Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Debate

Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?

Authors: Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Frede Olesen, Rikke Sand Andersen, Jens Sondergaard

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited.
The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use.

Discussion

Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited.

Summary

As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sandelowski M: Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000, 23: 334-340. 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M: Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000, 23: 334-340. 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Milne J, Oberle K: Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005, 32: 413-420.CrossRefPubMed Milne J, Oberle K: Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005, 32: 413-420.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Harper D: Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description. Nurs Outlook. 2005, 53: 127-133. 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Harper D: Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description. Nurs Outlook. 2005, 53: 127-133. 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dehlholm-Lambertsen B, Maunsbach M: [Qualitative methods in empiric health services research – five articles from Nordisk Medicin 1997] [In Danish]. The Research Unit for general Practice, Aarhus. 1998 Dehlholm-Lambertsen B, Maunsbach M: [Qualitative methods in empiric health services research – five articles from Nordisk Medicin 1997] [In Danish]. The Research Unit for general Practice, Aarhus. 1998
5.
go back to reference Malterud K: [Qualitative methods in medical research. An introduction] [In Norwegian]. 1996, Oslo: Tano Aschehoug Malterud K: [Qualitative methods in medical research. An introduction] [In Norwegian]. 1996, Oslo: Tano Aschehoug
6.
go back to reference Giorgi A: Description versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 1992, 23: 119-135. 10.1163/156916292X00090.CrossRef Giorgi A: Description versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 1992, 23: 119-135. 10.1163/156916292X00090.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J: Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997, 20: 169-177. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRefPubMed Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J: Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997, 20: 169-177. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thorne S: Interpretative Description. 2008, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 1 Thorne S: Interpretative Description. 2008, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 1
9.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative data analysis – An expanded sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2 Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative data analysis – An expanded sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2
10.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, 1 Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, 1
11.
go back to reference Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Jensen AB, Sondergaard J: Palliative care for cancer patients in a primary health care setting: Bereaved relatives' experience, a qualitative group interview study. BMC Palliat Care. 2008, 7: 1-10.1186/1472-684X-7-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Jensen AB, Sondergaard J: Palliative care for cancer patients in a primary health care setting: Bereaved relatives' experience, a qualitative group interview study. BMC Palliat Care. 2008, 7: 1-10.1186/1472-684X-7-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Weibull A, Olesen F, Neergaard MA: Caregivers' active role in palliative home care – to encourage or to dissuade? A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Palliat Care. 2008, 7: 15-10.1186/1472-684X-7-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weibull A, Olesen F, Neergaard MA: Caregivers' active role in palliative home care – to encourage or to dissuade? A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Palliat Care. 2008, 7: 15-10.1186/1472-684X-7-15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
Authors
Mette Asbjoern Neergaard
Frede Olesen
Rikke Sand Andersen
Jens Sondergaard
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009 Go to the issue