Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Study of Deflections in Maxillary Major Connectors: A Finite Element Analysis

Authors: Nandakishore Bhojaraju, J. Srilakshmi, G. Vishwanath

Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The Major connector is the major component of the cast partial denture to which all other parts are directly or indirectly attached. It also provides cross arch stability to help resist displacement by functional stresses. The major connector should be rigid. A flexible major connector causes an unequal distribution of forces with changes in their intensity and may cause damage to the supporting structures. Thus rigidity is of paramount to resist flexing and torquing forces. The commonly used major connectors for the maxillary arch are Anteroposterior strap, palatal strap and complete palatal plate. Application of load on the prosthesis will result in deflection. The magnitude and direction of the deflection that the prosthesis undergoes depends on the rigidity of the major connector. (1) To determine the deflection seen in maxillary removable partial denture frameworks under simulated occlusal load. (2) To compare the rigidity and deflection characteristics of different maxillary major connectors used in maxillary Kennedy’s class I, class II, class III and class IV situations. A CT scan of human edentulous maxilla was taken and each section from the incisive foramen to the hamular notch was projected on the graph paper and three dimensional volumes were created from the connected successive profiles to define the final solid geometry of bone. Six framework models with different Maxillary major connectors such as Anteroposterior straps and complete palatal plate for Kennedy’s class I, class II, class III and class IV situations were created. Three Dimensional Finite Element Models corresponding to the geometric model were created using ANSYS 9.0 version. The model was assigned the material properties. A vertical biting force of 20 N was applied. The results showed maximum displacements were observed at the posterior edge of the saddle for all the frameworks. Anteroposterior palatal strap in class III and class IV situation showed the least deflection when compared to class I and class II (distal extension situation) Anteroposterior palatal strap is more rigid connector than the full palatal plate, single palatal strap, and U-shaped palatal strap and can be used in all situations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT (2005) Mc Crackens “removable partial prosthodontics” eleventh edition. Mosby, Missouri, p 458 Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT (2005) Mc Crackens “removable partial prosthodontics” eleventh edition. Mosby, Missouri, p 458
2.
go back to reference Phoenix RD, Cagna DR, DeFreest CF (2003) “Stewart’s clinical removable partial prosthodontics” third edition. Quintessence, Chicago, p 525 Phoenix RD, Cagna DR, DeFreest CF (2003) “Stewart’s clinical removable partial prosthodontics” third edition. Quintessence, Chicago, p 525
3.
go back to reference Miho E, Noriyuki W, Takashi O (2002) Finite element analysis of the deflections in major connectors for maxillary RPD’s. Int J Prosthodont 25(5):433–438 Miho E, Noriyuki W, Takashi O (2002) Finite element analysis of the deflections in major connectors for maxillary RPD’s. Int J Prosthodont 25(5):433–438
4.
go back to reference Zeev BU, Eitan M, Colin G, Tamar B (1999) “Stiffness of different designs and cross-sections of maxillary and mandibular major connectors of removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 81:526–532CrossRef Zeev BU, Eitan M, Colin G, Tamar B (1999) “Stiffness of different designs and cross-sections of maxillary and mandibular major connectors of removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 81:526–532CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig RG (2006) Craig’s “restorative dental materials” twelfth edition. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, p 632 Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig RG (2006) Craig’s “restorative dental materials” twelfth edition. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, p 632
6.
go back to reference Antony KK (1956) Effect of partial denture design on bilateral force distribution. J Prosthet Dent 6(3):373–385CrossRef Antony KK (1956) Effect of partial denture design on bilateral force distribution. J Prosthet Dent 6(3):373–385CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ben Z, Matalon S, Aviv I, Cardash HS (1989) Rigidity of major connectors when subjected to bending and torsion forces. J Prosthet Dent 62:557–562CrossRef Ben Z, Matalon S, Aviv I, Cardash HS (1989) Rigidity of major connectors when subjected to bending and torsion forces. J Prosthet Dent 62:557–562CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Arthur ML, Arthur JK (1973) Selection of a major connector for the extension base removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 30(1):102–105CrossRef Arthur ML, Arthur JK (1973) Selection of a major connector for the extension base removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 30(1):102–105CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study of Deflections in Maxillary Major Connectors: A Finite Element Analysis
Authors
Nandakishore Bhojaraju
J. Srilakshmi
G. Vishwanath
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0972-4052
Electronic ISSN: 1998-4057
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0237-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 1/2014 Go to the issue