Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015

01-10-2015 | Epidemiology

Survival of patients with de-novo metastatic breast cancer: analysis of data from a large breast cancer-specific private practice, a university-based cancer center and review of the literature

Authors: Simon B. Zeichner, Stuart Herna, Aruna Mani, Tadeu Ambros, Alberto J. Montero, Reshma L. Mahtani, Eugene R. Ahn, Charles L. Vogel

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Approximately 6 % of patients with breast cancer are diagnosed with de-novo distant metastases. We set out to look at two cohorts of patients seen at breast cancer-specific practices, compare the results to other reports and larger databases, and see how advances in treatment have impacted overall survival (OS). The records from a large breast cancer oncology private practice and a second data set from the University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (UM/SCCC) tumor database were, retrospectively, reviewed to identify patients with de-novo metastases. We included those patients identified to have metastatic disease within 3 months of diagnosis of a breast primary cancer. Patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2006 were chosen for our study population. The OS for the private practice was 41.0 months (46.0 for ER positive and 26.0 for ER negative) and 36.0 months for UM/SCCC (52 months for ER positive and 36 months for ER negative). ER negativity and CNS- or visceral-dominant disease were associated with a significantly worse prognosis within the private practice. Dominant site was associated with a significantly worse prognosis within the UM/SCCC database but with a trend also for ER negativity. Age and ethnicity did not contribute significantly to the survival of patients within either cohort. The median survival in both cohorts and most other reported series was larger than that seen in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program and the National Cancer Database. The median OS among patients with de-novo metastatic breast cancer treated within two breast-specific oncology practices was over 3 years, which appears better than larger, more inclusive databases and publications from earlier decades.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lobbezoo DJA, van Kampen RJW, Voogd AC et al (2015) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Br J Cancer 112(9):1445–1451. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.127 CrossRefPubMed Lobbezoo DJA, van Kampen RJW, Voogd AC et al (2015) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Br J Cancer 112(9):1445–1451. doi:10.​1038/​bjc.​2015.​127 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rahman Z, Frye D, Smith T (2000) Results and long term follow-up for 1581 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with standard dose doxorubicin containing chemotherapy. Cancer 40(19990101):1–2 Rahman Z, Frye D, Smith T (2000) Results and long term follow-up for 1581 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with standard dose doxorubicin containing chemotherapy. Cancer 40(19990101):1–2
5.
go back to reference Nieto Y, Nawaz S, Jones RB et al (2002) Prognostic model for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for stage IV oligometastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(3):707–718CrossRefPubMed Nieto Y, Nawaz S, Jones RB et al (2002) Prognostic model for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for stage IV oligometastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(3):707–718CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hortobagyi GN (2002) Can we cure limited metastatic breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 20(3):620–623PubMed Hortobagyi GN (2002) Can we cure limited metastatic breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 20(3):620–623PubMed
10.
go back to reference Friedel G, Pastorino U, Ginsberg RJ et al (2002) Results of lung metastasectomy from breast cancer: prognostic criteria on the basis of 467 cases of the international registry of lung metastases. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 22(3):335–344CrossRef Friedel G, Pastorino U, Ginsberg RJ et al (2002) Results of lung metastasectomy from breast cancer: prognostic criteria on the basis of 467 cases of the international registry of lung metastases. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 22(3):335–344CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chia SK, Speers CH, D’yachkova Y et al (2007) The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 110(5):973–979. doi:10.1002/cncr.22867 CrossRefPubMed Chia SK, Speers CH, D’yachkova Y et al (2007) The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 110(5):973–979. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​22867 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zinser JW, Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, Fraschini G (1987) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 5(5):773–782PubMed Zinser JW, Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, Fraschini G (1987) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 5(5):773–782PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P et al (2003) Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as frontline chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol 21:588–592CrossRefPubMed Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P et al (2003) Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as frontline chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol 21:588–592CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brufman G, Colajori E, Ghilezan N et al (1997) Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer. The epirubicin high dose (HEPI 010) study group. Ann Oncol 8(2):155–162CrossRefPubMed Brufman G, Colajori E, Ghilezan N et al (1997) Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer. The epirubicin high dose (HEPI 010) study group. Ann Oncol 8(2):155–162CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792CrossRefPubMed Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Aisner J, Cirrincione C, Perloff M et al (1995) Combination chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the breast—a randomized phase III trial comparing CAF versus VATH versus VATH alternating with CMFVP: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8281. J Clin Oncol 13(6):1443–1452PubMed Aisner J, Cirrincione C, Perloff M et al (1995) Combination chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the breast—a randomized phase III trial comparing CAF versus VATH versus VATH alternating with CMFVP: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8281. J Clin Oncol 13(6):1443–1452PubMed
17.
go back to reference Estaban E, Lacave AJ, Fernández JL et al (1999) Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil (CEF) versus cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (CNF) in women with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 58(2):141–150CrossRefPubMed Estaban E, Lacave AJ, Fernández JL et al (1999) Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil (CEF) versus cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (CNF) in women with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 58(2):141–150CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pacini P, Rinaldini M, Algeri R et al (2000) FEC (5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) versus EM (epidoxorubicin and mitomycin-C) with or without lonidamine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. A multicentric randomised study. Final results. Eur J Cancer 36(8):966–975CrossRefPubMed Pacini P, Rinaldini M, Algeri R et al (2000) FEC (5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) versus EM (epidoxorubicin and mitomycin-C) with or without lonidamine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. A multicentric randomised study. Final results. Eur J Cancer 36(8):966–975CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee T, Isaacs C (2014) Treatment of primary breast tumors in de novo metastatic breast cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 12(12):820–827PubMed Lee T, Isaacs C (2014) Treatment of primary breast tumors in de novo metastatic breast cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 12(12):820–827PubMed
20.
go back to reference Dominici L, Najita J, Hughes M et al (2011) Surgery of the primary tumor does not improve survival in stage IV breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(2):459–465PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dominici L, Najita J, Hughes M et al (2011) Surgery of the primary tumor does not improve survival in stage IV breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(2):459–465PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G et al (2006) Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(18):2743–2749CrossRefPubMed Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G et al (2006) Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 24(18):2743–2749CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Shien T, Nakamura K, Shibata T et al (2012) A randomized controlled trial comparing primary tumour resection plus systemic therapy with systemic therapy alone in metastatic breast cancer (PRIM-BC): Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1017. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(10):970–973CrossRefPubMed Shien T, Nakamura K, Shibata T et al (2012) A randomized controlled trial comparing primary tumour resection plus systemic therapy with systemic therapy alone in metastatic breast cancer (PRIM-BC): Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1017. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(10):970–973CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L et al (2006) Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 13(6):776–782CrossRefPubMed Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L et al (2006) Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 13(6):776–782CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Infante JR, Yardley DA, Burris HA 3rd et al (2009) Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel, vinorelbine, and trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 9(1):23–28CrossRefPubMed Infante JR, Yardley DA, Burris HA 3rd et al (2009) Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel, vinorelbine, and trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 9(1):23–28CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Berghoff AS, Bago-Horvath Z, Dubsky P et al (2013) Impact of HER-2-targeted therapy on overall survival in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast J 19(2):149–155. doi:10.1111/tbj.12070 CrossRefPubMed Berghoff AS, Bago-Horvath Z, Dubsky P et al (2013) Impact of HER-2-targeted therapy on overall survival in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast J 19(2):149–155. doi:10.​1111/​tbj.​12070 CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gennari A, Amadori D, De Lena M et al (2006) Lack of benefit of maintenance paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(24):3912–3918CrossRefPubMed Gennari A, Amadori D, De Lena M et al (2006) Lack of benefit of maintenance paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(24):3912–3918CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bertaut A, Mounier M, Desmoulins I et al (2015) Stage IV breast cancer: a population-based study about prognostic factors according to HER2 and HR status. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). doi:10.1111/ecc.12306 Bertaut A, Mounier M, Desmoulins I et al (2015) Stage IV breast cancer: a population-based study about prognostic factors according to HER2 and HR status. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). doi:10.​1111/​ecc.​12306
32.
go back to reference Zeichner SB, Ambros T, Zaravinos J et al (2015) Defining the survival benchmark for breast cancer patients with systemic relapse. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 9:9–17PubMedCentral Zeichner SB, Ambros T, Zaravinos J et al (2015) Defining the survival benchmark for breast cancer patients with systemic relapse. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 9:9–17PubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, Caggiano V (2009) Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004. Breast J 15(6):593–602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00822.x CrossRefPubMed Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, Caggiano V (2009) Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004. Breast J 15(6):593–602. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1524-4741.​2009.​00822.​x CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Survival of patients with de-novo metastatic breast cancer: analysis of data from a large breast cancer-specific private practice, a university-based cancer center and review of the literature
Authors
Simon B. Zeichner
Stuart Herna
Aruna Mani
Tadeu Ambros
Alberto J. Montero
Reshma L. Mahtani
Eugene R. Ahn
Charles L. Vogel
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3564-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine