Published in:
01-12-2011 | Nephrology – Original Paper
Steroid or tacrolimus withdrawal in renal transplant recipients using sirolimus
Authors:
Tainá Veras de Sandes Freitas, Kelly Miyuki Harada, Cláudia Rosso Felipe, Nelson Zocoler Galante, Edison Luiz Mandia Sampaio, Edson Ikehara, Fernando Alfieri, Hélio Tedesco-Silva Júnior, José Osmar Medina-Pestana
Published in:
International Urology and Nephrology
|
Issue 4/2011
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and steroid (ST) withdrawal are strategies under investigation to reduce long-term toxicities associated with current immunosuppressive regimens. We conducted a single center, prospective trial comparing the efficacy and safety of CNI or ST withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.
Methods
Forty-seven recipients of first renal transplant with non-HLA-identical living donors received sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC), and ST without induction therapy and were randomized to undergo ST (TAC/SRL group, n = 24) or TAC (SRL/ST group, n = 21) withdrawal 3 months after transplantation. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints were the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) and renal function at 12 months.
Results
No differences were observed in the incidence of BCAR (4.2% vs. 9.5%), graft (95.8% vs. 95.6%), and patient (95.8% vs. 95.6%) survivals or in renal function (60 ± 11.5 vs. 63.4 ± 10.5 ml/min, P = 0.361). Higher mean cholesterol concentration was observed in the SRL/ST group (191.9 ± 63.3 vs. 241.6 ± 61.5 mg/dl, P = 0.019). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 12.5% of patients in TAC/SRL group and 21.7% in SRL/ST group.
Conclusion
Within this short period of observation, our study was unable to detect any significant difference in major transplant outcomes comparing CNI and ST elimination strategies.