Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Status Epilepticus | Research article

One- to 10-year Status Epilepticus Mortality (SEM) score after 30 days of hospital discharge: development and validation using competing risks analysis

Authors: Prapassara Sirikarn, Porjai Pattanittum, Somsak Tiamkao

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency neurological disorder that affects quality of life and is associated with high mortality risk. Three scores have been developed to predict the risk of in-hospital death, but these scores are poor discrimination of mortality after discharge. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score for long-term mortality in SE patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using SE patient data collected from Thailand’s Universal Coverage Scheme database between the fiscal years of 2005 and 2015 and followed-up to 2016. Patients who died in hospital or within 30 days after discharge were excluded. Data were divided at random into either a derivation or validation set. A proportional hazards model for the sub-distribution of competing risks was fitted with backward stepwise method. The coefficients from the model were used to develop a point-based scoring system. The discrimination ability of the model was evaluated using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

A total of 20,792 SE patients (with ages ranging from the first day of life to 99 years at first admission) were randomly separated into two groups: 13,910 in the development group and 6882 in the validation group. A sub-distribution hazard model was used to determine nine predictors to be included in the final model, which was, in turn, used to develop the scoring system: age (0–19 points), male (two points), brain tumor (12 points), stroke (three points), cancer (11 points), diabetes (three points), chronic kidney disease (five points), pneumonia (five points), and urinary tract infection (four points). The possible total score ranged from zero to 64 and the cumulative incidence function was used to determine the probability of mortality associated with each total score within the first 10 years after the first admission. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the first to last time point ranged from 0.760 to 0.738.

Conclusion

A nine-factor risk score for predicting 10-year mortality in SE patients was developed. Further studies should focus on external validity and including a range seizure types and duration of seizure as the predictors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rui-Juan L, Wang Q, Cui T, Zhu F, Shao XQ. Status epilepticus-related etiology, incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2017;136:12–7.CrossRef Rui-Juan L, Wang Q, Cui T, Zhu F, Shao XQ. Status epilepticus-related etiology, incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2017;136:12–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shorvon SD, Andermann F, Guerrini R, editors. The causes of epilepsy : common and uncommon causes in adults and children. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Shorvon SD, Andermann F, Guerrini R, editors. The causes of epilepsy : common and uncommon causes in adults and children. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
3.
go back to reference Trinka E, Höfler J, Zerbs A. Causes of status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2012;53(Suppl 4):127–38.CrossRef Trinka E, Höfler J, Zerbs A. Causes of status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2012;53(Suppl 4):127–38.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tiamkao S, Pranbul S, Sawanyawisuth K, Thepsuthammarat K. A national database of incidence and treatment outcomes of status epilepticus in Thailand. Int J Neurosci. 2014;124:416–20.CrossRef Tiamkao S, Pranbul S, Sawanyawisuth K, Thepsuthammarat K. A national database of incidence and treatment outcomes of status epilepticus in Thailand. Int J Neurosci. 2014;124:416–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sutter R, Marsch S, Fuhr P, Rüegg S. Mortality and recovery from refractory status epilepticus in the intensive care unit: a 7-year observational study. Epilepsia. 2013;54:502–11.CrossRef Sutter R, Marsch S, Fuhr P, Rüegg S. Mortality and recovery from refractory status epilepticus in the intensive care unit: a 7-year observational study. Epilepsia. 2013;54:502–11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Malek AM, Wilson DA, Martz GU, Wannamaker BB, Wagner JL, Smith G, et al. Mortality following status epilepticus in persons with and without epilepsy. Seizure. 2016;42:7–13.CrossRef Malek AM, Wilson DA, Martz GU, Wannamaker BB, Wagner JL, Smith G, et al. Mortality following status epilepticus in persons with and without epilepsy. Seizure. 2016;42:7–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tiamkao S, Saybungkla P, Sirikarn P, Sawanyawisuth K. Group on behalf of IER. Predictors of long-term mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;84:114–7.CrossRef Tiamkao S, Saybungkla P, Sirikarn P, Sawanyawisuth K. Group on behalf of IER. Predictors of long-term mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;84:114–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. A clinical score for prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Neurology. 2006;66:1736–8.CrossRef Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. A clinical score for prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Neurology. 2006;66:1736–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leitinger M, Höller Y, Kalss G, Rohracher A, Novak HF, Höfler J, et al. Epidemiology-based mortality score in status Epilepticus (EMSE). Neurocrit Care. 2015;22:273–82.CrossRef Leitinger M, Höller Y, Kalss G, Rohracher A, Novak HF, Höfler J, et al. Epidemiology-based mortality score in status Epilepticus (EMSE). Neurocrit Care. 2015;22:273–82.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference González-Cuevas M, Santamarina E, Toledo M, Quintana M, Sala J, Sueiras M, et al. A new clinical score for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:1534–40.CrossRef González-Cuevas M, Santamarina E, Toledo M, Quintana M, Sala J, Sueiras M, et al. A new clinical score for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:1534–40.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aukland P, Lando M, Vilholm O, Christiansen EB, Beier CP. Predictive value of the status Epilepticus severity score (STESS) and its components for long-term survival. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:213.CrossRef Aukland P, Lando M, Vilholm O, Christiansen EB, Beier CP. Predictive value of the status Epilepticus severity score (STESS) and its components for long-term survival. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:213.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee Y, Choi EJ, Hong JP, Kang JK. Mortality, causes and predictors of death in status epilepticus (P5.087). Neurology. 2015;84(Suppl 14):P5.087. Lee Y, Choi EJ, Hong JP, Kang JK. Mortality, causes and predictors of death in status epilepticus (P5.087). Neurology. 2015;84(Suppl 14):P5.087.
13.
go back to reference Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation. 2016;133:601–9.CrossRef Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation. 2016;133:601–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Austin PC, Lee DS, D’Agostino RB, Fine JP. Developing points-based risk-scoring systems in the presence of competing risks. Stat Med. 2016;35:4056–72.CrossRef Austin PC, Lee DS, D’Agostino RB, Fine JP. Developing points-based risk-scoring systems in the presence of competing risks. Stat Med. 2016;35:4056–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.CrossRef Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JCM, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:555–61.CrossRef Wolbers M, Koller MT, Witteman JCM, Steyerberg EW. Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:555–61.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuk D, Varadhan R. Model selection in competing risks regression. Stat Med. 2013;32:3077–88.CrossRef Kuk D, Varadhan R. Model selection in competing risks regression. Stat Med. 2013;32:3077–88.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Blanche P, Kattan MW, Gerds TA. The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of t-year predicted risks. Biostatistics. 2018;20:347–57 doi:kxy006.CrossRef Blanche P, Kattan MW, Gerds TA. The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of t-year predicted risks. Biostatistics. 2018;20:347–57 doi:kxy006.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32:5381–97.CrossRef Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32:5381–97.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ong C-T, Sheu S-M, Tsai C-F, Wong Y-S, Chen SC-C. Age-dependent sex difference of the incidence and mortality of status epilepticus: a twelve year nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122350.CrossRef Ong C-T, Sheu S-M, Tsai C-F, Wong Y-S, Chen SC-C. Age-dependent sex difference of the incidence and mortality of status epilepticus: a twelve year nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122350.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Giovannini G, Monti G, Tondelli M, Marudi A, Valzania F, Leitinger M, et al. Mortality, morbidity and refractoriness prediction in status epilepticus: comparison of STESS and EMSE scores. Seizure. 2017;46:31–7.CrossRef Giovannini G, Monti G, Tondelli M, Marudi A, Valzania F, Leitinger M, et al. Mortality, morbidity and refractoriness prediction in status epilepticus: comparison of STESS and EMSE scores. Seizure. 2017;46:31–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: interpreting results and drawing conclusions, 12.4.1 confidence intervals. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 12 Nov 2018. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: interpreting results and drawing conclusions, 12.4.1 confidence intervals. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.​handbook.​cochrane.​org. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
Metadata
Title
One- to 10-year Status Epilepticus Mortality (SEM) score after 30 days of hospital discharge: development and validation using competing risks analysis
Authors
Prapassara Sirikarn
Porjai Pattanittum
Somsak Tiamkao
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1540-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Neurology 1/2019 Go to the issue