Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use

Authors: Joshua Nitsche, Connor Howell, Thomas Howell

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples at the time of cesarean section is associated with decreased in-hospital analgesic use compared to skin closure with surgical steel staples.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2008 comparing in-hospital analgesic use after cesarean section between patients ,who underwent skin closure with surgical steel staples and subcuticular absorbable polyglycolic acid staples.

Results

Eighty-nine subjects were included in the absorbable staple cohort and 95 were included in the steel staple group. There was a 1.5-fold decrease in ketorolac use (p < 0.0001) and a trend toward decreased ibuprofen use in the absorbable staple cohort (p = 0.06). There was no difference in hydrocodone/acetaminophen use between groups (p = 0.89).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the use of subcuticular absorbable staples for skin closure at the time of cesarean section may lead to less in-hospital analgesic use, and thereby positively impact a patient’s post-operative course. In addition, while reduced analgesic use may represent a small cost savings for each individual patient, there is the potential for significant savings when one considers the large number of cesarean sections performed in the US annually. Prospective studies will be required to assess the full impact of the use of this new skin closure technology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S (2010) Births: preliminary data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 58 (16) Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S (2010) Births: preliminary data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 58 (16)
2.
go back to reference Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J (2009) Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 31(6):514–520PubMed Altman AD, Allen VM, McNeil SA, Dempster J (2009) Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 31(6):514–520PubMed
3.
go back to reference Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP (2005) Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(5):1607–1617PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Walsh CA (2010) Evidence-based cesarean technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22 (2):110–115 Walsh CA (2010) Evidence-based cesarean technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22 (2):110–115
5.
go back to reference Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW (1997) Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples versus subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 42(10):627–630PubMed Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW (1997) Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples versus subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 42(10):627–630PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E (2008) Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E (2008) Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138(1):29–33PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N (2009) A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 (3):265 e261–e264 Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N (2009) A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 (3):265 e261–e264
8.
go back to reference Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 64(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 64(1):30–35PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N (2005) Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 66(11):1975–1984PubMedCrossRef Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N (2005) Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 66(11):1975–1984PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT (2006) A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16(1):19–27PubMed Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT (2006) A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16(1):19–27PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS (1985) Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67(5):318–320PubMed Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS (1985) Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67(5):318–320PubMed
12.
go back to reference Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, Walsh T, Carrazo M, Nicklin J (2007) Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. ANZ J Surg 77(6):460–463PubMedCrossRef Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, Walsh T, Carrazo M, Nicklin J (2007) Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery. ANZ J Surg 77(6):460–463PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use
Authors
Joshua Nitsche
Connor Howell
Thomas Howell
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2012 Go to the issue