Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Letter to the Editor

Standardizing Outcome Reporting in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery

Author: Mikael Victorzon

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

There is a variety in how outcomes following bariatric and metabolic surgery are reported, especially concerning postoperative morbidity. The Dindo-Clavien (D-C) classification [1] of postoperative morbidity has gained wide acceptance in all fields of surgery and is used also by some authors in their outcome reports of bariatric/metabolic surgery, but not by all. Most studies report only less than 30 days morbidity leaving more long-term morbidity unreported. The lack of agreement on the definition of a surgical complication and what constitutes an actual surgical complication add to the confusion. This makes comparison of results difficult. Recently, the D-C classification was criticized by the clinical issue committee of the American Association for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) for not taking the time frame into account [2]. This committee recommended the use of a simplified classification based on dividing morbidity in minor and major, divided further by the time frame in early and late morbidity with cutoff of 30 days. In my opinion, the classification of postoperative morbidity following bariatric surgery should not differ from the classification widely used following any other kind of surgery as doing so would only add to the confusion. However, I agree that the time frame is important and strongly encourages everyone to take time into account but to otherwise use the D-C classification. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:587–606.CrossRefPubMed Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:587–606.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Standardizing Outcome Reporting in Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery
Author
Mikael Victorzon
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1838-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Obesity Surgery 11/2015 Go to the issue