Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Study protocol

Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘strengthening families, strengthening communities’ group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights

Authors: Annemarie Lodder, Anita Mehay, Hana Pavlickova, Zoe Hoare, Leandra Box, Jabeer Butt, Tim Weaver, Mike J. Crawford, Donna Clutterbuck, Nicola Westbrook, Karlet Manning, Saffron Karlsen, Steve Morris, Andrew Brand, Paul Ramchandani, Yvonne Kelly, Anja Heilmann, Richard G. Watt

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Up to 20% of UK children experience socio-emotional difficulties which can have serious implications for themselves, their families and society. Stark socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in children’s well-being exist. Supporting parents to develop effective parenting skills is an important preventive strategy in reducing inequalities. Parenting interventions have been developed, which aim to reduce the severity and impact of these difficulties. However, most parenting interventions in the UK focus on early childhood (0–10 years) and often fail to engage families from ethnic minority groups and those living in poverty. Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities (SFSC) is a parenting programme designed by the Race Equality Foundation, which aims to address this gap. Evidence from preliminary studies is encouraging, but no randomised controlled trials have been undertaken so far.

Methods/design

The TOGETHER study is a multi-centre, waiting list controlled, randomised trial, which aims to test the effectiveness of SFSC in families with children aged 3–18 across seven urban areas in England with ethnically and socially diverse populations. The primary outcome is parental mental well-being (assessed by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). Secondary outcomes include child socio-emotional well-being, parenting practices, family relationships, self-efficacy, quality of life, and community engagement. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, post intervention, three- and six-months post intervention. Cost effectiveness will be estimated using a cost-utility analysis and cost-consequences analysis. The study is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 comprised a 6-month internal pilot to determine the feasibility of the trial. A set of progression criteria were developed to determine whether the stage 2 main trial should proceed. An embedded process evaluation will assess the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.

Discussion

In this paper we provide details of the study protocol for this trial. We also describe challenges to implementing the protocol and how these were addressed. Once completed, if beneficial effects on both parental and child outcomes are found, the impact, both immediate and longer term, are potentially significant. As the intervention focuses on supporting families living in poverty and those from minority ethnic communities, the intervention should also ultimately have a beneficial impact on reducing health inequalities.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN15194500.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Green H, McGinnity A, Meltzer H, Ford T, Goodman R. Mental health of children and young people in Great Britain. Office for National Statistics; 2005. Green H, McGinnity A, Meltzer H, Ford T, Goodman R. Mental health of children and young people in Great Britain. Office for National Statistics; 2005.
3.
go back to reference Hansen K, Joshi H. Millennium cohort study second survey: a User’s guide to initial findings. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University of London; 2007. Hansen K, Joshi H. Millennium cohort study second survey: a User’s guide to initial findings. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University of London; 2007.
5.
go back to reference Marmot M. Fair Society Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review). In: The strategic review of health inequalities in england post-2010; 2010. Marmot M. Fair Society Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review). In: The strategic review of health inequalities in england post-2010; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Zilanawala A, Sacker A, Nazroo J, Kelly Y. Ethnic differences in children’s socioemotional difficulties: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Soc Sci Med. 2015;134:95–106.CrossRef Zilanawala A, Sacker A, Nazroo J, Kelly Y. Ethnic differences in children’s socioemotional difficulties: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Soc Sci Med. 2015;134:95–106.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dretzke J, Davenport C, Frew E, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S, Bayliss S, et al. The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2009;3(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-3-7. Dretzke J, Davenport C, Frew E, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S, Bayliss S, et al. The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2009;3(1):7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1753-2000-3-7.
17.
go back to reference Burkey MD, Hosein M, Morton I, Purgato M, Adi A, Kurzrok M, et al. Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behaviour problems in children in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59(9):982–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12894. Burkey MD, Hosein M, Morton I, Purgato M, Adi A, Kurzrok M, et al. Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behaviour problems in children in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59(9):982–93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jcpp.​12894.
19.
go back to reference Copeland E. Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. Am J Health Stud. 2005;20(3–4):164–70. Copeland E. Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. Am J Health Stud. 2005;20(3–4):164–70.
20.
go back to reference Karlsen S. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities programme. 2007–2009. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2013. Karlsen S. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities programme. 2007–2009. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Wilding J, Barton M. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities Programme 2004/5 full report. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2007. Wilding J, Barton M. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities Programme 2004/5 full report. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2007.
22.
go back to reference Wilding J, Barton M. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities Programme 2005/6 and 2006/7 full report. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2009. Wilding J, Barton M. Evaluation of the strengthening families, strengthening communities Programme 2005/6 and 2006/7 full report. London: Race Equality Foundation; 2009.
23.
go back to reference Kelly Y. Evaluation of the Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities programme 2014-2017. London: UCL; 2017. Kelly Y. Evaluation of the Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities programme 2014-2017. London: UCL; 2017.
31.
go back to reference Driscoll K, Pianta RC. Mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of conflict and closeness in parent-child relationships during early childhood. J Early Childhood Infant Psychol. 2011;7:1–24. Driscoll K, Pianta RC. Mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of conflict and closeness in parent-child relationships during early childhood. J Early Childhood Infant Psychol. 2011;7:1–24.
33.
35.
go back to reference Kidger J, Evans R, Tilling K, Hollingworth W, Campbell R, Ford T, et al. Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve the mental health support and training available to secondary school teachers - the WISE (wellbeing in secondary education) study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1089. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3756-8. Kidger J, Evans R, Tilling K, Hollingworth W, Campbell R, Ford T, et al. Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to improve the mental health support and training available to secondary school teachers - the WISE (wellbeing in secondary education) study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1089. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-016-3756-8.
36.
go back to reference Putz R, O'Hara K, Taggart F, Stewart-Brown S. Using WEMWBS to measure the impact of your work on mental wellbeing: A practice-based user guide. 2012. Putz R, O'Hara K, Taggart F, Stewart-Brown S. Using WEMWBS to measure the impact of your work on mental wellbeing: A practice-based user guide. 2012.
38.
go back to reference Ford T, Edwards V, Sharkey S, Ukoumunne OC, Byford S, Norwich B, et al. Supporting teachers and children in schools: the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the incredible years teacher classroom management programme in primary school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial, with parallel economic and process evaluations. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:719. Ford T, Edwards V, Sharkey S, Ukoumunne OC, Byford S, Norwich B, et al. Supporting teachers and children in schools: the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the incredible years teacher classroom management programme in primary school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial, with parallel economic and process evaluations. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:719.
40.
go back to reference Nice. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance. 3rd ed. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2012. Nice. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance. 3rd ed. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2012.
45.
go back to reference Bywater T, Gridley N, Berry VL, et al. The parent programme implementation checklist (PPIC): the development and testing of an objective measure of skills and fidelity for the delivery of parent programmes. Child Care Pract. 2019;25(3):281–30.CrossRef Bywater T, Gridley N, Berry VL, et al. The parent programme implementation checklist (PPIC): the development and testing of an objective measure of skills and fidelity for the delivery of parent programmes. Child Care Pract. 2019;25(3):281–30.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mason J. Qualitative researching. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. Mason J. Qualitative researching. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017.
47.
go back to reference Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EOC, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013537. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537. Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EOC, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013537. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2016-013537.
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘strengthening families, strengthening communities’ group-based parenting programme: study protocol and initial insights
Authors
Annemarie Lodder
Anita Mehay
Hana Pavlickova
Zoe Hoare
Leandra Box
Jabeer Butt
Tim Weaver
Mike J. Crawford
Donna Clutterbuck
Nicola Westbrook
Karlet Manning
Saffron Karlsen
Steve Morris
Andrew Brand
Paul Ramchandani
Yvonne Kelly
Anja Heilmann
Richard G. Watt
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11912-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue