Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Protocol

Systematic review of the health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: protocol

Authors: Susanna Mills, Martin White, Shannon Robalino, Wendy Wrieden, Heather Brown, Jean Adams

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The United Kingdom (UK) and wider world are experiencing an obesity epidemic, with lower socio-economic groups disproportionately affected. Dietary quality is also socio-economically patterned, with an estimated quarter of observed inequalities in UK mortality due to inequalities in diet. Food preparation and eating patterns clearly have an impact on dietary intake and hence health. A growing body of evidence indicates that out of home food consumption and eating ready meals may be associated with negative outcomes. However, to date no systematic reviews have assessed the health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking. Here, home cooking refers to the combination of actions required for preparing hot or cold foods at home, including combining, mixing and often heating ingredients.

Methods/Design

A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature on home cooking will be undertaken. Studies will be considered for inclusion if they present qualitative or quantitative data on participants from high/very high human development index countries, including all relevant study designs. No language or date of publication restrictions will be applied. Determinants will be considered as factors that influence behaviour and outcomes as potential advantages and disadvantages of engaging in home cooking. Electronic databases of peer-reviewed journal articles covering health, psychology, social sciences and consumer practices will be searched. Published postgraduate theses will also be considered for inclusion. Additional strategies to identify relevant studies will be used, such as citation searches of included articles, evaluation of references from relevant reviews and included articles and the ‘related/similar to’ function found in certain databases. Two independent researchers will be involved in literature screening (10% at first screen and 100% at second screen), data extraction and quality appraisal. Studies included in the review will be analysed by thematic synthesis and narrative synthesis, as appropriate for the nature of the data retrieved.

Discussion

This review will provide key empirical evidence to inform the development of recommendations for public health policy makers and practitioners to encourage healthier home food preparation, thereby impacting on dietary-related health.

Systematic review registration

This protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, reference CRD42014013984.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stringhini S, Dugravot A, Shipley M, Goldberg M, Zins M, Kivimäki M, et al. Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stringhini S, Dugravot A, Shipley M, Goldberg M, Zins M, Kivimäki M, et al. Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lang T, Caraher M, Dixon P, Carr-Hill R. Cooking skills and health. London: Health Education Authority; 1999. Lang T, Caraher M, Dixon P, Carr-Hill R. Cooking skills and health. London: Health Education Authority; 1999.
3.
go back to reference Smith L, Ng S, Popkin B. Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965–1966 to 2007–2008. Nutr J. 2013;12:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith L, Ng S, Popkin B. Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965–1966 to 2007–2008. Nutr J. 2013;12:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Möser A. Food preparation patterns in German family households. An econometric approach with time budget data. Appetite. 2010;55:99–107.CrossRefPubMed Möser A. Food preparation patterns in German family households. An econometric approach with time budget data. Appetite. 2010;55:99–107.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pollan M. Cooked: a natural history of transformation. USA: Penguin group; 2013. Pollan M. Cooked: a natural history of transformation. USA: Penguin group; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Bates B, Lennox A, Swan G. National diet and nutrition survey: headline results from year 1 of the rolling programme (2008/2009). London: Food Standards Agency; 2010. Bates B, Lennox A, Swan G. National diet and nutrition survey: headline results from year 1 of the rolling programme (2008/2009). London: Food Standards Agency; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Swan G. Findings from the latest national diet and nutrition survey. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:505–12.CrossRefPubMed Swan G. Findings from the latest national diet and nutrition survey. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:505–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Beydoun MA, Powell LM, Wang Y. Reduced away-from-home food expenditure and better nutrition knowledge and belief can improve quality of dietary intake among US adults. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:369–81.PubMed Beydoun MA, Powell LM, Wang Y. Reduced away-from-home food expenditure and better nutrition knowledge and belief can improve quality of dietary intake among US adults. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:369–81.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lobato JC, Costa AJ, Sichieri R. Food intake and prevalence of obesity in Brazil: an ecological analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:2209–15.CrossRefPubMed Lobato JC, Costa AJ, Sichieri R. Food intake and prevalence of obesity in Brazil: an ecological analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:2209–15.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:332–6.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:332–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Program UND. Human development report 2014. New York: United Nations Development Program; 2014. Program UND. Human development report 2014. New York: United Nations Development Program; 2014.
20.
go back to reference von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer E. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA. 2004;291:974–80.CrossRef von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer E. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA. 2004;291:974–80.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the U.S. preventive services task force. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the U.S. preventive services task force. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
22.
go back to reference Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21:1635–40.CrossRefPubMed Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21:1635–40.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:176–84.CrossRefPubMed Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:176–84.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Smith KE, Bambra C, Joyce KE, Perkins N, Hunter DJ, Blenkinsopp EA. Partners in health? A systematic review of the impact of organizational partnerships on public health outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008. J Public Health. 2009;31:210–21.CrossRef Smith KE, Bambra C, Joyce KE, Perkins N, Hunter DJ, Blenkinsopp EA. Partners in health? A systematic review of the impact of organizational partnerships on public health outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008. J Public Health. 2009;31:210–21.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Britten N, Arai L. Developing guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59 Suppl 1:A7. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Britten N, Arai L. Developing guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59 Suppl 1:A7.
Metadata
Title
Systematic review of the health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: protocol
Authors
Susanna Mills
Martin White
Shannon Robalino
Wendy Wrieden
Heather Brown
Jean Adams
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0033-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Systematic Reviews 1/2015 Go to the issue