Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Men’s Health (R Carrion and C Yang, Section Editors)

Strategies for Penile Prosthesis Placement in Peyronie’s Disease and Corporal Fibrosis

Authors: Faysal A. Yafi, Premsant Sangkum, Ian Ross McCaslin, Wayne J. G. Hellstrom

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Peyronie’s disease (PD) is a wound healing disorder of the tunica albuginea of the penis. PD is generally categorized into two phases: the early acute inflammatory and late chronic fibrotic. Surgical reconstruction is only recommended during the latter established phase. There are a variety of options when erections are functional. However, when erectile dysfunction is present, the gold standard treatment is the placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis with or without additional straightening procedures. General recommendations include that after implanting and inflating the cylinders, if a clinically significant curvature is present, manual modeling is performed. If a residual curve >30° remains after modeling, then various techniques, including plaque releasing incision, is the next step. Grafting can be considered if tunical defects are >2.0 cm. Causes of corporal fibrosis include complications from an infected implant such as explantation, priapism, penile trauma, and prolonged use of an intracavernosal injection agent. Implant placement in the setting of corporal fibrosis can be technically challenging. Available strategies include incision or excision of the scar, corporotomies with or without grafting, the use of cavernotomes, or other specialized dilators, implant downsizing, and transcorporeal resection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, et al. The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7):2359–74.PubMed Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, et al. The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7):2359–74.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mulhall JP, Schiff J, Guhring P. An analysis of the natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2006;175:2115–8.CrossRefPubMed Mulhall JP, Schiff J, Guhring P. An analysis of the natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2006;175:2115–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Psychological impact of Peyronie’s disease: a review. J Sex Med. 2013;10:653–60.CrossRefPubMed Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Psychological impact of Peyronie’s disease: a review. J Sex Med. 2013;10:653–60.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F, et al. EAU guidelines on penile curvature. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):543–52.CrossRefPubMed Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F, et al. EAU guidelines on penile curvature. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):543–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Levine LA, Dimitrou RJ. A surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(3):147–51.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Dimitrou RJ. A surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12(3):147–51.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Taylor FL, Abern MR, Levine LA. Predicting erectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease without inflatable penile prosthesis placement: vascular assessment and preoperative risk factors. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):296–301.CrossRefPubMed Taylor FL, Abern MR, Levine LA. Predicting erectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease without inflatable penile prosthesis placement: vascular assessment and preoperative risk factors. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):296–301.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Levine LA, Lenting E. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1997;158:2149–52.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Lenting E. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1997;158:2149–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mulhall JP, Anderson M, Parker M. A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes. J Sex Med. 2005;2:132–8.CrossRefPubMed Mulhall JP, Anderson M, Parker M. A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes. J Sex Med. 2005;2:132–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: a single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: a single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.CrossRefPubMed
10.•
go back to reference Levine LA, Burnett AL. Standard operating procedures for Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2013;10(1):230–44. Excellent review of the current literature on the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Burnett AL. Standard operating procedures for Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2013;10(1):230–44. Excellent review of the current literature on the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Anderson M. Penile prosthetic surgery for Peyronie’s disease: defining the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers. J Sex Med. 2004;1:318–21.CrossRefPubMed Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Anderson M. Penile prosthetic surgery for Peyronie’s disease: defining the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers. J Sex Med. 2004;1:318–21.CrossRefPubMed
12.•
go back to reference Zaid UB, Alwaal A, Zhang X, Lue TF. Surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(10):446. Thorough review of the current literature on the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed Zaid UB, Alwaal A, Zhang X, Lue TF. Surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(10):446. Thorough review of the current literature on the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Bergamaschi F, Rigatti P. Patient-partner satisfaction with semirigid penile prostheses for Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year follow-up study. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1819–21.PubMed Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Bergamaschi F, Rigatti P. Patient-partner satisfaction with semirigid penile prostheses for Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year follow-up study. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1819–21.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ghanem HM, Fahmy I, el-Meliegy A. Malleable penile implants without plaque surgery in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:171–3.CrossRefPubMed Ghanem HM, Fahmy I, el-Meliegy A. Malleable penile implants without plaque surgery in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:171–3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wilson SK, Delk 2nd JR. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–3.PubMed Wilson SK, Delk 2nd JR. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–3.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Chung E, Solomon M, Deyoung L, Brock GB. Comparison between AMS 700TM CX and ColoplastTM Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2012;10(11):2855–60. Head-to-head study showing similar positive outcomes with two different inflatable penile prostheses.CrossRefPubMed Chung E, Solomon M, Deyoung L, Brock GB. Comparison between AMS 700TM CX and ColoplastTM Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2012;10(11):2855–60. Head-to-head study showing similar positive outcomes with two different inflatable penile prostheses.CrossRefPubMed
17.•
go back to reference Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):27–34. Comprehensive review of the surgical literature for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):27–34. Comprehensive review of the surgical literature for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, Ingleright BJ. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders. J Urol. 1996;156:1633–5.CrossRefPubMed Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, Ingleright BJ. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders. J Urol. 1996;156:1633–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Long-term follow-up of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2001;165(3):825–9.CrossRefPubMed Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Long-term follow-up of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2001;165(3):825–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chung PH, Scott JF, Morey AF. High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed Chung PH, Scott JF, Morey AF. High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference DiBlasio CJ, Kurta JM, Botta S, et al. Peyronie’s disease compromises the durability and component-malfunction rates in patients implanted with an inflatable penile prosthesis. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):691–4.CrossRefPubMed DiBlasio CJ, Kurta JM, Botta S, et al. Peyronie’s disease compromises the durability and component-malfunction rates in patients implanted with an inflatable penile prosthesis. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):691–4.CrossRefPubMed
22.•
go back to reference Carson CC, Levine LA. Outcomes of surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2014;113(5):704–13. State-of-the-art review of the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed Carson CC, Levine LA. Outcomes of surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2014;113(5):704–13. State-of-the-art review of the surgical options for Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(4):411–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(4):411–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Egydio PH, Sansalone S. Peyronie’s reconstruction for maximum length and girth gain: geometrical principles. Adv Urol. 2008;205739. Egydio PH, Sansalone S. Peyronie’s reconstruction for maximum length and girth gain: geometrical principles. Adv Urol. 2008;205739.
25.•
go back to reference Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Sansalone S. Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie’s disease using circular and longitudinal grafting. BJU Int. 2013;111:E213–9. New interesting technique to preserve penile length and girth using geometrical principles.CrossRefPubMed Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Sansalone S. Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie’s disease using circular and longitudinal grafting. BJU Int. 2013;111:E213–9. New interesting technique to preserve penile length and girth using geometrical principles.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, et al. A new, innovative lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal-ventral patch graft: the ”sliding technique”. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2389–95.CrossRefPubMed Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, et al. A new, innovative lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal-ventral patch graft: the ”sliding technique”. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2389–95.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, et al. Simultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shortening. J Sex Med. 2012;9:316–21.CrossRefPubMed Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, et al. Simultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shortening. J Sex Med. 2012;9:316–21.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Shaeer O. Supersizing the penis following penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7):2608–16.PubMed Shaeer O. Supersizing the penis following penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7):2608–16.PubMed
29.•
go back to reference Shaeer O. Trans-corporal incision of Peyronie’s plaques. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):589–93. Innovative technique to incise a Peyronie’s plaque using endoscopic equipment.CrossRefPubMed Shaeer O. Trans-corporal incision of Peyronie’s plaques. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):589–93. Innovative technique to incise a Peyronie’s plaque using endoscopic equipment.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Silvani M, Pecoraro S, Zucchi A. Corporoplasty for induratio penis plastica with soft axial tutors, single relaxing albugineal incision and safenous grafting. A 3-year follow up. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012;84(2):84–8.PubMed Silvani M, Pecoraro S, Zucchi A. Corporoplasty for induratio penis plastica with soft axial tutors, single relaxing albugineal incision and safenous grafting. A 3-year follow up. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012;84(2):84–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Austoni E, Colombo F, Romano AL, et al. Soft prosthesis implant and relaxing albugineal incision with saphenous grafting for surgical therapy of Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year experience and long-term follow-up on 145 operated patients. Eur Urol. 2005;47(2):223–9.CrossRefPubMed Austoni E, Colombo F, Romano AL, et al. Soft prosthesis implant and relaxing albugineal incision with saphenous grafting for surgical therapy of Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year experience and long-term follow-up on 145 operated patients. Eur Urol. 2005;47(2):223–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Grasso M, Lania C, Fortuna F, Blanco S, Piacentini I. Preservation of cavernosal erectile function after soft penile prosthesis implant in Peyronie’s disease: long-term follow-up. Adv Urol. 2008;646052. Grasso M, Lania C, Fortuna F, Blanco S, Piacentini I. Preservation of cavernosal erectile function after soft penile prosthesis implant in Peyronie’s disease: long-term follow-up. Adv Urol. 2008;646052.
33.
go back to reference Zucchi A, Silvani M, Pecoraro S. Corporoplasty with small soft axial prostheses (VIRILIS I®) and bovine pericardial graft (HYDRIX®) in Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(2):275–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zucchi A, Silvani M, Pecoraro S. Corporoplasty with small soft axial prostheses (VIRILIS I®) and bovine pericardial graft (HYDRIX®) in Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(2):275–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
34.
go back to reference Levine LA, Greenfield JM, Estrada CR. Erectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease and a pilot study of the use of sildenafil citrate rehabilitation for postoperative erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2(2):241–7.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Greenfield JM, Estrada CR. Erectile dysfunction following surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease and a pilot study of the use of sildenafil citrate rehabilitation for postoperative erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2005;2(2):241–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.•
go back to reference Segal RL, Burnett AL. Surgical management for Peyronie’s disease. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(1):1–11. Good review of the surgical knowledge on Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Segal RL, Burnett AL. Surgical management for Peyronie’s disease. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(1):1–11. Good review of the surgical knowledge on Peyronie’s disease.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
go back to reference Levine LA, Rybak J. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):2112–7.CrossRefPubMed Levine LA, Rybak J. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):2112–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.•
go back to reference Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1880–9. Best available review on the different techniques used for penile prosthesis surgery with corporal fibrosis.CrossRefPubMed Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carballido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):1880–9. Best available review on the different techniques used for penile prosthesis surgery with corporal fibrosis.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Jordan GH, Angermeier KW. Preoperative evaluation of erectile function with dynamic infusion cavernosometry/cavernosography in patients undergoing surgery for Peyronie’s disease: correlation with postoperative results. J Urol. 1993;150(4):1138–42.PubMed Jordan GH, Angermeier KW. Preoperative evaluation of erectile function with dynamic infusion cavernosometry/cavernosography in patients undergoing surgery for Peyronie’s disease: correlation with postoperative results. J Urol. 1993;150(4):1138–42.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Rajpurkar AA, Li HH, Dhabuwala CCB. Penile implant success in patients with corporal fibrosis using multiple incisions and minimal scar tissue excision. Urology. 1999;54:145–7.CrossRefPubMed Rajpurkar AA, Li HH, Dhabuwala CCB. Penile implant success in patients with corporal fibrosis using multiple incisions and minimal scar tissue excision. Urology. 1999;54:145–7.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis. Urology. 2006;67:1072–5.CrossRefPubMed Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis. Urology. 2006;67:1072–5.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Shaeer OO, Shaeer AA. Corporoscopic excavation of the fibrosed corpora cavernosal for penile prosthesis implantation: optical corporotomy and trans-corporeal resection, Shaeer’s technique. J Sex Med. 2007;4:218–25.CrossRefPubMed Shaeer OO, Shaeer AA. Corporoscopic excavation of the fibrosed corpora cavernosal for penile prosthesis implantation: optical corporotomy and trans-corporeal resection, Shaeer’s technique. J Sex Med. 2007;4:218–25.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Shaeer O. Penile prosthesis implantation in cases of fibrosis: ultrasound-guided cavernotomy and sheathed trochar excavation. J Sex Med. 2007;4:809–14.CrossRefPubMed Shaeer O. Penile prosthesis implantation in cases of fibrosis: ultrasound-guided cavernotomy and sheathed trochar excavation. J Sex Med. 2007;4:809–14.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Sansalone S et al. Simultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with erectile dysfunction and severe fibrosis of the corpora cavernosa. J Sex Med. 2012;9(7):1937–44.CrossRefPubMed Sansalone S et al. Simultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with erectile dysfunction and severe fibrosis of the corpora cavernosa. J Sex Med. 2012;9(7):1937–44.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Summerton DJ, Terry TR, Delk JR, Wilson SK. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) into scarred corporeal bodies facilitated by the new AMS 700 CXR cylinders. BJU Int. 2005;95:102.CrossRef Summerton DJ, Terry TR, Delk JR, Wilson SK. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) into scarred corporeal bodies facilitated by the new AMS 700 CXR cylinders. BJU Int. 2005;95:102.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Knoll LD, Furlow WL, Benson Jr RC, Bilhartz DL. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with the use of a downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1995;153(2):366–7.CrossRefPubMed Knoll LD, Furlow WL, Benson Jr RC, Bilhartz DL. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with the use of a downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1995;153(2):366–7.CrossRefPubMed
46.•
go back to reference Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. Distal penile shaft reconstruction and reinforcement: the “double-windsocks” technique. J Sex Med. 2013;10(10):2571–8. Innovative technique using grafts to create neocorpora.PubMed Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. Distal penile shaft reconstruction and reinforcement: the “double-windsocks” technique. J Sex Med. 2013;10(10):2571–8. Innovative technique using grafts to create neocorpora.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Szostak MJ, DelPizzo JJ, Sklar GN. The plug and patch: a new technique for repair of corporal perforation during placement of penile prostheses. J Urol. 2000;163(4):1203–5.CrossRefPubMed Szostak MJ, DelPizzo JJ, Sklar GN. The plug and patch: a new technique for repair of corporal perforation during placement of penile prostheses. J Urol. 2000;163(4):1203–5.CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
go back to reference Kohler TS, Modder JK, Dupree JM, Bush NC, McVary KT. Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1474–8.CrossRefPubMed Kohler TS, Modder JK, Dupree JM, Bush NC, McVary KT. Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1474–8.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Knoll LD, Fisher J, Benson Jr RC, Bilhartz DL, Minich PJ, Furlow WL. Treatment of penile fibrosis with prosthetic implantation and flap advancement with tissue debulking. J Urol. 1996;156:394–7.CrossRefPubMed Knoll LD, Fisher J, Benson Jr RC, Bilhartz DL, Minich PJ, Furlow WL. Treatment of penile fibrosis with prosthetic implantation and flap advancement with tissue debulking. J Urol. 1996;156:394–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Borges F, Hakim L, Kline C. Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach. J Sex Med. 2006;3:550–3.CrossRefPubMed Borges F, Hakim L, Kline C. Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach. J Sex Med. 2006;3:550–3.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Wilson SK, Delk JR, Mulcahy JJ, Cleves M, Salem EA. Upsizing of inflatable penile implant cylinders in patients with corporal fibrosis. J Sex Med. 2006;3:736–42.CrossRefPubMed Wilson SK, Delk JR, Mulcahy JJ, Cleves M, Salem EA. Upsizing of inflatable penile implant cylinders in patients with corporal fibrosis. J Sex Med. 2006;3:736–42.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Swords K, Martinez DR, Lockhart JL, Carrion R. A preliminary report on the usage of an intracorporal antibiotic cast with synthetic high purity CaSO4 for the treatment of infected penile implant. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1162–9.CrossRefPubMed Swords K, Martinez DR, Lockhart JL, Carrion R. A preliminary report on the usage of an intracorporal antibiotic cast with synthetic high purity CaSO4 for the treatment of infected penile implant. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1162–9.CrossRefPubMed
54.•
go back to reference Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10(4):893–906. Excellent review of factors that cause patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction following penile prosthesis placement.CrossRefPubMed Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10(4):893–906. Excellent review of factors that cause patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction following penile prosthesis placement.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and "no touch" surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310–5.CrossRefPubMed Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and "no touch" surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310–5.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Lynch MJ, Scott GM, Inglis JA, Pryor JP. Reducing the loss of implants following penile prosthetic surgery. Br J Urol. 1994;73:423–7.CrossRefPubMed Lynch MJ, Scott GM, Inglis JA, Pryor JP. Reducing the loss of implants following penile prosthetic surgery. Br J Urol. 1994;73:423–7.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Mulcahy JJ, Carson 3rd CC. Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic-impregnated versus nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;60:167–72.CrossRefPubMed Mulcahy JJ, Carson 3rd CC. Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic-impregnated versus nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;60:167–72.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Radomski SB, Herschorn S. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection. J Urol. 1992;147:383–5.PubMed Radomski SB, Herschorn S. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection. J Urol. 1992;147:383–5.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Strategies for Penile Prosthesis Placement in Peyronie’s Disease and Corporal Fibrosis
Authors
Faysal A. Yafi
Premsant Sangkum
Ian Ross McCaslin
Wayne J. G. Hellstrom
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0491-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Current Urology Reports 4/2015 Go to the issue

New Imaging Techniques (A Rastinehad and S Rais-Bahrami, Section Editors)

Post Partial Nephrectomy Surveillance Imaging: an Evidence-Based Approach

Prostate Cancer (A Kibel, Section Editor)

Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

New Imaging Techniques (A Rastinehad and S Rais-Bahrami, Section Editors)

Contemporary Assessment of Renal Stone Complexity Using Cross-Sectional Imaging