Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Total and respirable dust exposures among carpenters and demolition workers during indoor work in Denmark

Authors: Lilli Kirkeskov, Dorte Jessing Agerby Hanskov, Charlotte Brauer

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Within the construction industry the risk of lung disorders depends on the specific professions probably due to variations in the levels of dust exposure, and with dust levels depending on the work task and job function. We do not know the extent of exposure in the different professions or the variation between the different work tasks. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess if there were differences in dust exposure between carpenters and demolition workers who were expected to have low and high dust exposure, respectively.

Methods

Through interviews of key persons in the construction industry the most common work tasks were selected, and the concentration of dust during these tasks (indoors) were measured by personal sampling varying between 4 and 6 h of a working day. In total 38 measurements of total dust, and 25 of respirable dust on seven different work tasks were carried out for carpenters and 20 measurements of total dust, 11 of respirable dust and 11 of respirable crystalline silica dust on four different works tasks for demolition workers. Dust measurements were tested for differences using linear regression, t-test and one-way ANOVA.

Results

For carpenters the geometric mean for all the measurements of total dust was 1.26 mg/m3 (geometric standard deviation 2.90) and the respirable dust was 0.27 mg/m3 (geometric standard deviation 2.13). For demolition workers the geometric mean of total dust for all the measurements was 22.3 mg/m3 (geometric standard deviation 11.6) and the respirable dust was 1.06 mg/m3 (geometric standard deviation 5.64).
The mean difference between total dust for demolition workers and carpenters was 11.4 (95 % confidence interval 3.46–37.1) mg/m3. The mean difference between respirable dust for demolition workers and carpenters was 3.90 (95 % confidence interval 1.13–13.5) mg/m3.
Dust exposure varied depending on work task for both professions. The dustiest work occurred during demolition, especially when it was done manually.
Only few workers used personal respiratory protection and only while performing the dustiest work.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the exposure to dust and especially total dust was much higher for demolition workers compared to carpenters.

Trial registration

(ISRCTN registry): The study is not a clinical trial and are thus not registered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Omland Ø, Würtz ET, Aasen TB, et al. Occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(1):19–35.CrossRefPubMed Omland Ø, Würtz ET, Aasen TB, et al. Occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(1):19–35.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hanskov D, Brauer C, Breinegaard N, et al. Respiratory symptoms and lung function among Danish construction workers. A cross-sectional study. Int J Respir Pulm Med. 2015;2(4):1–6. Hanskov D, Brauer C, Breinegaard N, et al. Respiratory symptoms and lung function among Danish construction workers. A cross-sectional study. Int J Respir Pulm Med. 2015;2(4):1–6.
5.
go back to reference Bagschik U, Böckler M, Chromy W, et al. Exposure to quartz at the work place. BGIA-Report 8/2006e 2008:1–154. Bagschik U, Böckler M, Chromy W, et al. Exposure to quartz at the work place. BGIA-Report 8/2006e 2008:1–154.
6.
go back to reference Christensson B, Ostlund G, Alvarez E, et al. Effektiva åtgärder mot damm på byggarbetsplatser. Etapp 2. [Effective measures aganst dust at construction sites] [in Swedish]. IVL. Stockholm: Svenska Miljöinstitutet; 2012. Christensson B, Ostlund G, Alvarez E, et al. Effektiva åtgärder mot damm på byggarbetsplatser. Etapp 2. [Effective measures aganst dust at construction sites] [in Swedish]. IVL. Stockholm: Svenska Miljöinstitutet; 2012.
7.
go back to reference Karlsson A, Christensson B. Effektiva åtgärder mot damm på byggarbetsplatser. Etapp 1 [Effective measures against dust at construction sites stage 1] [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Svenska Miljöinstitutet; 2008. p. 1–47. Karlsson A, Christensson B. Effektiva åtgärder mot damm på byggarbetsplatser. Etapp 1 [Effective measures against dust at construction sites stage 1] [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Svenska Miljöinstitutet; 2008. p. 1–47.
8.
go back to reference Higgins R, Dewell P. A gravimetric size selecting personal dust sampler. In: Davies CN, editor. Inhaled Particles and Vapours II. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967. p. 575–86.CrossRef Higgins R, Dewell P. A gravimetric size selecting personal dust sampler. In: Davies CN, editor. Inhaled Particles and Vapours II. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967. p. 575–86.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anonymous. Working Environment Authoritues Guidelines. Substances and Materials. C.0.1. Danish Working Environment Authority 2007;C.1.0.:1–84. Anonymous. Working Environment Authoritues Guidelines. Substances and Materials. C.0.1. Danish Working Environment Authority 2007;C.1.0.:1–84.
10.
go back to reference Silica. Crystalline by IR: Method 7602. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM) 2003 (3):1–6. Silica. Crystalline by IR: Method 7602. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM) 2003 (3):1–6.
11.
go back to reference Wiebert P, Lönn M, Fremling K, et al. Occupational exposure to particles and incidence of acute myocardial infarction and other ischaemic heart disease. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:651–7.CrossRefPubMed Wiebert P, Lönn M, Fremling K, et al. Occupational exposure to particles and incidence of acute myocardial infarction and other ischaemic heart disease. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:651–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chrisholm J. Respirable dust and respirable silica concentrations from construction activities. Indoor Built Environ. 1999;8:94–106.CrossRef Chrisholm J. Respirable dust and respirable silica concentrations from construction activities. Indoor Built Environ. 1999;8:94–106.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lumens M, Spee T. Determinants of exposure to respirable quartz dust in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001;45(7):585–95.CrossRefPubMed Lumens M, Spee T. Determinants of exposure to respirable quartz dust in the construction industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001;45(7):585–95.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rushton L. Review of literature on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and occupational exposure to Silica. London: Imperial College London; 2007. p. 1–53. Rushton L. Review of literature on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and occupational exposure to Silica. London: Imperial College London; 2007. p. 1–53.
15.
go back to reference Rushton L. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and occupational exposure to silica. Rev Environ Health. 2007;22(4):255–72.CrossRefPubMed Rushton L. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and occupational exposure to silica. Rev Environ Health. 2007;22(4):255–72.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mirzaee R, Kebriaei A, Hashemi S, et al. Effects of exposure to Portland and cement dust on lung function in Portland cement factory workers in Kash, Iran. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2008;5:201–6. Mirzaee R, Kebriaei A, Hashemi S, et al. Effects of exposure to Portland and cement dust on lung function in Portland cement factory workers in Kash, Iran. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2008;5:201–6.
17.
go back to reference Mwaiselage J, Moen B, Bråtveit M. Acute respiratory health effects among cement factory workers in Tanzania: an evaluation of a simple health surveillance tool. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:49–56.CrossRefPubMed Mwaiselage J, Moen B, Bråtveit M. Acute respiratory health effects among cement factory workers in Tanzania: an evaluation of a simple health surveillance tool. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:49–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Notø HP, Nordby K-C, Eduard W. Relationships between personal measurements of ‘total’ dust, respirable, thoracic, and inhalable aerosol fractions in the cement production industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60(4):453–66. Notø HP, Nordby K-C, Eduard W. Relationships between personal measurements of ‘total’ dust, respirable, thoracic, and inhalable aerosol fractions in the cement production industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60(4):453–66.
19.
go back to reference OSHA. Assigned protection factors for revised respiratory protection standard. OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration U S Department of Labor 2009;OSHA 3352–02:1–47. OSHA. Assigned protection factors for revised respiratory protection standard. OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration U S Department of Labor 2009;OSHA 3352–02:1–47.
Metadata
Title
Total and respirable dust exposures among carpenters and demolition workers during indoor work in Denmark
Authors
Lilli Kirkeskov
Dorte Jessing Agerby Hanskov
Charlotte Brauer
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0134-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2016 Go to the issue