Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2018

01-05-2018 | Historical and Literary

Step by step guide to do a systematic review and meta-analysis for medical professionals

Authors: Y. Bashir, K. C. Conlon

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Systematic review and meta-analysis are statistical tools used to review researches performed on a same topic. They extract the collective effect of the studies performed on the topic of interest after statistically analysing the data of all the studies included.

Aims and objectives

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are getting more and more popular in the medical field. Statistics is never the strong aspect of medical professionals, and facing a large number of statistical tests and values could be quite confusing for them. The aim of this article is to simplify these two very important research modalities for medical professionals.

Conclusion

This article will provide a step-to-step guide for the medical colleagues to perform a meta-analysis if they are interested.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Evans D (2003) Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs 12(1):77–84CrossRefPubMed Evans D (2003) Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs 12(1):77–84CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1):1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1):1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M et al (2012) The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 1(1):2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M et al (2012) The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 1(1):2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Schmidt FL, Le H (2004) Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods. University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organization, Iowa City, IA 42242 Schmidt FL, Le H (2004) Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods. University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organization, Iowa City, IA 42242
7.
go back to reference Hedges LV (1984) Advances in statistical methods for meta-analysis. N Dir Eval 1984(24):25–42 Hedges LV (1984) Advances in statistical methods for meta-analysis. N Dir Eval 1984(24):25–42
8.
go back to reference Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA (2009) Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol 9(1):80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA (2009) Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol 9(1):80CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lewis J, Ellis S (1982) A statistical appraisal of post-infarction beta-blocker trials. Prim Cardiol (suppl 1):31–37 Lewis J, Ellis S (1982) A statistical appraisal of post-infarction beta-blocker trials. Prim Cardiol (suppl 1):31–37
10.
go back to reference McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA (1978) Variations of box plots. Am Stat 32(1):12–16 McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA (1978) Variations of box plots. Am Stat 32(1):12–16
11.
go back to reference Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZK, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95(2):147–160CrossRefPubMed Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZK, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95(2):147–160CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Martin S, Heneghan H, Winter D (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99(7):918–928CrossRefPubMed Martin S, Heneghan H, Winter D (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99(7):918–928CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157(1):132–140CrossRefPubMed Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157(1):132–140CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Higgins J, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558CrossRefPubMed Higgins J, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [journal article as teaching resource, deposited by John Flynn]. Br Med J 327:557–560CrossRef Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [journal article as teaching resource, deposited by John Flynn]. Br Med J 327:557–560CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Harbord RM (2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J 4:127–141 Sterne JA, Harbord RM (2004) Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J 4:127–141
17.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54(10):1046–1055CrossRefPubMed Sterne JA, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54(10):1046–1055CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129CrossRefPubMed Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Step by step guide to do a systematic review and meta-analysis for medical professionals
Authors
Y. Bashir
K. C. Conlon
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1663-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.