Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

The Influences of Implant Angulations in One and Two Directions on the Retentive Properties of Overdenture Attachments: An In Vitro Study

Authors: Parsa Atashrazm, Mohammad Hossein Dashti, Leila Zamani Alavijeh, Samira Azarmaeh, Sayena Mahdizadeh

Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Implant alignment is an important factor in overdentures retained by solitary abutments. In this study, the effect of implant angulations in two directions, on the amount of retention of attachments was evaluated. Ninety models were divided into nine groups of two blocks each; one for two implants and one for two attachments. The implants were placed either parallel to, at 5°, or at 10° relative to the reference plane. The attachments were related to the implants with a 0, 5, or 10° angulations. The direction of the implant was either labial or distolabial. The initial and the subsequent retention values of each sample were measured after each 500 cycles of insertion and removal. The measurements were repeated for five consecutive 3,000 cycles, and the results were analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Group 9 with a 10° distolabial tilt of the implants and of their attachments showed the highest initial retention, whereas group 1 with a 0° angulations and parallel attachments showed the lowest (6.9 ± 0.28 and 3.88 ± 0.19 N, respectively). The initial retention and the final loss of retention was significantly higher in those groups with the distolabial tilt of the implants (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, it was demonstrated that the more divergent the implants and their retentive components, the higher their initial retention and the lower their final retention may be.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mericske-stern RD, Zarb GA (2004) clinical protocol for treatment with implant-supported overdentures. In: Bolender CE, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE (eds) Boucher’s prosthetic treatment for edentulous patients. Mosby, St. louis, pp 527–562 Mericske-stern RD, Zarb GA (2004) clinical protocol for treatment with implant-supported overdentures. In: Bolender CE, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE (eds) Boucher’s prosthetic treatment for edentulous patients. Mosby, St. louis, pp 527–562
2.
go back to reference Saowsky SJ (2001) Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 80:468–473CrossRef Saowsky SJ (2001) Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 80:468–473CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1:11–25 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1:11–25
4.
go back to reference Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr et al (1995) Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant over dentures, part 1: retentions, stability and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent 73:354–363PubMedCrossRef Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr et al (1995) Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant over dentures, part 1: retentions, stability and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent 73:354–363PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Walmsley AD (2002) Magnetic retention in prosthetic dentistry. Dent Update 29:428–433PubMed Walmsley AD (2002) Magnetic retention in prosthetic dentistry. Dent Update 29:428–433PubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Allen EP, Bayne SC, Brodine AH, Cronin RJ Jr, Donovan TE, Kois JC et al (2003) Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the committee on Scientific Investigation of the Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 90:50–80PubMedCrossRef Allen EP, Bayne SC, Brodine AH, Cronin RJ Jr, Donovan TE, Kois JC et al (2003) Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the committee on Scientific Investigation of the Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 90:50–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Petropoulos VC, Smith W (2002) Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 17:526–535 Petropoulos VC, Smith W (2002) Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 17:526–535
9.
go back to reference Federick DR, Caputo AA (1996) Effect of overdenture retention design and implant orientation on load transfer characteristic. J Prosthet Dent 76:624–632PubMedCrossRef Federick DR, Caputo AA (1996) Effect of overdenture retention design and implant orientation on load transfer characteristic. J Prosthet Dent 76:624–632PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference JN Walton, Huizinga SC, Peck CC (2001) Implant angulation, a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience. Int J Prosthodentic 14:523–530 JN Walton, Huizinga SC, Peck CC (2001) Implant angulation, a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience. Int J Prosthodentic 14:523–530
11.
go back to reference Fromentin O, Lassauzay C (2010) Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system. J Oral Rehabil 37:54–62PubMedCrossRef Fromentin O, Lassauzay C (2010) Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures – validation of an original force measurement system. J Oral Rehabil 37:54–62PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kampen V, Macrocune H (2003) Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachment in mandibular implant overdenture treatment an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 14:720–726CrossRef Kampen V, Macrocune H (2003) Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachment in mandibular implant overdenture treatment an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 14:720–726CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Michael P, Gulizio, John R et al (2005) Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont 14:3–11CrossRef Michael P, Gulizio, John R et al (2005) Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont 14:3–11CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nancy Dubois (2007) Retention values of locator attachment versus different implant angulation, p159 Nancy Dubois (2007) Retention values of locator attachment versus different implant angulation, p159
15.
go back to reference Al-Ghafli SA, Michalakis KX et al (2009) The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system. J Prosthet Dent 102:140–147PubMedCrossRef Al-Ghafli SA, Michalakis KX et al (2009) The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system. J Prosthet Dent 102:140–147PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H (2005) Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdentures attachments. Stomatologija Baltic Dental Maxillofac J 7:N4 Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H (2005) Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdentures attachments. Stomatologija Baltic Dental Maxillofac J 7:N4
17.
go back to reference Gamborena JI, Hazelton LR, NaBadalung D, Brudvik J (1997) Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont 10:123–130PubMed Gamborena JI, Hazelton LR, NaBadalung D, Brudvik J (1997) Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont 10:123–130PubMed
18.
go back to reference Sergio M, Geoffery A, John R et al (2009) Retention forces of spherical attachment as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures, an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 101:231–238CrossRef Sergio M, Geoffery A, John R et al (2009) Retention forces of spherical attachment as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures, an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 101:231–238CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kampen, Macrocune et al (2003) Retention and post insertion maintenance of bar- clip, ball and magnet attachment in mandibular implant overdenture treatment an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 14:720–726CrossRef Kampen, Macrocune et al (2003) Retention and post insertion maintenance of bar- clip, ball and magnet attachment in mandibular implant overdenture treatment an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implant Res 14:720–726CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wiemeyer AS, Agar JR, Kazemi RB (2001) Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism. J Prosthet Dent 86:434–437PubMedCrossRef Wiemeyer AS, Agar JR, Kazemi RB (2001) Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism. J Prosthet Dent 86:434–437PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Influences of Implant Angulations in One and Two Directions on the Retentive Properties of Overdenture Attachments: An In Vitro Study
Authors
Parsa Atashrazm
Mohammad Hossein Dashti
Leila Zamani Alavijeh
Samira Azarmaeh
Sayena Mahdizadeh
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0972-4052
Electronic ISSN: 1998-4057
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0272-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 1/2014 Go to the issue