Published in:
01-11-2015 | Letter to the Editor
Standardizing Outcome Reporting in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery
Author:
Mikael Victorzon
Published in:
Obesity Surgery
|
Issue 11/2015
Login to get access
Excerpt
There is a variety in how outcomes following bariatric and metabolic surgery are reported, especially concerning postoperative morbidity. The Dindo-Clavien (D-C) classification [
1] of postoperative morbidity has gained wide acceptance in all fields of surgery and is used also by some authors in their outcome reports of bariatric/metabolic surgery, but not by all. Most studies report only less than 30 days morbidity leaving more long-term morbidity unreported. The lack of agreement on the definition of a surgical complication and what constitutes an actual surgical complication add to the confusion. This makes comparison of results difficult. Recently, the D-C classification was criticized by the clinical issue committee of the American Association for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) for not taking the time frame into account [
2]. This committee recommended the use of a simplified classification based on dividing morbidity in minor and major, divided further by the time frame in early and late morbidity with cutoff of 30 days. In my opinion, the classification of postoperative morbidity following bariatric surgery should not differ from the classification widely used following any other kind of surgery as doing so would only add to the confusion. However, I agree that the time frame is important and strongly encourages everyone to take time into account but to otherwise use the D-C classification. …