Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics - Open 5/2022

Open Access 01-09-2022 | Targeted Therapy | Review Article

How are Companion Diagnostics Considered in Economic Evaluations of Oncology Treatments? A Review of Health Technology Assessments

Authors: Melissa Gomez Montero, Houcine El Alili, Mahmoud Hashim, Peter Wigfield, Mariya Dimova, Ralph Riley, Katie Pascoe

Published in: PharmacoEconomics - Open | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Companion diagnostic (CDx) testing is increasingly used to identify eligible patients for targeted treatments. Guidance on how CDx testing should be incorporated into cost-effectiveness models (CEM) is limited. This review evaluated how health technology assessment bodies and research organizations considered CDx in CEMs of targeted therapies in oncology and whether this ultimately impacted their decisions or time from regulatory approval to recommendations.

Methods

An exhaustive list of approved CDx tests in oncology was compiled. For corresponding indications and treatments, NICE appraisals published between 2016 and 2019 were identified. Then, assessments for the same treatments issued from 11 other agencies were reviewed. Data extracted included background and CDx information, CDx's role in the CEM, and recommendations.

Results

Twenty-seven NICE appraisals were identified; 15 considered CDx testing in the CEM, while 12 did not, mainly because testing had already been established for the comparators within the same class or in clinical practice from a prior treatment line. Both testing costs and mutation prevalence drove CDx testing costs per patient. The cross-comparison of assessments showed that CDx test characteristics were inconsistently reported. Time from regulatory approval to recommendations was not impacted by CDx cost inclusion in CEMs.

Conclusion

CDx testing was included in cost-effectiveness models whenever mutation testing was required solely for patients receiving targeted treatment; cost per patient was based on test costs and mutation prevalence. It is unclear if expanded reliance on CDx testing will impact future assessments of targeted therapies. A future update is warranted to track trends over time.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmidt KT, Chau CH, Price DK, et al. Precision oncology medicine: the clinical relevance of patientspecific biomarkers used to optimize cancer treatment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;1484–99. Schmidt KT, Chau CH, Price DK, et al. Precision oncology medicine: the clinical relevance of patientspecific biomarkers used to optimize cancer treatment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;1484–99.
2.
go back to reference Wurcel V, Perche O, Lesteven D, et al. The value of companion diagnostics: overcoming access barriers to transform personalised health care into an affordable reality in Europe. Public Health Genomics. 2016;19:137–43. Wurcel V, Perche O, Lesteven D, et al. The value of companion diagnostics: overcoming access barriers to transform personalised health care into an affordable reality in Europe. Public Health Genomics. 2016;19:137–43.
4.
go back to reference Byron SK, Crabb N, George E, et al. The health technology assessment of companion diagnostics: Experience of nice. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20. Byron SK, Crabb N, George E, et al. The health technology assessment of companion diagnostics: Experience of nice. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20.
5.
go back to reference Doble B. Economic evaluation of companion and complementary diagnostics. Companion and complementary diagnostics: from biomarker discovery to clinical implementation. 2019. Doble B. Economic evaluation of companion and complementary diagnostics. Companion and complementary diagnostics: from biomarker discovery to clinical implementation. 2019.
6.
go back to reference Annemans L, Redekop K, Payne K. Current methodological issues in the economic assessment of personalized medicine. Value Health. 2013;16. Annemans L, Redekop K, Payne K. Current methodological issues in the economic assessment of personalized medicine. Value Health. 2013;16.
10.
go back to reference Garfield S, Polisena J, Spinner DS, et al. Health technology assessment for molecular diagnostics: practices, challenges, and recommendations from the medical devices and diagnostics special interest group. Value in Health. 2016. Garfield S, Polisena J, Spinner DS, et al. Health technology assessment for molecular diagnostics: practices, challenges, and recommendations from the medical devices and diagnostics special interest group. Value in Health. 2016.
12.
go back to reference Wijnands T, Kreeftmeijer J, Kooreman P, et al. Nice collateral effect: what is the influence of nice on other Hta bodies? Value Health. 2016. Wijnands T, Kreeftmeijer J, Kooreman P, et al. Nice collateral effect: what is the influence of nice on other Hta bodies? Value Health. 2016.
23.
go back to reference Seo MK, Cairns J. How are we evaluating the cost-effectiveness of companion biomarkers for targeted cancer therapies? A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2021;21. Seo MK, Cairns J. How are we evaluating the cost-effectiveness of companion biomarkers for targeted cancer therapies? A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2021;21.
24.
go back to reference Jones C, Lazos O, Gijsen M. The role of companion diagnostics in HTAS of drugs in France, Germany and the UK. Value Health. 2017;20. Jones C, Lazos O, Gijsen M. The role of companion diagnostics in HTAS of drugs in France, Germany and the UK. Value Health. 2017;20.
25.
go back to reference Langham S, Lewis J. PMD171—health technology assessment of companion diagnostics alongside therapeutc agents in oncology: experience of the nice technology appraisal programme. Value Health. 2018;21. Langham S, Lewis J. PMD171—health technology assessment of companion diagnostics alongside therapeutc agents in oncology: experience of the nice technology appraisal programme. Value Health. 2018;21.
26.
go back to reference Warren E, Fuller R, Mulkerrin L, et al. PPM5 health technology assessment and companion diagnostics: a review of submissions to the Ncpe from 2012–2019. Value Heal. 2020;23. Warren E, Fuller R, Mulkerrin L, et al. PPM5 health technology assessment and companion diagnostics: a review of submissions to the Ncpe from 2012–2019. Value Heal. 2020;23.
28.
go back to reference Tran G, Underwood B, Wonder M. PCN356 are cancer drugs associated with a companion diagnostic test taking longer to be reimbursed in Australia? Value Health. 2019;22. Tran G, Underwood B, Wonder M. PCN356 are cancer drugs associated with a companion diagnostic test taking longer to be reimbursed in Australia? Value Health. 2019;22.
29.
go back to reference Doble B, Tan M, Harris A, et al. Modeling companion diagnostics in economic evaluations of targeted oncology therapies: systematic review and methodological checklist. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015. Doble B, Tan M, Harris A, et al. Modeling companion diagnostics in economic evaluations of targeted oncology therapies: systematic review and methodological checklist. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015.
30.
go back to reference Mathurin K, Beauchemin C, Lachaine J. Economic evaluations of companion diagnostics in cancer therapy. Value Health. 2013. Mathurin K, Beauchemin C, Lachaine J. Economic evaluations of companion diagnostics in cancer therapy. Value Health. 2013.
31.
go back to reference Faulkner E, Annemans L, Garrison L, et al. Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR personalized medicine special interest group. Value Health. 2012. Faulkner E, Annemans L, Garrison L, et al. Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR personalized medicine special interest group. Value Health. 2012.
40.
go back to reference Olaparib for maintenance treatment of relapsed, platinum-sensitive, BRCA mutation-positive ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer after response to second-line or subsequent platinum-based [TA381] chemotherapy [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA381. Olaparib for maintenance treatment of relapsed, platinum-sensitive, BRCA mutation-positive ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer after response to second-line or subsequent platinum-based [TA381] chemotherapy [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​TA381.
Metadata
Title
How are Companion Diagnostics Considered in Economic Evaluations of Oncology Treatments? A Review of Health Technology Assessments
Authors
Melissa Gomez Montero
Houcine El Alili
Mahmoud Hashim
Peter Wigfield
Mariya Dimova
Ralph Riley
Katie Pascoe
Publication date
01-09-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics - Open / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 2509-4262
Electronic ISSN: 2509-4254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00350-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

PharmacoEconomics - Open 5/2022 Go to the issue