Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Obesity Surgery
Published in: Obesity Surgery 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Original Contributions

Role of Robotic Surgery in Complex Revisional Bariatric Procedures

Authors: Yilon Lima Cheng, Enrique F. Elli

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is becoming more common, with an estimated increase of more than 300% from 2017 to 2018. For these complex procedures, the role of robotics is still debated. The purpose of our study is to report the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted RBSs.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for robotic-assisted RBSs performed at the Mayo Clinic in Florida, between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020. Peri- and postoperative data were analyzed, reviewing patient characteristics, indications for surgery, and outcomes.

Results

From 160 RBSs performed during the study period, 67 were robotic-assisted and met inclusion criteria. Primary procedures included sleeve gastrectomy (26 [38.8%]), adjustable gastric band (24 [35.8%]), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (14 [20.9%]), vertical-banded gastroplasty (2 [3.0%]), and duodenal switch (1 [1.5%]). RBSs performed were Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (49 [73.1%]), redo gastrojejunostomy (14 [20.9%]), and duodenal switch (4 [6.0%]). Rate of conversion to open procedure and rate of readmission 1 month after surgery were 6.0% and 7.5%, respectively. Rate of 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher adverse events was 4.5%. No anastomotic leaks were documented. Fifty-two patients presented with preoperative symptoms, and 69.2% reported improvement after RBS. Mean (SD) excess weight loss was 57.62% (23.80) 12 months after RBS.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted RBSs are safe with low major adverse event rates. Symptom resolution and weight loss outcomes are acceptable.
Literature
1.
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):457–63.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, et al. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Aleassa EM, Hassan M, Hayes K, et al. Effect of revisional bariatric surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2642–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Vallois A, Menahem B, Le Roux Y, et al. Revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a safe surgical opportunity? Results of a case-matched study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):903–10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, et al. Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2180–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Rogula T, Koprivanac M, Janik MR, et al. Does robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass provide outcome advantages over standard laparoscopic approaches? Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2589–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Villamere J, Gebhart A, Vu S, et al. Utilization and outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic general and bariatric surgical procedures at Academic Medical Centers. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(7):1729–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1573–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1852–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Bindal V, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Elli EF. Outcomes of robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a reoperative bariatric procedure. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1810–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Diaz-Vico T, Elli EF. Value of robotic-assisted technique in redo gastrojejunostomy for severe stenosis after gastric bypass. J Robot Surg. 2019.
13.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Al-Kurd A, Grinbaum R, Abubeih A, et al. Conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to gastric bypass: a comparison to primary gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(6):1519–25.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Yao DA, et al. Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality? Am J Surg. 2009;197(3):391–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Mohos E, Jano Z, Richter D, et al. Quality of life, weight loss and improvement of co-morbidities after primary and revisional laparoscopic roux Y gastric bypass procedure-comparative match pair study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2048–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Mor A, Keenan E, Portenier D, et al. Case-matched analysis comparing outcomes of revisional versus primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):548–52.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Revisional vs. primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--a case-matched analysis: less weight loss in revisions. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1627–32.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Altieri MS, Yang J, Telem DA, et al. Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):1725–32.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Coblijn UK, Verveld CJ, van Wagensveld BA, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band--a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1899–914.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos AA, et al. Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1365–73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gonzalez-Heredia R, Masrur M, Patton K, et al. Revisions after failed gastric band: sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2533–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Nguyen D, Dip F, Huaco JA, et al. Outcomes of revisional treatment modalities in non-complicated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients with weight regain. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):928–34.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Benois M, Sebastianelli L, Morisot A, et al. Revisional but not conversional gastric bypass surgery increases the risk of leaks: review of 176 redo out of 932 consecutive cases. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2903–11.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Baumann AJ, Mramba LK, Hawkins RB, et al. Endoscopic dilation of bariatric RNY anastomotic strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):4053–63.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Fayad L, Simsek C, Oleas R, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopically secured fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMS) for post-bariatric complex stenosis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3484–92.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Corcelles R, Jamal MH, Daigle CR, et al. Surgical management of gastrogastric fistula. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(6):1227–32.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zaveri H, Dallal RM, Cottam D, et al. Indications and operative outcomes of gastric bypass reversal. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2285–90.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Pucher PH, Lord AC, Sodergren MH, et al. Reversal to normal anatomy after failed gastric bypass: systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(7):1351–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Clapp B, Liggett E, Jones R, et al. Comparison of robotic revisional weight loss surgery and laparoscopic revisional weight loss surgery using the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(6):909–19.PubMedCrossRef
31.
El Chaar M, King K, Pastrana M, et al. Outcomes of robotic surgery in revisional bariatric cases: a propensity score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP registry. J Robot Surg. 2020.
32.
Nasser H, Munie S, Kindel TL, et al. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(3):397–405.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Noyes K, Myneni AA, Schwaitzberg SD, et al. Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan? Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):973–80.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Rebecchi F, Ugliono E, Allaix ME, et al. Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional bariatric procedure: a single-center prospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2019;
35.
36.
Moon RC, Segura AR, Teixeira AF, et al. Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted bariatric conversions and revisions. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1080–5.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Hornock S, Ellis O, Dilday J, et al. The safety of additional procedures at the time of revisional bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020.
38.
Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kostakis ID, Sran H, Uwechue R, et al. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic or open anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Robot Surg. 2019;6:27–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
King K, Galvez A, Stoltzfus J, et al. Cost analysis of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a single academic center: how expensive is expensive? Obes Surg. 2020.
41.
Fazl Alizadeh R, Li S, Inaba CS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):917–22.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Lundberg PW, Stoltzfus J, El Chaar M. 30-day outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: first analysis based on MBSAQIP. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Aman MW, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, et al. Early hospital readmission after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2231–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Galal AM, Boerma EJ, Fransen S, et al. Fast track program in conversion bariatric surgery, as safe as in primary bariatric surgery? Obes Surg. 2019;30(4):1291–302.CrossRef
45.
Abdelgawad M, De Angelis F, Iossa A, et al. Management of complications and outcomes after revisional bariatric surgery: 3-year experience at a bariatric center of excellence. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2144–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai CC, et al. Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):612–20.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Role of Robotic Surgery in Complex Revisional Bariatric Procedures
Authors
Yilon Lima Cheng
Enrique F. Elli
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05272-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Obesity Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Dignity and Respect: People-First Language with Regard to Obesity

Original Contributions

Changes in Anthropometric Measures, Nutritional Indices and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Compared with Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)

Original Contributions

Effects of Post-operative Nutritional Disorders Following Bariatric Surgery on Health Care Cost and Use

Original Contributions

Executive Functioning in Extreme Obesity: Contributions from Metabolic Status, Medical Comorbidities, and Psychiatric Factors

Correction

Correction to: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, Nutritional Outcomes, Endoscopic Results, and Quality of Life at 8-Year Follow-Up

Original Contributions

Impact of Baseline BMI and Adherence to Follow-Up on the Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Treatment of Adolescent Obesity