Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

Tailored therapy for different presentations of chronic pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Authors: C. R. Asteria, J. Robert-Yap, G. Zufferey, F. Colpani, A. Pascariello, G. Lucchini, B. Roche

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) becomes more widely used, we see more patients with chronic postoperative anal pain after this surgery. Its presentation is variable and difficult to treat. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of chronic anal pain after SH and whether tailored therapy was likely to achieve a favorable outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 31 consecutive patients with chronic anal pain who had undergone SH in other hospitals and were referred to our institutions. Depending on the type of pain, unrelated (at rest) or related to defecation, two groups of patients were identified. Moreover, the mean distance of the staple line from the anal verge was calculated in both groups. Treatments included: topical nifedipine, local anesthetic and steroid infiltration, removal of retained staples, anal dilation, and scar excision with mucosal suturing. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to compare pain at baseline, postoperatively, and in the follow-up. This mean difference of the VAS score between stages was always used as the main outcome measure, depending on the type of presentation, type of pain, and type of treatment. Treatment response was defined as a 50 % decrease of VAS from baseline.

Results

There were 22 males and 9 females. The overall median age was 43 years (range 21–62 years). On digital examination and proctoscopy, 15 (48 %) patients had inflammatory changes, 19 (61 %) patients had staple retention, 8 (26 %) patients had anorectal stenosis, and 30 (97 %) patients had scar tissue. All patients had one or more of the following treatments listed from the least to most invasive: topical nifedipine in 12 (39 %) patients, anal dilation in 6 (19 %) patients, anesthetic and steroid infiltration in 18 (58 %) patients, removal of staples in 10 (32 %) patients, and scar excision in 18 (58 %) patients. The mean VAS score at baseline was 6.100, ± 1.953 SD, which dropped significantly after treatment to 1.733, ± 1.658 SD (p < 0.001) and remained low at follow-up (1.741 ± SD 1.251; p < 0.743). In patients with pain at rest (n = 20, 65 %), the symptoms improved in 19 (95 %) patients, while the VAS score decreased from 5.552 ± 2.115 SD to 1.457 ± 1.440 SD (95 % CI 3.217–4.964; p < 0.001). In patients with post-evacuation pain (n = 11, 35 %), the symptoms improved in 11 (100 %) patients, while the VAS score decreased from 6.429 ± 1.835 SD to 1.891 ± 1.792 SD (95 % CI 3.784–5.269; p < 0.001). Rating of response based on presentation was 90.0 % (0.9/10) after treatment of staple retention, which led to a significant decrease in the mean VAS score from 6.304 ± 1.845 SD to 1.782 ± 1.731 SD (95 % CI 3.859–5.185; p < 0.001). Anal stenosis was successfully treated in 100.0 % (n = 8/8) of cases with the mean VAS score dropping from 6.500 ± 1.309 SD to 2.125 ± 1.808 SD (95 % CI 2.831–5.919; p < 0.001). Anal inflammation improved in 60.0 % (n = 9/15) of patients and the mean VAS score dropped from 6.006 ± 2.138 SD to 1.542 ± 1.457 SD (95 % CI 3.217–4.964; p < 0.001). The response after scar tissue treatment was 94 % (n = 17/18) of patients with a mean VAS decreasing from 6.117 ± 2.006 SD to 1.712 ± 1.697 SD (95 % CI 3.812–4.974; p < 0.001). Success for topical nifedipine was between 13 and 25 % of patients depending on the clinical presentation. Anal dilation was successful in 75 % of patients, while Anesthetic and steroid infiltration in 23–54 % of patients depending on the clinical presentation. Staple removal was successful in 77 % of patients, and scar excision with mucosal suturing in 94 % of patients.

Conclusions

Our retrospective study suggests that most patients with chronic anal pain after SH may be cured with treatment by applying a stepwise approach from the least to the most invasive treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the sixth world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Editor Rome, Italy, June 3–6, pp 777–784 Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the sixth world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Editor Rome, Italy, June 3–6, pp 777–784
2.
go back to reference Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Haemorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Instituts, Kasachstan, pp 27–28 Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Haemorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Instituts, Kasachstan, pp 27–28
3.
go back to reference Lehur PA, Borde L, Cloarec D, Bucas JP (1989) Transsection transanale du rectum pour rupture de varices anorectales. Une nouvelle technique. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 13:746–747PubMed Lehur PA, Borde L, Cloarec D, Bucas JP (1989) Transsection transanale du rectum pour rupture de varices anorectales. Une nouvelle technique. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 13:746–747PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98 Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98
5.
go back to reference Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled Haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781CrossRefPubMed Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled Haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785CrossRefPubMed Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2003) A randomized controlled trial of Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy vs stapled haemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-case setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46:491–497CrossRefPubMed Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2003) A randomized controlled trial of Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy vs stapled haemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-case setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 46:491–497CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari A et al (2008) Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 12:iii–iv, ix–x, 1–193 Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari A et al (2008) Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 12:iii–iv, ix–x, 1–193
11.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled haemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled haemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed Haemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed Haemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystron PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2000) Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystron PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2000) Persistent pain and fecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Avgoustou C, Belegris C, Papazoglou A, Kotsalis G, Penlidis P (2014) Evaluation of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for hemorrhoidal disease: 14-year experience from 800 cases. Minerva Chir 69:155–166PubMed Avgoustou C, Belegris C, Papazoglou A, Kotsalis G, Penlidis P (2014) Evaluation of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for hemorrhoidal disease: 14-year experience from 800 cases. Minerva Chir 69:155–166PubMed
15.
17.
go back to reference Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R (2012) Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD007400 Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R (2012) Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD007400
18.
go back to reference Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE (2014) Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 155:2545–2550CrossRefPubMed Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE (2014) Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 155:2545–2550CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851CrossRefPubMed Brusciano L, Ayabaca SM, Pescatori M et al (2004) Reinterventions after complicated or failed stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1846–1851CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ougriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled haemorrhoidectomy. A French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRef Ougriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled haemorrhoidectomy. A French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157CrossRefPubMed Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy; can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88CrossRefPubMed Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy; can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidopexy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre trial comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidopexy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L et al (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting post-operative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 46:955–962CrossRefPubMed Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L et al (2003) Prospective study of factors affecting post-operative pain and symptom persistence after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 46:955–962CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Corman ML, Graviè GS, Hager T et al (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international Working Party—indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310CrossRefPubMed Corman ML, Graviè GS, Hager T et al (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international Working Party—indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Shanmugam V, Watson AJM, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, Loudon MA (2005) Pathological audit of stapled haemorhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 7:172–175CrossRefPubMed Shanmugam V, Watson AJM, Chapman AD, Binnie NR, Loudon MA (2005) Pathological audit of stapled haemorhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 7:172–175CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference George BD, Shetty D, Lindsey I, Mortensen NJ, Warren BF (2002) Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 4:473–476CrossRefPubMed George BD, Shetty D, Lindsey I, Mortensen NJ, Warren BF (2002) Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 4:473–476CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Petersen S, Jongen J, Schwenk W (2011) Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 15:259–264CrossRefPubMed Petersen S, Jongen J, Schwenk W (2011) Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 15:259–264CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Wunderlich M, Freitas A, Langmayr J, Lechner M, Tentschert G (2004) Anal incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy. J Urol Urogynakol (special issue 5) 11:31–33. www.kup.at/urologie Wunderlich M, Freitas A, Langmayr J, Lechner M, Tentschert G (2004) Anal incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy. J Urol Urogynakol (special issue 5) 11:31–33. www.​kup.​at/​urologie
33.
go back to reference Perrotti P, Dominici P, Grossi E, Cerutti R, Antropoli C (2010) Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment versus active control for pain after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double blind study. Can J Surg 53:17–24PubMedPubMedCentral Perrotti P, Dominici P, Grossi E, Cerutti R, Antropoli C (2010) Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment versus active control for pain after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized, double blind study. Can J Surg 53:17–24PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL (2005) Postdefecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 92:208–210CrossRefPubMed Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL (2005) Postdefecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 92:208–210CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Menconi C, Fabiani B, Giani I, Martellucci J, Toniolo G, Naldini G (2016) Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:41–44CrossRefPubMed Menconi C, Fabiani B, Giani I, Martellucci J, Toniolo G, Naldini G (2016) Persistent anal and pelvic floor pain after PPH and STARR: surgical management of the fixed scar staple line. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:41–44CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tailored therapy for different presentations of chronic pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy
Authors
C. R. Asteria
J. Robert-Yap
G. Zufferey
F. Colpani
A. Pascariello
G. Lucchini
B. Roche
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1458-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2016 Go to the issue