Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Review

Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review

Authors: Susel Rosário, João A. Fonseca, Albert Nienhaus, José Torres da Costa

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers’ health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment.
The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented.
In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers’ health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation.
More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
International Labour Office (ILO). Psychosocial factors at work: Recognition and control. Occupational Safety and Health (Series No 56). Geneva: International Labour Office; 1986.
5.
6.
EU-OSHA. New forms of contractual relationships and the implications for occupational safety and health. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2002.
7.
EU-OSHA. Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational safety and health. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007.
8.
EU-OSHA. Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2014.
9.
10.
11.
Kompier MA. New system of work organization and worker´s health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(6):421–30.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Berkmann L, Kawachi I, Glymour M. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.CrossRef
13.
14.
European Comission. Interpretative Document of the Implementation of Council Directive 89/391/EEC in relation to Mental Health in the Workplace. Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion. 2014.
15.
16.
International Labour Office. ILO Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2001.
17.
PRIMA-EF. The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF. Nottingham: World Health Organization; 2008.
18.
Nübling M, Vomstein M, Haugh A, Nübling T, Adiwidjaja A. European-Wide Survey on Teachers Work Related Stress - Assessment, Comparison and Evaluation of the Impact of Psychosocial Hazards on Teachers at their Workplace. Brussels: European Trade Union Committee for Education; 2011.
19.
International Labour Organization. SOLVE integrating health promotion into workplace OSH policies: trainer's guide. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2012.
20.
21.
Greenhaus J, Allen T, Spector P. Health consequences of work-family conflict: The dark side of the work-family interface. In: Perrewe P, Ganster D, editors. Research in occupational stress and well being. Greenwich: JAI Press/Elsevier; 2006. p. 61–98.
22.
Hurrel L, Redline S, Simmons L. Measuring job stressors and strains: Where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:368–89.CrossRef
23.
24.
Cox T, Griffiths A, Rial-Gonzalez E. Research on work-related stress. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2000.
25.
Vahtera J, Pentti J, Kivimäki M. Sickness absence as a predictor of mortality among male and female employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(4):321–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Leka S, Jain A. Health impact of psychosocial hazard at work: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
27.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M. Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occup Med. 2010;60:277–86.CrossRef
28.
Rugulies R, Christensen K, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Bültmann U, Kristensen T. The contribution of the psychosocial work environment to sickness absence in human service workers: results of a 3 year follow-up. Work Stress. 2007;21(4):293–311.CrossRef
29.
Borritz M, Christensen K, Bültmann U, Rugulies R, Lund T, Andersen I, Villadsen E, Diderichsen L. Impact of burnout and psychosocial work characteristics on future long-term sickness absence. Prospective results of the Danish PUMA study among human service workers. Am Coll Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(10):964–70.CrossRef
30.
Nyberg A, Alfredsson L, Theorell T, Westerlund H, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M. Managerial leadership and ischaemic heart disease among employees: the Swedish WOLF study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:51–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Tsutsumi A, Kayaba K, Kario K, Ishikawa S. Prospective Study on Occupational Stress and Risk of Stroke. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(1):56–61.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Guimont C, Brisson C, Dagenais G, Milot A, Vézina M, Mâsse B, Moisan J, Laflamme N, Blanchette C. Effects of job strain on blood pressure: a prospective study of male and female white-collar workers. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(8):1436–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Sabbath E, Melchior M, Goldberg M, Zins M, Berkman L. Work and family demands: predictors of all-cause sickness absence in the GAZEL cohort. Eur J Public Health. 2011;22(1):101–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Aboa-Éboule C, Brisson C, Maunsell E, Bourbonnais R, Vézina M, Milot A, Dagenais G. Effort-Reward Imbalance at Work and Recurrent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A 4-Year Prospective Study of Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients. Am Psychosom Med. 2011;73(6):436–47.CrossRef
35.
Bellingrath S, Rohleder N, Kudielka B. Healthy working school teachers with high effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment show increase pro-inflammatory immune activity and a dampened innate immune defence. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24(8):1332–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Tsai SS, Lai CH, Shih TS, Lin MH, Liou SH. High Job Strain is associated with inflammatory markers of disease in young long-haul bus drivers. Am Psychol Assoc. 2014;3(19):336–47.
37.
Crain T, Hammer L, Bodner T, Kossek E, Moen P, Lilienthal R. Work-family conflict, family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB), and sleep outcomes. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):155–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Kristensen T, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) – a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:438–49.CrossRefPubMed
39.
EU-OSHA. The 2016 Management Plan. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2016.
40.
International Labour Office. Prevention of occupational diseases. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2013.
41.
European Forum of the insurance against accidents at work and occupational diseases. (EUROGIP). What recognition of work-related mental disorders? A study on 10 European countries. EUROGIP Study Report; 2013.
42.
International Labour Office. List of Occupational Diseases (revised 2010): Identification and recognition of occupational diseases: Criteria for incorporating diseases in the ILO list of occupational diseases, Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 74. Geneva: ILO; 2010.
43.
44.
Rugulies R. Studying the effect of psychosocial work environment on risk of ill-health: towards a more comprehensive assessment of working conditions. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:187–92.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Kivimäki M, Ferrie J, Shipley M, Brunner E, Vahtera J, Marmot M. Work stress, weight gain and weight loss: evidence for bidirectional effects of job strain on body mass index in the Whitehall II study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:982–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standardized assessment of psychosocial factors and their influence on medically confirmed health outcomes in workers: a systematic review
Authors
Susel Rosário
João A. Fonseca
Albert Nienhaus
José Torres da Costa
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0106-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2016 Go to the issue

Methodology

Identification of metal sensitization in sarcoid-like metal-exposed patients by the MELISA® lymphocyte proliferation test — a pilot study

Research

Total and respirable dust exposures among carpenters and demolition workers during indoor work in Denmark

Research

Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers at a hospital in Naples, Italy, a low-incidence country

Research

Occupational injuries among building construction workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Methodology

Use of an audience response system to maximise response rates and expedite a modified Delphi process for consensus on occupational health

Research

Work-related diabetes distress among Finnish workers with type 1 diabetes: a national cross-sectional survey