE. Series: pragmatic trials and real world evidence: paper 1. Introduction J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;88:7–13.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Abelsen B, Godager G, Harsheim I, Iversen T, Kristiansen I, Løyland H, et al. Evaluering av utprøving av digital hjemmeoppfølging: Sluttrapport. Rapport 2022_1. Oslo: Oslo Economics; 2022. Abelsen B, Godager G, Harsheim I, Iversen T, Kristiansen I, Løyland H, et al. Evaluering av utprøving av digital hjemmeoppfølging: Sluttrapport. Rapport 2022_1. Oslo: Oslo Economics; 2022.
21.
go back to reference Sten-Gahmberg S, Pedersen K, Harsheim I, Løyland H, Snilsberg Ø, Iversen T et al. Pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing a complex telemedicine-based intervention with usual care in patients with chronic conditions. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01664-w Sten-Gahmberg S, Pedersen K, Harsheim I, Løyland H, Snilsberg Ø, Iversen T et al. Pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing a complex telemedicine-based intervention with usual care in patients with chronic conditions. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10198-023-01664-w
22.
go back to reference French C, Pinnock H, Forbes G, Skene I, Taylor SJC. Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?-a systematic review. Trials. 2020;21:916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral French C, Pinnock H, Forbes G, Skene I, Taylor SJC. Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?-a systematic review. Trials. 2020;21:916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Effekter av avstandsoppfølging -. Følgeforskning av medisinsk avstandsoppfølging i delprosjektene VIS, Mestry, GodhelseHjemme Og HelsaMi+. Oslo: Intro International AS; 2018. Effekter av avstandsoppfølging -. Følgeforskning av medisinsk avstandsoppfølging i delprosjektene VIS, Mestry, GodhelseHjemme Og HelsaMi+. Oslo: Intro International AS; 2018.
25.
go back to reference Ny utprøving av. Medisinsk avstandsoppfølging av kronisk syke: Rammer for forsøket. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2018. Ny utprøving av. Medisinsk avstandsoppfølging av kronisk syke: Rammer for forsøket. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2018.
26.
go back to reference Pedersen KGG, Rognlien HD, Tyrihjell JB, Værnø SG, Iversen T, Holte J, Abelsen B, Pahle A, Augestad L. Sæther EM evaluering av handlingsplan for allmennlegetjenesten 2020–2024: Evalueringsrapport I. Oslo: Oslo Economics; 2022. Pedersen KGG, Rognlien HD, Tyrihjell JB, Værnø SG, Iversen T, Holte J, Abelsen B, Pahle A, Augestad L. Sæther EM evaluering av handlingsplan for allmennlegetjenesten 2020–2024: Evalueringsrapport I. Oslo: Oslo Economics; 2022.
27.
go back to reference Grimstad T, Grelland GA. TELMA: Felles telemedisinsk løsning Agder - Avstandsoppfølging for personer med kronisk sykdom. 2020. Grimstad T, Grelland GA. TELMA: Felles telemedisinsk løsning Agder - Avstandsoppfølging for personer med kronisk sykdom. 2020.
28.
go back to reference Wisløff T, Hagen G, Hamidi V, Movik E, Klemp M, Olsen JA. Estimating QALY gains in Applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32:367–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wisløff T, Hagen G, Hamidi V, Movik E, Klemp M, Olsen JA. Estimating QALY gains in Applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32:367–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Kenealy TW, Parsons MJ, Rouse AP, Doughty RN, Sheridan NF, Hindmarsh JK, et al. Telecare for diabetes, CHF or COPD: effect on quality of life, hospital use and costs. A randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0116188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kenealy TW, Parsons MJ, Rouse AP, Doughty RN, Sheridan NF, Hindmarsh JK, et al. Telecare for diabetes, CHF or COPD: effect on quality of life, hospital use and costs. A randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0116188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Eze ND, Mateus C, Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi T. Telemedicine in the OECD: an umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eze ND, Mateus C, Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi T. Telemedicine in the OECD: an umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0237585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
go back to reference Orlando JF, Beard M, Kumar S. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221848.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orlando JF, Beard M, Kumar S. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221848.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference McFarland S, Coufopolous A, Lycett D. The effect of telehealth versus usual care for home-care patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27:69–87.CrossRefPubMed McFarland S, Coufopolous A, Lycett D. The effect of telehealth versus usual care for home-care patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27:69–87.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, Smit Y, Dekker A, Fijten R. Health literacy and eHealth: challenges and strategies. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2022;6:e2200005.CrossRef Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, Smit Y, Dekker A, Fijten R. Health literacy and eHealth: challenges and strategies. JCO Clin Cancer Inf. 2022;6:e2200005.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mackert M, Mabry-Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health literacy and health information technology adoption: the potential for a new digital divide. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mackert M, Mabry-Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health literacy and health information technology adoption: the potential for a new digital divide. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Experiences with telemedicine-based follow-up of chronic conditions: the views of patients and health personnel enrolled in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Authors
Susanna Sten-Gahmberg
Kine Pedersen
Ingrid Gaarder Harsheim
Hanna Isabel Løyland
Birgit Abelsen
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Telemedicine
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10732-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue