Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Stroke | Study protocol

Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC): study protocol for a mixed-methods study to increase upper limb recovery after stroke with an intensive program coupled with a grasp count device

Authors: Lisa A. Simpson, Ruth Barclay, Mark T. Bayley, Sean P. Dukelow, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Carlo Menon, W. Ben Mortenson, Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Courtney L. Pollock, Sepideh Pooyania, Robert Teasell, Chieh-ling Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J. Eng

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Encouraging upper limb use and increasing intensity of practice in rehabilitation are two important goals for optimizing upper limb recovery post stroke. Feedback from novel wearable sensors may influence practice behaviour to promote achieving these goals. A wearable sensor can potentially be used in conjunction with a virtually monitored home program for greater patient convenience, or due to restrictions that preclude in-person visits, such as COVID-19. This trial aims to (1) determine the efficacy of a virtual behaviour change program that relies on feedback from a custom wearable sensor to increase use and function of the upper limb post stroke; and (2) explore the experiences and perceptions of using a program coupled with wearable sensors to increase arm use from the perspective of people with stroke.

Methods

This mixed-methods study will utilize a prospective controlled trial with random allocation to immediate or 3-week delayed entry to determine the efficacy of a 3-week behaviour change program with a nested qualitative description study. The intervention, the Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC) features feedback from a wearable device, which is intended to increase upper limb use post stroke, as well as 6 virtual sessions with a therapist. Sixty-four adults within 1-year post stroke onset will be recruited from seven rehabilitation centres. All outcomes will be collected virtually. The primary outcome measure is upper limb use measured by grasp counts over 3 days from the wearable sensor (TENZR) after the 3-week intervention. Secondary outcomes include upper limb function (Arm Capacity and Movement Test) and self-reported function (Hand Function and Strength subscale from the Stroke Impact Scale). Outcome data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention and at 2 months retention. The qualitative component will explore the experiences and acceptability of using a home program with a wearable sensor for increasing arm use from the point of view of individuals with stroke. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants after they have experienced the intervention. Qualitative data will be analysed using content analysis.

Discussion

This study will provide novel information regarding the efficacy and acceptability of virtually delivered programs to improve upper extremity recovery, and the use of wearable sensors to assist with behaviour change.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​govNCT04232163. January 18, 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Simpson LA, Hayward KS, McPeake M, Field TS, Eng JJ. Challenges of estimating accurate prevalence of arm weakness early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35:871–9.CrossRef Simpson LA, Hayward KS, McPeake M, Field TS, Eng JJ. Challenges of estimating accurate prevalence of arm weakness early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35:871–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87:88–97.CrossRef Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87:88–97.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.CrossRef Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3–10.CrossRef Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3–10.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84.CrossRef Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309–15.CrossRef Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309–15.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45:2053–8.CrossRef Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45:2053–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506.CrossRef Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cooper C, Gross A, Brinkman C, Pope R, Allen K, Hastings S, et al. The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2018;112:9–19.CrossRef Cooper C, Gross A, Brinkman C, Pope R, Allen K, Hastings S, et al. The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2018;112:9–19.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Da-Silva RH, Moore SA, Rodgers H, Shaw L, Sutcliffe L, van Wijck F, et al. Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercises after Stroke (WAVES): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1391–403.CrossRef Da-Silva RH, Moore SA, Rodgers H, Shaw L, Sutcliffe L, van Wijck F, et al. Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercises after Stroke (WAVES): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1391–403.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zhang W, Creswell J. The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care. 2013;51:e51–7.CrossRef Zhang W, Creswell J. The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care. 2013;51:e51–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Backman CL, Miller WC. Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: development, reliability, and validity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83405.CrossRef Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Backman CL, Miller WC. Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: development, reliability, and validity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83405.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Chan M. H-GRASP: the feasibility of an upper limb home exercise program monitored by phone for individuals post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:874–82.CrossRef Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Chan M. H-GRASP: the feasibility of an upper limb home exercise program monitored by phone for individuals post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:874–82.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour Change Wheel Book: A Guide To Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour Change Wheel Book: A Guide To Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
15.
go back to reference Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRef Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Simpson LA, Mow A, Menon C, Eng JJ. Preliminary examination of the ability of a new wearable device to capture functional hand activity after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:3643–6.CrossRef Simpson LA, Mow A, Menon C, Eng JJ. Preliminary examination of the ability of a new wearable device to capture functional hand activity after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:3643–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yang CL, Simpson LA, Eng JJ. Remote evaluation of upper extremity motor function following stroke: The Arm Capacity and Movement Test (ArmCAM). Am J Occup Ther. In Press. Yang CL, Simpson LA, Eng JJ. Remote evaluation of upper extremity motor function following stroke: The Arm Capacity and Movement Test (ArmCAM). Am J Occup Ther. In Press.
18.
go back to reference Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.CrossRef Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–40.CrossRef Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9:52.CrossRef Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9:52.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010;33:77–84.CrossRef Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010;33:77–84.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–907.CrossRef Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–907.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRef Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–11.CrossRef Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–11.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Morrow SL. Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:250–60.CrossRef Morrow SL. Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:250–60.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, et al. Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Stroke. 2020;51:2639–48.CrossRef Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, et al. Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Stroke. 2020;51:2639–48.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, Fini NA, Kuys SS, Borschmann K, et al. ACTIOnS Collaboration. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD012543 PMID: 30051462.PubMed Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, Fini NA, Kuys SS, Borschmann K, et al. ACTIOnS Collaboration. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD012543 PMID: 30051462.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sanders Q, Chan V, Augsburger R, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Do AH. Feasibility of wearable sensing for in-home finger rehabilitation early after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28:1363–72.CrossRef Sanders Q, Chan V, Augsburger R, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Do AH. Feasibility of wearable sensing for in-home finger rehabilitation early after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28:1363–72.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Yang C-L, Waterson S, Eng JJ. Implementation and evaluation of the virtual Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for individuals with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab083.CrossRef Yang C-L, Waterson S, Eng JJ. Implementation and evaluation of the virtual Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for individuals with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab083.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Yeh HJ, Chen TA, Cheng HC, Chou YJ, Huang N. Long-term rehabilitation utilization pattern among stroke patients under the National Health Insurance program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; Online ahead of print. PMID: 33782272. Yeh HJ, Chen TA, Cheng HC, Chou YJ, Huang N. Long-term rehabilitation utilization pattern among stroke patients under the National Health Insurance program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; Online ahead of print. PMID: 33782272.
Metadata
Title
Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC): study protocol for a mixed-methods study to increase upper limb recovery after stroke with an intensive program coupled with a grasp count device
Authors
Lisa A. Simpson
Ruth Barclay
Mark T. Bayley
Sean P. Dukelow
Bradley J. MacIntosh
Marilyn MacKay-Lyons
Carlo Menon
W. Ben Mortenson
Tzu-Hsuan Peng
Courtney L. Pollock
Sepideh Pooyania
Robert Teasell
Chieh-ling Yang
Jennifer Yao
Janice J. Eng
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Stroke
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06047-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue