Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives

Authors: A. R. Bosma, C. R. L. Boot, N. C. Snippen, F. G. Schaafsma, J. R. Anema

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Supporting employees with chronic conditions can prevent work-related problems and facilitate sustainable employment. Various stakeholders are involved in providing support to these employees. Understanding their current practices and experienced barriers is useful for the development of an organizational-level intervention to improve this support. The aim of this study was to explore the current practices of occupational physicians and organizational representatives, identifying both barriers to providing support and opportunities for improvement.

Methods

Two focus groups with sixteen occupational physicians and seven semi-structured interviews with organizational representatives were held between January and June 2018. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results

Several barriers to offer support were identified, including barriers at the organizational level (negative organizational attitudes towards employees with chronic conditions), the employee level (employees’ reluctance to collaborate with employers in dealing with work-related problems), and in the collaboration between occupational physicians and organizational representatives. In addition, barriers in occupational health care were described, e.g. occupational physicians’ lack of visibility and a lack of utilization of occupational physicians’ support. Opportunities to optimize support included a shared responsibility of all stakeholders involved, actively anchoring prevention of work-related problems in policy and practice and a more pronounced role of the health care sector in preventing work-related problems.

Conclusions

Preventing work-related problems for employees with chronic conditions can be achieved by addressing the identified barriers to provide support. In addition, both occupational physicians and organizational representatives should initiate and secure preventive support at the organizational level and in occupational health care. These insights are helpful in developing an intervention aimed at supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work.

Available only for authorised users

Meade M, Reed K, Rumrill P, Aust R, Krause J. Perceptions of quality of employment outcomes after multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. J Rehabil. 2016;82(2):31–40.

de Jong M, de Boer AGEM, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MHW. Quality of working life issues of employees with a chronic physical disease: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):182–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9517-6.CrossRefPubMed

Strömberg C, Aboagye E, Hagberg J, Bergström G, Lohela-Karlsson M. Estimating the effect and economic impact of absenteeism, Presenteeism, and work environment–related problems on reductions in productivity from a managerial perspective. Value Health. 2017;20(8):1058–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.008.CrossRefPubMed

European Chronic Diseases Alliance. Joint Statement on “Improving the employment of people with chronic diseases in Europe”. 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/policies/docs/2017_chronic_framingdoc_en.pdf. Accessed 2018.

Maurits, Rijken, Friele. Knowledge-synthesis Chronic illness and work - Labor participation by people with a chronic illness or physical disability. 2013. https://www.nivel.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/Kennissynthese-Chronisch-Ziek-en-Werk.pdf. Accessed 2017.

Bosma AR, Boot CRL, Schaafsma FG, Anema JR. Facilitators, barriers and support needs for staying at work with a chronic condition: a focus group study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8320-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Palstam A, Gard G, Mannerkorpi K. Factors promoting sustainable work in women with fibromyalgia. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(19):1622–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748842.CrossRefPubMed

Gignac MAM, Bowring J, Jetha A, Beaton DE, Breslin FC, Franche R-L, et al. Disclosure, privacy and workplace accommodation of episodic disabilities: organizational perspectives on disability communication-support processes to sustain employment. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;31(1):153–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09901-2.CrossRef

Bosma A, Boot CRL, de Maaker M, Boeije HR, Schoonmade LJ, Anema JR, et al. Exploring Self-control of Workers with a Chronic Condition: a Qualitative Synthesis. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2019;28(5):653–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1631801.CrossRef

10.

World Health Organization. Good practice in occupational health services: A contribution to workplace health. 2002. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107448/E77650.pdf;jsessionid=0982832BB00804F7359F5517CA94E75C?sequence=1. Accessed 2018.

11.

Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. Working Conditions Portal - Gatekeeper Improvement Act. https://www.arboportaal.nl/onderwerpen/wet-verbetering-poortwachter. Accessed 2019.

12.

de Brouwer CPM, Verdonk P, van Amelsvoort LGPM, Jansen NWH, Kant I, Widdershoven GAM. Experiences of occupational physicians with the implementation of indicated prevention for long term sickness absence. Work (Reading, Mass). 2017;57(2):157–72.

13.

Moriguchi J, Ikeda M, Sakuragi S, Takeda K, Muto T, Higashi T, et al. Activities of occupational physicians for occupational health services in small-scale enterprises in Japan and in the Netherlands. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010;83(4):389–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-010-0514-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Haafkens JA, Kopnina H, Meerman MGM, van Dijk FJH. Facilitating job retention for chronically ill employees: perspectives of line managers and human resource managers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kopnina H, Haafkens JA. Disability management: organizational diversity and Dutch employment policy. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):247–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9234-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Hutting N, Detaille SI, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Staal JB, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Development of a self-management program for employees with complaints of the arm, neck, and/or shoulder: an intervention mapping approach. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:307–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S82809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick B, Munir F, Tveito TH, Anema JR, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a comparison of scientific literature, Grey literature and stakeholder observations. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):417–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9664-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Detaille SI, van der Gulden JWJ, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, van Dijk FJH. Using intervention mapping (IM) to develop a self-management programme for employees with a chronic disease in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:353.CrossRef

19.

Gordon RS Jr. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983;98(2):107–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Pransky GS, Fassier J-B, Besen E, Blanck P, Ekberg K, Feuerstein M, et al. Sustaining work participation across the life course. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):465–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9670-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Montano D, Hoven H, Siegrist J. Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees' health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:135.CrossRef

22.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRef

23.

Bernell S, Howard SW. Use Your Words Carefully: What Is a Chronic Disease? Front Public Health. 2016;4:159.CrossRef

24.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRef

25.

Gilbride D, Stensrud R, Vandergoot D, Golden K. Identification of the characteristics of work environments and employers open to hiring and accommodating people with disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2003;46(3):130–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552030460030101.CrossRef

26.

Strindlund L, Abrandt-Dahlgren M, Ståhl C. Employers’ views on disability, employability, and labor market inclusion: a phenomenographic study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(24):2910–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1481150.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Phillips K, Houtenville A, O’Neill J, Katz E. The effectiveness of employer practices to recruit, hire, and retain employees with disabilities: supervisor perspectives. J Vocat Rehabil. 2019;51:1–15.CrossRef

28.

Abma FI, Bültmann U, Varekamp I, van der Klink JJL. Workers with health problems: three perspectives on functioning at work. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(1):20–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.687027.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sociaal Economische Raad. Werk: van belang voor iedereen - Een advies over werken met een chronische ziekte. 2016. https://www.ser.nl/~/media/db_adviezen/2010_2019/2016/werken-chronische-ziekte.ashx. Accessed 2017.

30.

Grant M, O-Beirne-Elliman J, Froud R, Underwood M, Seers K. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743.CrossRef

31.

Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–72. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1049377.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Nelson CC, Shaw W, Robertson M. Supervisors and Presenteeism: how do supervisors accommodate and support skilled workers with chronic health concerns? Empl Responsib Rights J. 2016;28(4):209–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-015-9275-4.CrossRef

33.

Erickson W, Schrader S, Bruyere S, Vanlooy S. The employment environment: employer perspectives, policies, and practices regarding the employment of persons with disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2013;57:195–208.CrossRef

34.

Williams A, Fossey E, Harvey C. Social firms: Sustainable employment for people with mental illness. Work (Reading, Mass). 2012;43(1):53–62.

35.

Paulsson SÅ, Schmidt L, Eriksson T, Nyman T, Parmsund M, Torgén M, et al. Procurement and implementation processes for Occupational Health Services in Sweden. Work (Reading, Mass). 2020;65:607–15.

36.

Schmidt L, Sjöström J, Antonsson AB. Is ownership the decisive factor in collaborations between occupational health services and client companies? Work (Reading, Mass). 2017;56(2):309–18.

37.

Eurofound. How to respond to chronic health problems in the workplace? Luxemburg; 2019. (europa.eu) Accessed 2020

38.

el Markhous NPS, Hermsen M. Waarom NVAB-richtlijnen niet worden gevolgd. Een kwalitatief onderzoek naar het oordeel van bedrijfsartsen. TBV. 2012;20(7):306–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12498-012-0147-7.CrossRef

39.

Halonen JI, Atkins S, Hakulinen H, Pesonen S, Uitti J. Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: a systematic review of key characteristics. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3924-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Schmidt L, Sjöström J, Antonsson AB. Successful collaboration between occupational health service providers and client companies: Key factors. Work (Reading, Mass). 2015;51(2):229–37.

41.

Miller P, Rossiter P, Nuttall D. Demonstrating the economic value of occupational health services. Occup Med. 2002;52(8):477–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.8.477.CrossRef

42.

International Social Security Association. The return on prevention: Calculating the costs and benefits of investments in occupational safety and health in companies. 2011. https://ww1.issa.int/sites/default/files/documents/publications/2-Return-on-prevention_en-29437.pdf. Accessed 2020.

43.

Schmidt L, Sjöström J, Antonsson AB. How can occupational health services in Sweden contribute to work ability? Work (Reading, Mass). 2012;41(Suppl 1):2998–3001.

44.

Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. Aanpak dreigend tekort bedrijfsartsen. 2017. https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/verslagen/detail?id=2017Z05296&did=2017D11055. Accessed 2019.

45.

Stratil JM, Rieger MA, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):769.CrossRef

46.

Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine. Vision, Mission & Strategy of the NSOM - The company doctor, doctor and advisor, specialist for work and health 2016. Available from: https://nvab-online.nl/organisatie-missie-visie. Accessed 2019.

Title: Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives
Authors: A. R. Bosma
C. R. L. Boot
N. C. Snippen
F. G. Schaafsma
J. R. Anema
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10633-y

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Routine mortality surveillance to identify the cause of death pattern for out-of-hospital adult (aged 12+ years) deaths in Bangladesh: introduction of automated verbal autopsy

Prevalence and associated factors of HIV testing among reproductive-age women in eastern Africa: multilevel analysis of demographic and health surveys

Pregnant women’s experiences of social distancing behavioural guidelines during the Covid-19 pandemic ‘lockdown’ in the UK, a qualitative interview study

A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to reducing sedentary time in adults with chronic low back pain

Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘strengthening families, strengthening communities’ group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights

Associations between participation in, intensity of, and time spent on leisure time physical activity and risk of inflammatory bowel disease among older adults (PA-IBD): a prospective cohort study