Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Research Article

Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension

Authors: Simon Grant, Miriam L. Conway

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Proficient (fast, accurate, precise) hand actions for reaching-to-grasp 3D objects are known to benefit significantly from the use of binocular vision compared to one eye alone. We examined whether these binocular advantages derive from increased reliability in encoding the goal object’s properties for feedforward planning of prehension movements or from enhanced feedback mediating their online control. Adult participants reached for, precision grasped and lifted cylindrical table-top objects (two sizes, 2 distances) using binocular vision or only their dominant/sighting eye or their non-dominant eye to program and fully execute their movements or using each of the three viewing conditions only to plan their reach-to-grasp during a 1 s preview, with vision occluded just before movement onset. Various kinematic measures of reaching and grasping proficiency, including corrective error rates, were quantified and compared by view, feedback and object type. Some significant benefits of binocular over monocular vision when they were just available for pre-movement planning were retained for the reach regardless of target distance, including higher peak velocities, straighter paths and shorter low velocity approach times, although these latter were contaminated by more velocity corrections and by poorer coordination with object contact. By contrast, virtually all binocular advantages for grasping, including improvements in peak grip aperture scaling, the accuracy and precision of digit placements at object contact and shorter grip application times preceding the lift, were eliminated with no feedback available, outcomes that were influenced by the object’s size. We argue that vergence cues can improve the reliability of binocular internal representations of object distance for the feedforward programming of hand transport, whereas the major benefits of binocular vision for enhancing grasping performance derive exclusively from its continuous presence online.
Literature
go back to reference Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
go back to reference Anderson J, Bingham GP (2010) A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity τ. Exp Brain Res 205:291–306CrossRefPubMed Anderson J, Bingham GP (2010) A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity τ. Exp Brain Res 205:291–306CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Begliomini C, Wall MB, Smith AT, Castiello U (2007) Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci 25:1245–1252CrossRefPubMed Begliomini C, Wall MB, Smith AT, Castiello U (2007) Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci 25:1245–1252CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bingham GP, Zaal F, Robin D, Shull JA (2000) Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching with and without haptic feedback. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1436–1460CrossRefPubMed Bingham GP, Zaal F, Robin D, Shull JA (2000) Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching with and without haptic feedback. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1436–1460CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R (2001) Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1314–1334CrossRefPubMed Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R (2001) Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:1314–1334CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund H-J (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension. Neurology 50:1253–1259CrossRefPubMed Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund H-J (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension. Neurology 50:1253–1259CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Borchers S, Christensen A, Ziegler L, Himmelbach M (2011) Visual action control does not rely on strangers—effects of pictorial cues under monocular and binocular vision. Neuropsychologica 49:556–563CrossRef Borchers S, Christensen A, Ziegler L, Himmelbach M (2011) Visual action control does not rely on strangers—effects of pictorial cues under monocular and binocular vision. Neuropsychologica 49:556–563CrossRef
go back to reference Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM (2003) The role of binocular information in the ‘on-line’ control of prehension. Spat Vis 16:295–309CrossRefPubMed Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM (2003) The role of binocular information in the ‘on-line’ control of prehension. Spat Vis 16:295–309CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IT, Simpson PJ (2004) Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spat Vis 17:95–110CrossRefPubMed Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IT, Simpson PJ (2004) Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spat Vis 17:95–110CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cavina-Pratesi C, Hesse C (2013) Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping. J Vis 13:1–15CrossRef Cavina-Pratesi C, Hesse C (2013) Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping. J Vis 13:1–15CrossRef
go back to reference Chen Z, Saunders JA (2016) Automatic adjustments towards unseen visual targets during grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 234:2091–2103CrossRefPubMed Chen Z, Saunders JA (2016) Automatic adjustments towards unseen visual targets during grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 234:2091–2103CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89CrossRefPubMed Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180–189CrossRefPubMed Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180–189CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modelling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cognit Sci 4:423–431CrossRef Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modelling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cognit Sci 4:423–431CrossRef
go back to reference Elliot D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2010) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357CrossRef Elliot D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2010) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357CrossRef
go back to reference Elliot D, Lyons J, Hayes SJ, Burkitt JJ, Roberts JW, Grierson LEM, Hansen S, Bennett SJ (2017) The multiple process model of goal-directed reaching revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:95–110CrossRef Elliot D, Lyons J, Hayes SJ, Burkitt JJ, Roberts JW, Grierson LEM, Hansen S, Bennett SJ (2017) The multiple process model of goal-directed reaching revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:95–110CrossRef
go back to reference Fukui T, Inui T (2006) The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. Hum Mov Sci 25:349–371CrossRefPubMed Fukui T, Inui T (2006) The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. Hum Mov Sci 25:349–371CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fukui T, Inui T (2013) Utilization of visual feedback of the hand according to target view availability in the online control of prehension movements. Hum Mov Sci 32:580–595CrossRefPubMed Fukui T, Inui T (2013) Utilization of visual feedback of the hand according to target view availability in the online control of prehension movements. Hum Mov Sci 32:580–595CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H (1994) Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. NeuroReport 5:1525–1529CrossRefPubMed Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H (1994) Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. NeuroReport 5:1525–1529CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallivan JP, Cavina-Pratesi C, Culham JC (2009) Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior pariteo-occiptial cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand. J Neurosci 29:4381–4391CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallivan JP, Cavina-Pratesi C, Culham JC (2009) Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior pariteo-occiptial cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand. J Neurosci 29:4381–4391CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Gaveau V, Pisella L, Priot A-E, Fukui T, Rossetti Y, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (2014) Automatic online control of motor adjustments in reaching and grasping. Neuropsychologica 55:25–40CrossRef Gaveau V, Pisella L, Priot A-E, Fukui T, Rossetti Y, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (2014) Automatic online control of motor adjustments in reaching and grasping. Neuropsychologica 55:25–40CrossRef
go back to reference Glover S, Wall MB, Smith AT (2012) Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans. Eur J Neurosci 35(6):909–915CrossRefPubMed Glover S, Wall MB, Smith AT (2012) Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans. Eur J Neurosci 35(6):909–915CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologica 323:1159–1178CrossRef Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologica 323:1159–1178CrossRef
go back to reference Grant S (2015) Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing. Exp Brain Res 233:3489–3505CrossRefPubMed Grant S (2015) Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing. Exp Brain Res 233:3489–3505CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Greenwald HS, Knill DC (2009) Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth. J Vis 9:1–16CrossRefPubMed Greenwald HS, Knill DC (2009) Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth. J Vis 9:1–16CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Greenwald HS, Knill DC, Saunders JA (2005) Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time. Vision Res 45:1975–1989CrossRefPubMed Greenwald HS, Knill DC, Saunders JA (2005) Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time. Vision Res 45:1975–1989CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784CrossRefPubMed Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hesse C, Franz VH (2010) Grasping remembered object: exponential decay of visual memory. Vision Res 50:2642–2650CrossRefPubMed Hesse C, Franz VH (2010) Grasping remembered object: exponential decay of visual memory. Vision Res 50:2642–2650CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF (2003) Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 148:196–201CrossRefPubMed Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF (2003) Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 148:196–201CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jackson SR, Jones CA, Newport R, Pritchard C (1997) A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis Cogn 4:113–142CrossRef Jackson SR, Jones CA, Newport R, Pritchard C (1997) A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis Cogn 4:113–142CrossRef
go back to reference Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208CrossRefPubMed Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Motor Behav 16:235–254CrossRef Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Motor Behav 16:235–254CrossRef
go back to reference Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71PubMed Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71PubMed
go back to reference Karok S, Newport R (2010) The continuous updating of grasp in response to dynamic changes in object size, hand size and distractor proximity. Neuropsychologica 48:3891–3900CrossRef Karok S, Newport R (2010) The continuous updating of grasp in response to dynamic changes in object size, hand size and distractor proximity. Neuropsychologica 48:3891–3900CrossRef
go back to reference Keefe BD, Watt SJ (2009) The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results. Exp Brain Res 194:435–444CrossRefPubMed Keefe BD, Watt SJ (2009) The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results. Exp Brain Res 194:435–444CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Keefe BD, Watt SJ (2017) Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 235:33643–36331CrossRef Keefe BD, Watt SJ (2017) Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 235:33643–36331CrossRef
go back to reference Keefe BD, Hibbard PB, Watt S (2011) Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism. Neuropsychologica 49:1246–1257CrossRef Keefe BD, Hibbard PB, Watt S (2011) Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: no evidence for a binocular specialism. Neuropsychologica 49:1246–1257CrossRef
go back to reference Knill DC (2005) Reaching for visual cues in depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vis 5:103–115CrossRefPubMed Knill DC (2005) Reaching for visual cues in depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vis 5:103–115CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kopiske KK, Bozzachi C, Volcic R, Domini F (2019) Multiple cues do not prevent systematic biases in reach to grasp movements. Psychol Res 83:147–158CrossRefPubMed Kopiske KK, Bozzachi C, Volcic R, Domini F (2019) Multiple cues do not prevent systematic biases in reach to grasp movements. Psychol Res 83:147–158CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lee Y-L, Crabtree CE, Norman JF, Bingham G (2008) Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online. Percept Psychophys 70:1032–1046CrossRefPubMed Lee Y-L, Crabtree CE, Norman JF, Bingham G (2008) Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online. Percept Psychophys 70:1032–1046CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158:317–327PubMed Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158:317–327PubMed
go back to reference Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (1998) The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 121:465–470CrossRefPubMed Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (1998) The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 121:465–470CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (2001) The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. J Cognit Neurosci 13:8–17CrossRef Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (2001) The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. J Cognit Neurosci 13:8–17CrossRef
go back to reference McIntosh RD, Lashley G (2008) Matching boxes: familiar size influences action programming. Neuropsychologica 46:2441–2444CrossRef McIntosh RD, Lashley G (2008) Matching boxes: familiar size influences action programming. Neuropsychologica 46:2441–2444CrossRef
go back to reference McIntosh RD, Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR (2018) Grasping at laws: speed-accuracy trade-offs in manual prehension. J Exp Pyschol Hum Percept Perform 44:1022–1037CrossRef McIntosh RD, Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR (2018) Grasping at laws: speed-accuracy trade-offs in manual prehension. J Exp Pyschol Hum Percept Perform 44:1022–1037CrossRef
go back to reference Melmoth DR, Grant S (2006) Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 171:371–388CrossRefPubMed Melmoth DR, Grant S (2006) Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 171:371–388CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Melmoth DR, Grant S (2012) Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 222:265–276CrossRefPubMed Melmoth DR, Grant S (2012) Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 222:265–276CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S (2007) Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 183:283–298CrossRefPubMed Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S (2007) Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 183:283–298CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Morgan MJ, Grant S (2009) Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:3711–3720CrossRefPubMed Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Morgan MJ, Grant S (2009) Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:3711–3720CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman HC (1999) The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res 128:578–582CrossRefPubMed Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman HC (1999) The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res 128:578–582CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD (2000) A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:268–273CrossRefPubMed Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD (2000) A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:268–273CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mon-Williams M, Murray AH (2000) The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 135:405–410CrossRefPubMed Mon-Williams M, Murray AH (2000) The size of the visual size cue used for programming manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 135:405–410CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 83:2580–2601CrossRefPubMed Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 83:2580–2601CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Kennedy SA, Colpa L, Chandrakumar M, Goltz HC, Wong AMF (2012) Effects of induced monocular image blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching and eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4354–4362CrossRefPubMed Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Kennedy SA, Colpa L, Chandrakumar M, Goltz HC, Wong AMF (2012) Effects of induced monocular image blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching and eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4354–4362CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica 9:97–112CrossRef Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica 9:97–112CrossRef
go back to reference Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234CrossRefPubMed Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729–736CrossRefPubMed Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729–736CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Quinlan DJ, Culham JC (2007) fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex. Neuroimage 36(1):167–187CrossRefPubMed Quinlan DJ, Culham JC (2007) fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex. Neuroimage 36(1):167–187CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rizzolatti G, Matelli M (2003) Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 153:167–187CrossRef Rizzolatti G, Matelli M (2003) Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 153:167–187CrossRef
go back to reference Rogers B, Bradshaw MF (1993) Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 361:253–255CrossRefPubMed Rogers B, Bradshaw MF (1993) Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 361:253–255CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98:119–127CrossRefPubMed Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98:119–127CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vis Res 32:1513–1521CrossRefPubMed Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vis Res 32:1513–1521CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tittle JS, Todd JT, Perotti VJ, Norman JF (1995) Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:663–678CrossRefPubMed Tittle JS, Todd JT, Perotti VJ, Norman JF (1995) Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:663–678CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Todd JT, Norman JF (2003) The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Percept Psychophys 65:31–47CrossRefPubMed Todd JT, Norman JF (2003) The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Percept Psychophys 65:31–47CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Toni E, Rice NJ, Hamilton A, Grafton ST (2007) Beyond grasping: Representation of action in the human anterior intraparietal sulcus. NeuroImage 36(Suppl 2):77–86 Toni E, Rice NJ, Hamilton A, Grafton ST (2007) Beyond grasping: Representation of action in the human anterior intraparietal sulcus. NeuroImage 36(Suppl 2):77–86
go back to reference Tresillian JR, Mon-Williams M, Kelly BM (1999) Increasing confidence in vergence as a distance cue. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:39–44CrossRef Tresillian JR, Mon-Williams M, Kelly BM (1999) Increasing confidence in vergence as a distance cue. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:39–44CrossRef
go back to reference Verheij R, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2014) The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 232(11):3569–3578CrossRefPubMed Verheij R, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2014) The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 232(11):3569–3578CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vesia M, Prime SL, Yan X, Sergio LE, Crawford JD (2010) Specificity of human parietal saccade and reach regions during transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 30:13053–13065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vesia M, Prime SL, Yan X, Sergio LE, Crawford JD (2010) Specificity of human parietal saccade and reach regions during transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 30:13053–13065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Volcic R, Fantoni C, Caudek C, Assad JA, Domini F (2013) Visuomotor adaptation changes stereoscopic depth perception and tactile discrimination. J Neurosci 33:17081–17088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Volcic R, Fantoni C, Caudek C, Assad JA, Domini F (2013) Visuomotor adaptation changes stereoscopic depth perception and tactile discrimination. J Neurosci 33:17081–17088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Voudouris D, Smeets JBJ, Fiehler K, Brenner E (2018) Gaze when reaching to grasp a glass. J Vis 18:1–12CrossRef Voudouris D, Smeets JBJ, Fiehler K, Brenner E (2018) Gaze when reaching to grasp a glass. J Vis 18:1–12CrossRef
go back to reference Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologica 38:1473–1481CrossRef Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologica 38:1473–1481CrossRef
go back to reference Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 29:404–415CrossRef Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 29:404–415CrossRef
go back to reference Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL, Frazer MB (1991) The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Motor Behav 23:192–204CrossRef Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL, Frazer MB (1991) The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Motor Behav 23:192–204CrossRef
go back to reference Westwood DA, Robertson C, Heath M (2005) Action control: independent effects of memory and monocular viewing on reaching accuracy. Brain Cognit 57:257–260CrossRef Westwood DA, Robertson C, Heath M (2005) Action control: independent effects of memory and monocular viewing on reaching accuracy. Brain Cognit 57:257–260CrossRef
go back to reference Whitwell RL, Lambert LM, Goodale MA (2008) Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension. Exp Brain Res 188:603–611CrossRefPubMed Whitwell RL, Lambert LM, Goodale MA (2008) Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension. Exp Brain Res 188:603–611CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260CrossRefPubMed Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882CrossRefPubMed Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR (2011) Priniciples of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:739–751CrossRefPubMed Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR (2011) Priniciples of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:739–751CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Yang Q, Bucci MP, Kapoula Z (2002) The latency of saccades, vergence, and combined eye movements in children and adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2939–2949PubMed Yang Q, Bucci MP, Kapoula Z (2002) The latency of saccades, vergence, and combined eye movements in children and adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2939–2949PubMed
go back to reference Zhao H, Warren WH (2015) On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action. Vis Res 110:190–202CrossRefPubMed Zhao H, Warren WH (2015) On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action. Vis Res 110:190–202CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension
Authors
Simon Grant
Miriam L. Conway
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05503-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Experimental Brain Research 5/2019 Go to the issue