Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Review

Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment

Authors: Marie S. Dreyer, Ann B. Nattinger, Emily L. McGinley, Liliana E. Pezzin

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Evidence suggests substantial disparities in breast cancer survival by socioeconomic status (SES). We examine the extent to which receipt of newer, less invasive, or more effective treatments—a plausible source of disparities in survival—varies by SES among elderly women with early-stage breast cancer.

Methods

Multivariate regression analyses applied to 11,368 women (age 66–90 years) identified from SEER-Medicare as having invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 2006–2009. Socioeconomic status was defined based on Medicaid enrollment and level of poverty of the census tract of residence. All analyses controlled for demographic, clinical health status, spatial, and healthcare system characteristics.

Results

Poor and near-poor women were less likely than high SES women to receive sentinel lymph node biopsy and radiation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Poor women were also less likely than near-poor or high SES women to receive any axillary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in use of aromatase inhibitors (AI) between poor and high SES women. However, near-poor women who initiated hormonal therapy were more likely to rely exclusively on tamoxifen, and less likely to use the more expensive but more effective AI when compared to both poor and high SES women.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that SES disparities in the receipt of treatments for incident breast cancer are both pervasive and substantial. These disparities remained despite women’s geographic area of residence and extent of disease, suggesting important gaps in access to effective breast cancer care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975–1999 Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975–1999
2.
go back to reference Gordon NH, Crowe JP, Brumberg DJ, Berger NA (1992) Socioeconomic factors and race in breast cancer recurrence and survival. Am J Epidemiol 135(6):609–618CrossRefPubMed Gordon NH, Crowe JP, Brumberg DJ, Berger NA (1992) Socioeconomic factors and race in breast cancer recurrence and survival. Am J Epidemiol 135(6):609–618CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman MC (2009) Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987–2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(1):121–131. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0679 CrossRef Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman MC (2009) Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987–2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(1):121–131. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-08-0679 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Byers T, Wolf H, Bauer K et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 113(3):582–591. doi:10.1002/cncr.23567 CrossRefPubMed Byers T, Wolf H, Bauer K et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 113(3):582–591. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​23567 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Singh GK, Williams S, Siahpush M (2012) Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: Part I—All cancers and lung cancer and Part II—Colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical Singh GK, Williams S, Siahpush M (2012) Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: Part I—All cancers and lung cancer and Part II—Colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical
13.
17.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau (2014) American Community Survey 2005–2009 U.S. Census Bureau (2014) American Community Survey 2005–2009
18.
go back to reference Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004. J Clin Oncol 23(3):619–629. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.121 CrossRefPubMed Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004. J Clin Oncol 23(3):619–629. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​09.​121 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM (2007) A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol 17(8):584–590CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM (2007) A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol 17(8):584–590CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
23.
go back to reference Wang X, Du X (2015) Socio-demographic and geographic variations in the utilization of hormone therapy in older women with breast cancer after Medicare Part-D coverage. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 32(5):154. doi:10.1007/s12032-015-0599-6 CrossRef Wang X, Du X (2015) Socio-demographic and geographic variations in the utilization of hormone therapy in older women with breast cancer after Medicare Part-D coverage. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 32(5):154. doi:10.​1007/​s12032-015-0599-6 CrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Gomez S, Press D, Lichtensztajn D et al (2012) Patient, hospital, and neighborhood factors associated with treatment of early-stage breast cancer among Asian American women in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(5):821–834. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1143 CrossRef Gomez S, Press D, Lichtensztajn D et al (2012) Patient, hospital, and neighborhood factors associated with treatment of early-stage breast cancer among Asian American women in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(5):821–834. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-11-1143 CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Olaya W, Wong J, Morgan J, Roy-Chowdhury S, Lum S (2009) Disparities in the surgical management of women with stage I breast cancer. Am Surg 75(10):869–872PubMed Olaya W, Wong J, Morgan J, Roy-Chowdhury S, Lum S (2009) Disparities in the surgical management of women with stage I breast cancer. Am Surg 75(10):869–872PubMed
30.
33.
go back to reference Montgomery M, Pope GC, Greenwald L, Kautter J (2010) Medicare advantage plan availability, premiums and benefits, and beneficiary enrollment in 2007. Montgomery M, Pope GC, Greenwald L, Kautter J (2010) Medicare advantage plan availability, premiums and benefits, and beneficiary enrollment in 2007.
35.
go back to reference Partridge Ann H et al (2016) Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 34(27):3308–3314CrossRefPubMed Partridge Ann H et al (2016) Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. J Clin Oncol 34(27):3308–3314CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
go back to reference Chen A, Halpern M, Schrag N, Stewart A, Leitch M, Ward E (2008) Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998–2005). J Natl Cancer Inst 100(7):462–474. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn057 CrossRefPubMed Chen A, Halpern M, Schrag N, Stewart A, Leitch M, Ward E (2008) Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998–2005). J Natl Cancer Inst 100(7):462–474. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djn057 CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Neuner JM., et al. (2015) The introduction of generic aromatase inhibitors and treatment adherence among Medicare D enrollees. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(8): djv130.39 Neuner JM., et al. (2015) The introduction of generic aromatase inhibitors and treatment adherence among Medicare D enrollees. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(8): djv130.39
40.
go back to reference Riley, Gerald F., et al. (2011) Endocrine therapy use among elderly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients enrolled in Medicare Part D. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 1(4) Riley, Gerald F., et al. (2011) Endocrine therapy use among elderly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients enrolled in Medicare Part D. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 1(4)
Metadata
Title
Socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment
Authors
Marie S. Dreyer
Ann B. Nattinger
Emily L. McGinley
Liliana E. Pezzin
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4490-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine