Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Obesity Surgery
Published in: Obesity Surgery 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Contributions

Solid Versus Liquid—Satiety Study in Well-Adjusted Lap-Band Patients

Authors: Laura V. Jones, Kay M. Jones, Chris Hensman, Ruth Bertuch, Toni L. McGee, John B. Dixon

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are generally advised to avoid liquid calories, opt for solids and refrain from drinking with meals as this is believed to prolong satiety. The role of food consistency and satiety following LAGB is largely uninvestigated. The purpose of the study was to: (1) determine if food consistency impacts on post meal satiety in participants with well-adjusted LAGB and (2) compare the level of satiety achieved after consuming a solid versus a liquid meal between groups.

Methods

Twenty intervention (well-adjusted LAGB) and 20 control participants were recruited. All participants consumed three iso-caloric breakfasts that were randomised for nine mornings. Participants were asked to rate their satiety on visual analogue scales (VAS) at set times after the test meal. Areas under the curve (AUC) VAS scores were compared within and between groups.

Results

Solids (bars) with or without water provided greater satiety than the liquids (shakes) for both groups. Drinking water with the bar did influence satiety in the intervention group. For the intervention group (LAGB), AUC VAS values for the bar with water were 77.4 ± 11.2* and 72.4 ± 16.7* for the controls.

Conclusion

Solid meals are more satisfying in both LAGB and non-LAGB individuals. However, a solid meal with accompanying water did not alter meal satiety.
Literature
1.
2.
Walls HL et al. Projected progression of the prevalence of obesity in Australia. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(4):872–8.CrossRef
3.
Dixon JB et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and other devices for the management of obesity. Circulation. 2012;126(6):774–85.PubMedCrossRef
4.
WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:1–253.
5.
Mathes WF, Kelly SA, Pomp D. Advances in comparative genetics: influence of genetics on obesity. Br J Nutr. 2011;106 Suppl 1:S1–S10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Sjostrom L et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307(1):56–65.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Picot J et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190. pp. 215–357, iii–iv.
8.
Sjostrom L et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Colquitt JL et al. Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD003641.PubMed
10.
O'Brien PE et al. Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(9):625–33.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Dixon B et al. Surgical approaches to the treatment of obesity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:429–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Biagini J, Karam L. Ten years experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):573–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Burton PR, Brown WA. The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35 Suppl 3:S26–30.CrossRef
14.
Burton PR et al. Changes in satiety, supra- and infraband transit, and gastric emptying following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective follow-up study. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):217–23.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kampe J et al. Neural and humoral changes associated with the adjustable gastric band: insights from a rodent model. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36:1403–11.CrossRef
16.
Pedersen JB et al. Weight loss after gastric banding is associated with pouch pressure and not pouch emptying rate. Obes Surv. 2009;19(7):850–5.CrossRef
17.
Tikinsky RE et al. Gastric emptying of semisolids and pouch motility following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2009;19(9):1270–3.CrossRef
18.
O'Brien PE. The Lap-Band solution. 1st ed. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing; 2007. p. 248.
19.
20.
Pan A, Hu FB. Effects of carbohydrates on satiety: differences between liquid and solid food. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14(4):385–90.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Paddon-Jones D et al. Protein, weight management, and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1558S–61S.PubMed
22.
Potier M, Darcel N, Tome D. Protein, amino acids and the control of food intake. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12(1):54–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Di Meglio D, Matts RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrates: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes. 2000;24:794–800.CrossRef
24.
Mattes R. Fluid calories and energy balance: the good, the bad, and the uncertain. Physiol Behav. 2006;89(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Almiron-Roig E, Chen Y, Drewnowski A. No difference in satiety or in subsequent energy intakes between a beverage and a solid food. Physiol Behav. 2004;82:671–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
van Dam RM, Seidell JC. Carbohydrate intake and obesity. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61 Suppl 1:S75–99.PubMed
27.
Tieken SM et al. Effects of solid versus liquid meal-replacement products of similar energy content on hunger, satiety, and appetite-regulating hormones in older adults. Horm Metab Res. 2007;39(5):389–94.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
30.
31.
Colles SL, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Hunger control and regular physical activity facilitate weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2008;18(7):833–40.PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
Dixon AF, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding induces prolonged satiety: a randomized blind crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):813–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Jessen A et al. The appetite-suppressant effect of nicotine is enhanced by caffeine. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005;7(4):327–33.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Lane JD, Feinglos MN, Surwit RS. Caffeine increases ambulatory glucose and postprandial responses in coffee drinkers with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):221–2.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Haber GB et al. Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre. Effects on satiety, plasma-glucose, and serum-insulin. Lancet. 1977;2(8040):679–82.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Sumithran P et al. Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(17):1597–604.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Dixon AF et al. Pancreatic polypeptide meal response may predict gastric band-induced weight loss. Obes Surg. 2011;21(12):1906–13.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Lappalainen R et al. Drinking water with a meal: a simple method of coping with feelings of hunger, satiety and desire to eat. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47(11):815–9.PubMed
40.
Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Thorwart ML. Water incorporated into a food but not served with a food decreases energy intake in lean women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(4):448–55.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Solid Versus Liquid—Satiety Study in Well-Adjusted Lap-Band Patients
Authors
Laura V. Jones
Kay M. Jones
Chris Hensman
Ruth Bertuch
Toni L. McGee
John B. Dixon
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0897-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Obesity Surgery 8/2013 Go to the issue

Original Contributions

Effects of Gastrogastric Fistula Repair on Weight Loss and Gut Hormone Levels

Letter to the Editor

Response to Hajnal et al.

Original Contributions

Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: the Same Impact on IL-6 and TNF-α. Prospective Clinical Trial

Original Contributions

The Intra-gastric Balloon for Pre-operative Weight Loss in Bariatric Surgery: Is it Worthwhile?

Clinical Research

Impact of Different Protocols of Nutritional Supplements on the Status of Vitamin A in Class III Obese Patients after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Original Contributions

Linear-Stapled Gastrojejunostomy with Transverse Hand-Sewn Enterotomy Closure Significantly Reduces Strictures for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass