Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Spinal Anesthesia | Research article

Dural sac cross-sectional area is a highly effective parameter for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective, double blinded, randomized study

Authors: Wei Bing Wang, Ai Jiao Sun, Hong Ping Yu, Jing Chun Dong, Huang Xu

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Spinal anesthesia is optimal choice for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), but the sensory block should not cross the T10 level. With advancing age, the sensory blockade level increases after spinal injection in some patients with spinal canal stenosis. We optimize the dose of spinal anesthesia according to the decreased ratio of the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA), the purpose of this study is to hypothesis that if DSCSA is an effective parameter to modify the dosage of spinal anesthetics to achieve a T10 blockade in geriatric patients undergoing TURP.

Methods

Sixty geriatric patients schedule for TURP surgery were enrolled in this study. All subjects were randomized divided into two groups, the ultrasound (group U) and the control (group C) groups, patient receive either a dose of 2 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine in group C, or a modified dose of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine in group U. We measured the sagittal anteroposterior diameter (D) of the dural sac at the L3–4 level with ultrasound, and calculated the approximate DSCSA (A) according to the following formula: A = π(D/2)2, ( π = 3.14). The modified dosage of bupivacaine was adjusted according to the decreased ratio of the DSCSA.

Results

The cephalad spread of the sensory blockade level was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in group U (T10, range T7–T12) compared with group C (T3, range T2–T9). The dosage of bupivacaine was significantly decreased in group U compared with group C (P < 0.001). The regression times of the two segments were delay in group U compared with group C (P < 0.001). The maximal decrease in MAP was significantly higher in the group C than in group U after spinal injection (P < 0.001), without any modifications HR in either group. Eight patients in group C and two patients in group U required ephedrine (P = 0.038).

Conclusions

The DSCSA is a highly effective parameter for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing TURP, a modified dose of local anesthetic is a critical factor for controlling the sensory level.

Trial registration

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR1800015566​).on 8, April, 2018.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arrighi HM, Metter EJ, Guess HA, Fozzard JL. Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia and risk of prostatectomy. The Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Urology. 1991;38(1 Suppl):4–8.CrossRef Arrighi HM, Metter EJ, Guess HA, Fozzard JL. Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia and risk of prostatectomy. The Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Urology. 1991;38(1 Suppl):4–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132:474–9.CrossRef Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132:474–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim SY, Cho JE, Hong JY, Koo BN, Kim JM, Kil HK. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil in low-dose dilute bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:750–4.CrossRef Kim SY, Cho JE, Hong JY, Koo BN, Kim JM, Kil HK. Comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil in low-dose dilute bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:750–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hong JY, Yang SC, Ahn S, Kil HK. Preoperative comorbidities and relationship of comorbidities with postoperative complications in patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection. J Urol. 2011;185:1374–8.CrossRef Hong JY, Yang SC, Ahn S, Kil HK. Preoperative comorbidities and relationship of comorbidities with postoperative complications in patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection. J Urol. 2011;185:1374–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tuominan M. Bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:1.CrossRef Tuominan M. Bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:1.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rooke GA, Freund PR, Jacobson AF. Hemodynamic response and change in organ blood volume during spinal anesthesia in elderly men with cardiac disease. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:99–105.PubMed Rooke GA, Freund PR, Jacobson AF. Hemodynamic response and change in organ blood volume during spinal anesthesia in elderly men with cardiac disease. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:99–105.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cook DJ, Rooke GA. Priorities in perioperative geriatrics. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(6):1823–36.CrossRef Cook DJ, Rooke GA. Priorities in perioperative geriatrics. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(6):1823–36.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference O'Donnell A, Foo I. Anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9:92–6.CrossRef O'Donnell A, Foo I. Anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9:92–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lynch M, Anson K. Time to rebrand transurethral resection of the prostate? Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16:20–4.PubMed Lynch M, Anson K. Time to rebrand transurethral resection of the prostate? Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16:20–4.PubMed
10.
go back to reference McGowan-Smyth S, Vasdev N, Gowrie-Mohan S. Spinal anesthesia facilitates the early recognition of TUR syndrome. Curr Urol. 2016;9(2):57–61.CrossRef McGowan-Smyth S, Vasdev N, Gowrie-Mohan S. Spinal anesthesia facilitates the early recognition of TUR syndrome. Curr Urol. 2016;9(2):57–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Demirel I, Ozer AB, Bayar MK, Erhan OL. TURP syndrome and severe hyponatremia under general anaesthesia. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr-2012.CrossRef Demirel I, Ozer AB, Bayar MK, Erhan OL. TURP syndrome and severe hyponatremia under general anaesthesia. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr-2012.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Simon MJ, Veering BT, Stienstra R, van Kleef JW, Burm AG. The effects of age on neural blockade and hemodynamic changes after epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1325–30.CrossRef Simon MJ, Veering BT, Stienstra R, van Kleef JW, Burm AG. The effects of age on neural blockade and hemodynamic changes after epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1325–30.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsui BC, Wagner A, Finucane B. Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:895–910.CrossRef Tsui BC, Wagner A, Finucane B. Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:895–910.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chin KJ, Perlas A. Ultrasonography of the lumbar spine for neuraxial and lumbar plexus blocks. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(5):567–72.CrossRef Chin KJ, Perlas A. Ultrasonography of the lumbar spine for neuraxial and lumbar plexus blocks. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(5):567–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lau YYO, Lee RKL, Griffith JF, Chan CLY, Law SW, Kwok KO. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(10):2666–75.CrossRef Lau YYO, Lee RKL, Griffith JF, Chan CLY, Law SW, Kwok KO. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(10):2666–75.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lim YS, Mun JU, Seo MS, Sang BH, Bang YS, Kang KN, Koh JW, Kim YU. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e9087.CrossRef Lim YS, Mun JU, Seo MS, Sang BH, Bang YS, Kang KN, Koh JW, Kim YU. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e9087.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Doger C, Yüksel BE, Canoler O, Ornek D, Emre C, Kahveci K. Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(2):149–53.CrossRef Doger C, Yüksel BE, Canoler O, Ornek D, Emre C, Kahveci K. Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(2):149–53.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yabuki S, Fukumori N, Takegami M, Onishi Y, Otani K, Sekiguchi M, Wakita T, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S, Konno S. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, using the diagnostic support tool, and correlated factors in Japan: a population-based study. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(6):893–900.CrossRef Yabuki S, Fukumori N, Takegami M, Onishi Y, Otani K, Sekiguchi M, Wakita T, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S, Konno S. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, using the diagnostic support tool, and correlated factors in Japan: a population-based study. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(6):893–900.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wu L, Cruz R. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-2018 Oct 27. Wu L, Cruz R. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-2018 Oct 27.
20.
go back to reference Kooger Infante NE, Van Gessel E, Forster A, Gamulin Z. Extent of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia influences the duration of spinal block. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1319–23.CrossRef Kooger Infante NE, Van Gessel E, Forster A, Gamulin Z. Extent of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia influences the duration of spinal block. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1319–23.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pitkanen M. Spinal (subarachnoid) blockade. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and pain medicine. In: Cousins MJ, Carr DB, Horlocker TT, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Wolters Kluwer Health, vol. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 221. Pitkanen M. Spinal (subarachnoid) blockade. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and pain medicine. In: Cousins MJ, Carr DB, Horlocker TT, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Wolters Kluwer Health, vol. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 221.
22.
go back to reference Ruppen W, Steiner LA, Drewe J, Hauenstein L, Brugger S, Seeberger MD. Bupivacaine concentrations in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients during spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:832–8.CrossRef Ruppen W, Steiner LA, Drewe J, Hauenstein L, Brugger S, Seeberger MD. Bupivacaine concentrations in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid of patients during spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:832–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Veering BT, Immink-Speet TT, Burm AG, Stienstra R, van Kleef JW. Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effects of duration spent in the sitting position. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:738–42.CrossRef Veering BT, Immink-Speet TT, Burm AG, Stienstra R, van Kleef JW. Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effects of duration spent in the sitting position. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:738–42.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee SS, Jha AK, Basu S. Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an additive to low-dose bupivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(12):1002–8.CrossRef Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee SS, Jha AK, Basu S. Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an additive to low-dose bupivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(12):1002–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ozbek H, Deniz MN, Erakgun A, Erhan E. Comparison of 75 and 150 μg doses of intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia. J Opioid Manag. 2013;9(6):415–20.CrossRef Ozbek H, Deniz MN, Erakgun A, Erhan E. Comparison of 75 and 150 μg doses of intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia. J Opioid Manag. 2013;9(6):415–20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Akan B, Yagan O, Bilal B, Erdem D, Gogus N. Comparison of levobupivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(5):378–82.PubMedPubMedCentral Akan B, Yagan O, Bilal B, Erdem D, Gogus N. Comparison of levobupivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(5):378–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Kaur N, Goneppanavar U, Venkateswaran R, Iyer SS. Comparative effects of buprenorphine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia in elderly male patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostrate: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(4):886–91.CrossRef Kaur N, Goneppanavar U, Venkateswaran R, Iyer SS. Comparative effects of buprenorphine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia in elderly male patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostrate: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(4):886–91.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Macedo LG, Bodnar A, Battie MC. A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction. Spine J. 2016;16:884–8.CrossRef Macedo LG, Bodnar A, Battie MC. A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction. Spine J. 2016;16:884–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dural sac cross-sectional area is a highly effective parameter for spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective, double blinded, randomized study
Authors
Wei Bing Wang
Ai Jiao Sun
Hong Ping Yu
Jing Chun Dong
Huang Xu
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01059-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue