Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Acta Neurologica Belgica
Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Stroke | Review article

The sensitivity of event-related potentials/fields to logopedic interventions in patients with stroke-related aphasia

Authors: Elissa-Marie Cocquyt, Marie Vandewiele, Cindy Bonnarens, Patrick Santens, Miet De Letter

Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Recovery of stroke-related aphasia can be affected by language therapy in the early and chronic stage. Objectively monitoring therapy-induced neuroplasticity is possible by several measurement techniques including electro- and magneto-encephalography. The obtained event-related potentials (ERPs) and fields (ERFs) provide insights into the neural basis of intact or deficient language processing with milliseconds precision. In this literature review, we highlight the sensitivity of ERPs and ERFs to logopedic interventions by providing an overview of therapy-induced changes in the amplitude, latency and topography of early and mid-to-late components.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Pedersen PM et al (1995) Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 38(4):659–666PubMedCrossRef
2.
Laska AC et al (2001) Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med 249(5):413–422PubMedCrossRef
3.
Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA (2009) Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 27(Suppl 1):204–214PubMedCrossRef
4.
Aerts A et al (2015) Aphasia therapy early after stroke: behavioural and neurophysiological changes in the acute and post-acute phases. Aphasiology 29(7):845–871CrossRef
5.
Zhang J et al (2017) Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 12(8):e0183349PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
7.
Hartwigsen G, Saur D (2019) Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia: insights into plasticity of the human language network. Neuroimage 190:14–31PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hamilton RH, Chrysikou EG, Coslett B (2011) Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain Lang 118(1–2):40–50PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Cocquyt EM et al (2017) The role of the right hemisphere in the recovery of stroke-related aphasia: a systematic review. J Neurolinguistics 44:68–90CrossRef
10.
Anglade C, Thiel A, Ansaldo AI (2014) The complementary role of the cerebral hemispheres in recovery from aphasia after stroke: a critical review of literature. Brain Inj 28(2):138–145PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kotz SA, Friederici AD (2003) Electrophysiology of normal and pathological language processing. J Neurolinguistics 16(1):43–58CrossRef
12.
Luck SJ (2014) An introduction to the event-related potential technique. The MIT Press, Cambridge
13.
Pulvermuller F, Shtyrov Y, Hauk O (2009) Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain Lang 110(2):81–94PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Friederici AD (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cognit Sci 6(2):78–84CrossRef
15.
Schechter I et al (2005) Impairments in generation of early-stage transient visual evoked potentials to magno- and parvocellular-selective stimuli in schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol 116(9):2204–2215PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Naatanen R, Kujala T, Winkler I (2011) Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 48(1):4–22PubMedCrossRef
17.
Scherg M, Von Cramon D (1986) Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 65(5):344–360PubMedCrossRef
18.
Hopf JM et al (2002) Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. J Neurophysiol 88(4):2088–2095PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gomez Gonzalez CM et al (1994) Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr 7(1):41–51PubMedCrossRef
20.
Naatanen R, Paavilainen P, Reinikainen K (1989) Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? Neurosci Lett 107(1–3):347–352PubMedCrossRef
21.
Paavilainen P et al (1989) Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 73(2):129–141PubMedCrossRef
22.
Näätänen R et al (1987) The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 40:125–131PubMed
23.
Dehaene-Lambertz G (1997) Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport 8(4):919–924PubMedCrossRef
24.
Aerts A et al (2013) Neurophysiological investigation of phonological input: aging effects and development of normative data. Brain Lang 125(3):253–263PubMedCrossRef
25.
Baldeweg T, Williams JD, Gruzelier JH (1999) Differential changes in frontal and sub-temporal components of mismatch negativity. Int J Psychophysiol 33(2):143–148PubMedCrossRef
26.
Rinne T et al (2000) Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources. NeuroImage 12(1):14–19PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1980) Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biol Psychol 11(2):99–116PubMedCrossRef
29.
Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D (2008) A cortical network for semantics: (de) constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(12):920–933PubMedCrossRef
30.
Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Hagoort P et al (2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304(5669):438–441PubMedCrossRef
32.
Aaltonen O et al (1993) Cortical differences in tonal versus vowel processing as revealed by an ERP component called mismatch negativity (MMN). Brain Lang 44(2):139–152PubMedCrossRef
33.
Ilvonen T et al (2004) The processing of speech and non-speech sounds in aphasic patients as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Neurosci Lett 366(3):235–240PubMedCrossRef
34.
Wertz RT et al (1998) 27th clinical aphasiology conference, Bigfork, Montana, USA, June 1997: a comparison of the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential to tone and speech stimuli in normal and aphasic adults. Aphasiology 12(7–8):499–507CrossRef
35.
Csépe V et al (2001) Impaired speech perception in aphasic patients: event-related potential and neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychologia 39(11):1194–1208PubMedCrossRef
36.
Aerts A et al (2015) Neurophysiological sensitivity for impaired phonological processing in the acute stage of aphasia. Brain Lang 149:84–96PubMedCrossRef
37.
Ilvonen TM et al (2003) Auditory discrimination after left-hemisphere stroke: a mismatch negativity follow-up study. Stroke 34(7):1746–1751PubMedCrossRef
38.
Becker F, Reinvang I (2007) Mismatch negativity elicited by tones and speech sounds: changed topographical distribution in aphasia. Brain Lang 100(1):69–78PubMedCrossRef
39.
Auther LL et al (2000) Relationships among the mismatch negativity (MMN) response, auditory comprehension, and site of lesion in aphasic adults. Aphasiology 14(5–6):461–470CrossRef
40.
Korpelainen JT et al (2000) Auditory P300 event related potential in minor ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 101(3):202–208PubMedCrossRef
41.
Onofrj M et al (1992) Delayed P3 event-related potentials (ERPs) in thalamic hemorrhage. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 83(1):52–61PubMedCrossRef
42.
43.
Dejanovic M et al (2015) The role of P300 event-related potentials in the cognitive recovery after the stroke. Acta Neurol Belg 115(4):589–595PubMedCrossRef
44.
Gummow LJ, Dustman RE, Keaney RP (1986) Cerebrovascular accident alters P300 event-related potential characteristics. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 63(2):128–137PubMedCrossRef
45.
D'Arcy RC et al (2003) Electrophysiological assessment of language function following stroke. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 114(4):662–672CrossRef
46.
Swaab T, Brown C, Hagoort P (1997) Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. J Cognitive Neurosci 9(1):39–66CrossRef
47.
Kawohl W et al (2010) Semantic event-related potential components reflect severity of comprehension deficits in aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 24(3):282–289PubMedCrossRef
48.
Pulvermuller F et al (2001) Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 32(7):1621–1626PubMedCrossRef
49.
Barbancho MA et al (2015) Bilateral brain reorganization with memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia: an ERP study. Brain Lang 145–146:1–10PubMedCrossRef
50.
MacGregor LJ et al (2015) Ultra-rapid access to words in chronic aphasia: the effects of intensive language action therapy (ILAT). Brain Topogr 28(2):279–291PubMedCrossRef
51.
Mohr B et al (2016) Hemispheric contributions to language reorganisation: an MEG study of neuroplasticity in chronic post stroke aphasia. Neuropsychologia 93:413–424PubMedCrossRef
52.
Lucchese G et al (2017) Therapy-induced neuroplasticity of language in chronic post stroke aphasia: a mismatch negativity study of (A) grammatical and meaningful/less mini-constructions. Front Human Neurosci 10:669CrossRef
53.
Becker F, Reinvang I (2007) Event-related potentials indicate bi-hemispherical changes in speech sound processing during aphasia rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 39(8):658–661PubMedCrossRef
54.
Pulvermüller F et al (2005) Therapy-related reorganization of language in both hemispheres of patients with chronic aphasia. Neuroimage 28(2):481–489PubMedCrossRef
55.
Shewan CM, Kertesz A (1980) Reliability and validity characteristics of the western aphasia battery (WAB). J Speech Hearing Disord 45(3):308–324PubMedCrossRef
56.
Wilson KR et al (2012) Changes in N400 topography following intensive speech language therapy for individuals with aphasia. Brain Lang 123(2):94–103PubMedCrossRef
57.
Huber W, Poeck K, Willmes K (1984) The aachen aphasia test. Adv Neurol 42:291–303PubMed
58.
E Kaplan, H Goodglass, S Weintraub (1983) Boston naming test. Philadelphia, Lee and Febiger Inc.
59.
De Renzi E, Vignolo LA (1962) The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain J Neurol 85:665–678CrossRef
60.
61.
Breier JI et al (2007) Changes in language-specific brain activation after therapy for aphasia using magnetoencephalography: a case study. Neurocase 13(3):169–177PubMedCrossRef
62.
Woodhead ZVJ et al (2017) Auditory training changes temporal lobe connectivity in ‘Wernicke’s aphasia’: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 88(7):586–594PubMedCrossRef
63.
Cornelissen K et al (2003) Adult brain plasticity elicited by anomia treatment. J Cognit Neurosci 15(3):444–461CrossRef
64.
Laganaro M et al (2008) Normalisation and increase of abnormal ERP patterns accompany recovery from aphasia in the post-acute stage. Neuropsychologia 46(8):2265–2273PubMedCrossRef
65.
Kiang M et al (2013) Test-retest reliability and stability of N400 effects in a word-pair semantic priming paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 124(4):667–674CrossRef
66.
Besche-Richard C et al (2014) Behavioral and brain measures (N400) of semantic priming in patients with schizophrenia: test-retest effect in a longitudinal study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 68(5):365–373PubMedCrossRef
67.
Lew HL, Gray M, Poole JH (2007) Temporal stability of auditory event-related potentials in healthy individuals and patients with traumatic brain injury. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 24(5):392–397
68.
Cassidy SM, Robertson IH, O'Connell RG (2012) Retest reliability of event-related potentials: evidence from a variety of paradigms. Psychophysiology 49(5):659–664PubMedCrossRef
69.
Ehlers MR, Herrero CL, Kastrup A, Hildebrandt H (2015) The P300 in middle cerebral artery strokes or hemorrhages: outcome predictions and source localization. Clin Neurophysiol 126(8):1532–1538PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The sensitivity of event-related potentials/fields to logopedic interventions in patients with stroke-related aphasia
Authors
Elissa-Marie Cocquyt
Marie Vandewiele
Cindy Bonnarens
Patrick Santens
Miet De Letter
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0300-9009
Electronic ISSN: 2240-2993
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01378-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Acta Neurologica Belgica 4/2020 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Isolated central acute vestibular syndrome following nucleus prepositus hypoglossi infarction

Neuro-Images

Acute medullary ischemia after radiofrequency facet denervation

Neuro-Images

Selective intra-arterial recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator in a case of acute posterior inferior cerebellar artery occlusion

Evidence- and experienced-based Neurology article

Different experiences of two PRRT2-associated self-limited familial infantile epilepsy

Review article

Oral appliances in the treatment of oromandibular dystonia: a systematic review

Original Article

Clinical and radiological characteristics and predictors of outcome of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a hospital-based study