Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Stroke | Study Protocol

Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)

Authors: Anne Lieb, Brigitte Zrenner, Christoph Zrenner, Gábor Kozák, Peter Martus, Christian Grefkes, Ulf Ziemann

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stroke is a major cause of death and the most frequent cause of permanent disability in western countries. Repetitive transcranial brain stimulation (rTMS) has been used to enhance neuronal plasticity after stroke, yet with only moderate effect sizes. Here we will apply a highly innovative technology that synchronizes rTMS to specific brain states identified by real-time analysis of electroencephalography.

Methods

One hundred forty-four patients with early subacute ischemic motor stroke will be included in a multicenter 3-arm parallel, randomized, double-blind, standard rTMS and sham rTMS-controlled exploratory trial in Germany. In the experimental condition, rTMS will be synchronized to the trough of the sensorimotor µ-oscillation, a high-excitability state, over ipsilesional motor cortex. In the standard rTMS control condition the identical protocol will be applied, but non-synchronized to the ongoing µ-oscillation. In the sham condition, the same µ-oscillation-synchronized protocol as in experimental condition will be applied, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil. The treatment will be performed over five consecutive work days (1,200 pulses per day, 6,000 pulses total). The primary endpoint will be motor performance after the last treatment session as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity.

Discussion

This study investigates, for the first time, the therapeutic efficacy of personalized, brain-state-dependent rTMS. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with a high-excitability state will lead to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper extremity motor function than standard or sham rTMS. Positive results may catalyze a paradigm-shift towards personalized brain-state-dependent stimulation therapies.

Trial registration

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05600374) on 10–21-2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collaborators GBDN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–80.CrossRef Collaborators GBDN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–80.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Go As Fau - Mozaffarian D, Mozaffarian D Fau - Roger VL, Roger Vl Fau - Benjamin EJ, Benjamin Ej Fau - Berry JD, Berry Jd Fau - Borden WB, Borden Wb Fau - Bravata DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. (1524–4539 (Electronic)). Go As Fau - Mozaffarian D, Mozaffarian D Fau - Roger VL, Roger Vl Fau - Benjamin EJ, Benjamin Ej Fau - Berry JD, Berry Jd Fau - Borden WB, Borden Wb Fau - Bravata DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. (1524–4539 (Electronic)).
3.
go back to reference Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–60.CrossRefPubMed Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–60.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang YZ, Lu MK, Antal A, Classen J, Nitsche M, Ziemann U, et al. Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(11):2318–29.CrossRefPubMed Huang YZ, Lu MK, Antal A, Classen J, Nitsche M, Ziemann U, et al. Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(11):2318–29.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D, et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. (1759–4766 (Electronic)). Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D, et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. (1759–4766 (Electronic)).
7.
go back to reference Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474–528.CrossRefPubMed Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474–528.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zrenner C, Galevska D, Nieminen JO, Baur D, Stefanou MI, Ziemann U. The shaky ground truth of real-time phase estimation. Neuroimage. 2020;214: 116761.CrossRefPubMed Zrenner C, Galevska D, Nieminen JO, Baur D, Stefanou MI, Ziemann U. The shaky ground truth of real-time phase estimation. Neuroimage. 2020;214: 116761.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zrenner C, Desideri D, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U. Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(2):374–89.CrossRefPubMed Zrenner C, Desideri D, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U. Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(2):374–89.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schaworonkow N, Caldana Gordon P, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U, Bergmann TO, Zrenner C. mu-Rhythm extracted with personalized eeg filters correlates with corticospinal excitability in real-time phase-triggered EEG-TMS. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:954.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schaworonkow N, Caldana Gordon P, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U, Bergmann TO, Zrenner C. mu-Rhythm extracted with personalized eeg filters correlates with corticospinal excitability in real-time phase-triggered EEG-TMS. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:954.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Schaworonkow N, Triesch J, Ziemann U, Zrenner C. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(1):110–8.CrossRefPubMed Schaworonkow N, Triesch J, Ziemann U, Zrenner C. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(1):110–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bergmann TO, Lieb A, Zrenner C, Ziemann U. Pulsed facilitation of corticospinal excitability by the sensorimotor mu-alpha rhythm. J Neurosci. 2019;39(50):10034–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bergmann TO, Lieb A, Zrenner C, Ziemann U. Pulsed facilitation of corticospinal excitability by the sensorimotor mu-alpha rhythm. J Neurosci. 2019;39(50):10034–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Zrenner B, Zrenner C, Gordon PC, Belardinelli P, McDermott EJ, Soekadar SR, et al. Brain oscillation-synchronized stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in depression using real-time EEG-triggered TMS. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation. 2020;13(1):197–205.CrossRef Zrenner B, Zrenner C, Gordon PC, Belardinelli P, McDermott EJ, Soekadar SR, et al. Brain oscillation-synchronized stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in depression using real-time EEG-triggered TMS. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation. 2020;13(1):197–205.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bi G, Poo M. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139–66.CrossRefPubMed Bi G, Poo M. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139–66.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hussain SJ, Hayward W, Fourcand F, Zrenner C, Ziemann U, Buch ER, et al. Phase-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere is accurate after stroke. (1876–4754 (Electronic)). Hussain SJ, Hayward W, Fourcand F, Zrenner C, Ziemann U, Buch ER, et al. Phase-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere is accurate after stroke. (1876–4754 (Electronic)).
16.
go back to reference Leao MT, Naros G, Gharabaghi A. Detecting poststroke cortical motor maps with biphasic single- and monophasic paired-pulse TMS. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(4):1102–4.CrossRefPubMed Leao MT, Naros G, Gharabaghi A. Detecting poststroke cortical motor maps with biphasic single- and monophasic paired-pulse TMS. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(4):1102–4.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, et al. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(1):269–306.CrossRefPubMed Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, et al. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(1):269–306.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Du J, Tian L, Liu W, Hu J, Xu G, Ma M, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(11):1666–72.CrossRefPubMed Du J, Tian L, Liu W, Hu J, Xu G, Ma M, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(11):1666–72.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hosomi K, Morris S, Sakamoto T, Taguchi J, Maruo T, Kageyama Y, et al. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke upper limb paresis in the subacute period. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(7):1655–64.CrossRef Hosomi K, Morris S, Sakamoto T, Taguchi J, Maruo T, Kageyama Y, et al. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke upper limb paresis in the subacute period. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(7):1655–64.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Guan YZ, Li J, Zhang XW, Wu S, Du H, Cui LY, et al. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: a one-year longitudinal randomized trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017;23(12):940–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guan YZ, Li J, Zhang XW, Wu S, Du H, Cui LY, et al. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: a one-year longitudinal randomized trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2017;23(12):940–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Li J, Meng XM, Li RY, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Du YF. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11(10):1584–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li J, Meng XM, Li RY, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Du YF. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11(10):1584–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(5):858–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, et al. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(5):858–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.CrossRefPubMed Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(11):917–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(11):917–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Volz LJ, Rehme AK, Michely J, Nettekoven C, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR, et al. Shaping early reorganization of neural networks promotes motor function after stroke. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(6):2882–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Volz LJ, Rehme AK, Michely J, Nettekoven C, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR, et al. Shaping early reorganization of neural networks promotes motor function after stroke. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(6):2882–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1362–9.CrossRefPubMed Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1362–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Silva SM, Correa FI, Faria CD, Correa JC. Psychometric properties of the stroke specific quality of life scale for the assessment of participation in stroke survivors using the rasch model: a preliminary study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):389–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silva SM, Correa FI, Faria CD, Correa JC. Psychometric properties of the stroke specific quality of life scale for the assessment of participation in stroke survivors using the rasch model: a preliminary study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):389–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–6.CrossRefPubMed Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1146–51.CrossRefPubMed Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1146–51.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Womelsdorf T, Fries P. Neuronal coherence during selective attentional processing and sensory-motor integration. J Physiol Paris. 2006;100(4):182–93.CrossRefPubMed Womelsdorf T, Fries P. Neuronal coherence during selective attentional processing and sensory-motor integration. J Physiol Paris. 2006;100(4):182–93.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hensel L, Grefkes C, Tscherpel C, Ringmaier C, Kraus D, Hamacher S, et al. Intermittent theta burst stimulation applied during early rehabilitation after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12): e034088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hensel L, Grefkes C, Tscherpel C, Ringmaier C, Kraus D, Hamacher S, et al. Intermittent theta burst stimulation applied during early rehabilitation after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12): e034088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Lerner AJ, Wassermann EM, Tamir DI. Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012–2016: Results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(8):1409–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lerner AJ, Wassermann EM, Tamir DI. Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012–2016: Results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(8):1409–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Brain‐oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double‐blind three‐ arm parallel‐group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non‐ personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE)
Authors
Anne Lieb
Brigitte Zrenner
Christoph Zrenner
Gábor Kozák
Peter Martus
Christian Grefkes
Ulf Ziemann
Publication date
01-12-2023

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Neurology 1/2023 Go to the issue