Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Religion and Health 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Paper

Surrogate Motherhood Revisited: Maternal Identity from a Jewish Perspective

Author: Alan Jotkowitz

Published in: Journal of Religion and Health | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

A new bill regulating ovum donation in Israel is set to pass its second and third readings in the Israel Parliament in the upcoming months. The new law will expand the number of locally donated ova available, as previously Israeli women were prohibited from donating eggs unless they were undergoing fertility treatment. Parallel to this legislative initiative, there has been a change in rabbinical thinking over who is considered the mother in a case of surrogacy. Previously, the consensus has been that the birth mother is to be considered the mother, but over the last few years there has been a change in thinking and the genetic mother is now considered the mother. The purpose of this paper is to present the ethical and legal issues from a Jewish perspective in determining maternal identity. The dilemma also demonstrates some of the difficulties in applying Talmudic law to modern problems and the various methodologies used to overcome these issues.
Literature
go back to reference Ber, R. (2000). Ethical issues in gestational surrogacy. Theoritical Medicine and Bioethethics, 21(2), 153–169.CrossRef Ber, R. (2000). Ethical issues in gestational surrogacy. Theoritical Medicine and Bioethethics, 21(2), 153–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Bik, E. (1997). Ovum donations: A rabbinic conceptual model of maternity. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 83–105). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. Bik, E. (1997). Ovum donations: A rabbinic conceptual model of maternity. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 83–105). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
go back to reference Bleich, J. D. (1997a). In vitro fertilization: questions of maternal identity and conversion. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 46–82). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. p. 49. Bleich, J. D. (1997a). In vitro fertilization: questions of maternal identity and conversion. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 46–82). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. p. 49.
go back to reference Bleich, J. D. (1997b). Maternal identity revisited. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 113–114). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. Bleich, J. D. (1997b). Maternal identity revisited. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 113–114). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
go back to reference Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
go back to reference Ramsey, P. (1986). Moral and religious implications of genetic control. In S. E. Lammers & A. Verhey (Eds.), On moral medicine: Theological perspectives in medical ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. Ramsey, P. (1986). Moral and religious implications of genetic control. In S. E. Lammers & A. Verhey (Eds.), On moral medicine: Theological perspectives in medical ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
go back to reference Reichman, E. (1997). The rabbinic conception of conception: An exercise in fertility. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 1–35). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV. Reichman, E. (1997). The rabbinic conception of conception: An exercise in fertility. In E. Feldman & J. B. Wolowelsky (Eds.), Jewish law and the new reproductive technologies (pp. 1–35). Hoboken, NJ: KTAV.
go back to reference Siegel-Itzkovich, J. (2010). Rabbis change views on who’s the “mother” of IVF children. The Jerusalem Post. Siegel-Itzkovich, J. (2010). Rabbis change views on who’s the “mother” of IVF children. The Jerusalem Post.
go back to reference Waldenberg, E. (1986). Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, part 15 #45. Jerusalem. Waldenberg, E. (1986). Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, part 15 #45. Jerusalem.
go back to reference Warhaftig, I. (1984). Test-tube babies–addendum. Techumin, 5, 268–269. Warhaftig, I. (1984). Test-tube babies–addendum. Techumin, 5, 268–269.
go back to reference Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Commercial surrogacy and the redefinition of motherhood. Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law, 2. Available at www.psljournal.com. Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Commercial surrogacy and the redefinition of motherhood. Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law, 2. Available at www.​psljournal.​com.
Metadata
Title
Surrogate Motherhood Revisited: Maternal Identity from a Jewish Perspective
Author
Alan Jotkowitz
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9494-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Religion and Health 4/2011 Go to the issue

EDITORIAL

Editorial