Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 4/2020

01-11-2020 | Sufentanil | Original Article

A micro-costing study: comparing a standard intravenous patient-controlled analgesia system with a novel sublingual patient-controlled analgesia system

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Judicious spending in healthcare is of paramount importance, particularly when introducing new devices or interventions. These products or interventions need to be economically efficient both directly and indirectly. An accepted method of cost estimation is micro-costing. Micro-costing involves direct enumeration and costing of every input consumed in the treatment of a particular patient when using new device, medicine or intervention. In our study, we investigated the cost of using a novel sublingual (SL) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and compared it with our conventional intravenous (IV) PCA device.

Methods

A previous study performed in our institution produced a cost per use of IV PCA device at €97. This compared with a previous European study published in this journal in 2010 which showed a similar figure of €96 per use of IV PCA device. In our comparative study, we used a case record form (CRF) to incorporate a cost to all consumables used, staff time and equipment used to both the SL PCA and the IV PCA.

Results

A total of 60 patients of similar demographic were included in our study. The cost of an IV PCA episode was €97.89 and €182.32 for an SL PCA episode. Standl et al. (2010) showed that the average cost of an IV PCA episode was €96.40 with 78% of this being made up of staff time. SL PCA was more efficacious in certain patient groups and in certain surgical groups.

Conclusion

After performance of a micro-costing study, the less costly IV PCA episode was statistically significant compared with a SL PCA episode. However, the associated staff costs were less with a SL PCA episode. We performed a micro-costing study on a novel sublingual PCA device and compared it with a conventional intravenous PCA device. All resources were included and compared.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document. Country Report Ireland. Including an in-depth revise on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances. SWD (2017) 73 Final. European Commission, Brussels; 2017 European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document. Country Report Ireland. Including an in-depth revise on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances. SWD (2017) 73 Final. European Commission, Brussels; 2017
3.
go back to reference Tan SS, Rutten FFH, van Ineveld BM et al (2009) Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services. Eur J Health Econ 10:39CrossRef Tan SS, Rutten FFH, van Ineveld BM et al (2009) Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services. Eur J Health Econ 10:39CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, Chalmers TC, Dear KB, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F (1993) Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth 5(3):182–193CrossRef Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, Chalmers TC, Dear KB, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F (1993) Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth 5(3):182–193CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carr DB, Reines HD, Schaffer J, Polomano RC, Lande S (2005) The impact of technology on the analgesic gap and quality of acute pain management. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(3):286–291CrossRef Carr DB, Reines HD, Schaffer J, Polomano RC, Lande S (2005) The impact of technology on the analgesic gap and quality of acute pain management. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(3):286–291CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P (1999) Why do patients feel positive about patient-controlled analgesia? Anaesthesia. 54:386–389CrossRef Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P (1999) Why do patients feel positive about patient-controlled analgesia? Anaesthesia. 54:386–389CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Etches RC (1999) Patient-controlled analgesia. Surg Clin North Am 79:297–312CrossRef Etches RC (1999) Patient-controlled analgesia. Surg Clin North Am 79:297–312CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Standl T, Bannister J, Capdevila X et al (2010) Resource utilisation and costs associated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for post-operative pain management. Eur J Hosp Pharm Pract 16(1):3–12 Standl T, Bannister J, Capdevila X et al (2010) Resource utilisation and costs associated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for post-operative pain management. Eur J Hosp Pharm Pract 16(1):3–12
9.
go back to reference Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P (1998) Patient-controlled analgesia: an assessment by 200 patients. Anaesthesia. 53(3):216–221CrossRef Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P (1998) Patient-controlled analgesia: an assessment by 200 patients. Anaesthesia. 53(3):216–221CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Health Information and Quality Authority. Guidance on Budget Impact Analysis of Health Technologies in Ireland. Dublin: HIQA; 2015 Health Information and Quality Authority. Guidance on Budget Impact Analysis of Health Technologies in Ireland. Dublin: HIQA; 2015
Metadata
Title
A micro-costing study: comparing a standard intravenous patient-controlled analgesia system with a novel sublingual patient-controlled analgesia system
Publication date
01-11-2020
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02195-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 4/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.