Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Dermatology Reports
Published in: Current Dermatology Reports 4/2023

10-10-2023 | Skin Cancer | REVIEW

The Role of Dermoscopy in Provider-to-Provider Store-and-Forward Dermatology eConsults: A Scoping Review of the Recent Literature

Authors: Zhuoqing S. Gellatly, Imene B. Lagha, Niels Kvorning Ternov, Elizabeth Berry, Kelly C. Nelson, Elizabeth V. Seiverling

Published in: Current Dermatology Reports | Issue 4/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This scoping review maps recent literature on dermatology provider-to-provider asynchronous store-and-forward (SAF) electronic consult (eConsult) platforms with dermoscopy. It offers a descriptive overview, highlighting benefits and challenges.

Recent Findings

Incorporating dermoscopy into SAF eConsults improves diagnostic accuracy for benign and malignant skin neoplasms. Diagnostic and treatment concordance with traditional face-to-face (FTF) visits is high. SAF eConsults with dermoscopy enhance access to dermatological care by improving triage and reducing wait times for FTF visits. Pediatric patients benefit with improved evaluation of melanocytic and vascular growths. eConsult platforms with dermoscopy serve as a telementoring opportunity for clinicians interested in improving their dermoscopy skills.

Summary

Adding dermoscopy to SAF eConsults is valuable and results in improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced need for FTF visits. Implementation barriers can be overcome through collaboration between primary care and dermatology. Dermoscopy in SAF eConsults has significant potential for managing skin conditions and reducing the burden caused by unnecessary FTF visits and biopsies.
Literature
1.
Landow SM, Mateus A, Korgavkar K, Nightingale D, Weinstock MA. Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:570–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Bleicher B, Levine A, Markowitz O. Going digital with dermoscopy. Cutis. 2018;102:102–5.PubMed
3.
Bruce AF, Mallow JA, Theeke LA. The use of teledermoscopy in the accurate identification of cancerous skin lesions in the adult population: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:75–83.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5:371–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Singh J, Keely E, Guglani S, Garber G, Liddy C. The utilization of an electronic consultation service during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28:994–1000.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, Orlander J, Berlowitz D, Fincke BG, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:323–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Liddy C, Drosinis P, Keely E. Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care-a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2016;33:274–85.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lee MS, Nambudiri VE. Electronic consultations (eConsults) for safe and equitable coordination of virtual outpatient specialty care. Appl Clin Inform. 2020;11:821–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Osman MA, Schick-Makaroff K, Thompson S, Bialy L, Featherstone R, Kurzawa J, et al. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001629.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Seiger K, Hawryluk EB, Kroshinsky D, Kvedar JC, Das S. Pediatric dermatology eConsults: reduced wait times and dermatology office visits. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:804–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Pahalyants V, Murphy WS, Gunasekera NS, Das S, Hawryluk EB, Kroshinsky D. Evaluation of electronic consults for outpatient pediatric patients with dermatologic complaints. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38:1210–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zakaria A, Miclau TA, Maurer T, Leslie KS, Amerson E. Cost minimization analysis of a teledermatology triage system in a managed care setting. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:52–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zakaria A, Maurer T, Su G, Amerson E. Impact of teledermatology on the accessibility and efficiency of dermatology care in an urban safety-net hospital: a pre-post analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:1446–52.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Chuchu N, Takwoingi Y, Dinnes J, Matin RN, Bassett O, Moreau JF, et al. Smartphone applications for triaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD013192.PubMed
16.
Chuchu N, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Matin RN, Bayliss SE, Davenport C, et al. Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD013193.PubMed
17.
Naka F, Lu J, Porto A, Villagra J, Wu ZH, Anderson D. Impact of dermatology eConsults on access to care and skin cancer screening in underserved populations: a model for teledermatology services in community health centers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:293–302.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Massone C, Brunasso AMG, Campbell TM, Soyer HP. Mobile teledermoscopy–melanoma diagnosis by one click? Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2009;28:203–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Ruiz-de-Casas A, Nieto-Garcia A, Moreno-Alvarez P, Galdeano R, et al. Economic evaluation of a store-and-forward teledermatology system for skin cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:40–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wang RF, Trinidad J, Lawrence J, Pootrakul L, Forrest LA, Goist K, et al. Improved patient access and outcomes with the integration of an eConsult program (teledermatology) within a large academic medical center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1633–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Kwok J, Olayiwola JN, Knox M, Murphy EJ, Tuot DS. Electronic consultation system demonstrates educational benefit for primary care providers. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:465–72.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Sonthalia S, Yumeen S, Kaliyadan F. Dermoscopy overview and extradiagnostic applications. StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
23.
Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:159–65.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Wang SQ, Dusza SW, Scope A, Braun RP, Kopf AW, Marghoob AA. Differences in dermoscopic images from nonpolarized dermoscope and polarized dermoscope influence the diagnostic accuracy and confidence level: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:1389–95.PubMed
25.
Marghoob AA, Usatine RP, Jaimes N. Dermoscopy for the family physician. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88:441–50.PubMed
26.
Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR, et al. Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD011902.PubMed
27.
Reiter O, Mimouni I, Gdalevich M, Marghoob AA, Levi A, Hodak E, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:1380–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Jones OT, Jurascheck LC, van Melle MA, Hickman S, Burrows NP, Hall PN, et al. Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027529.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Fried L, Tan A, Bajaj S, Liebman TN, Polsky D, Stein JA. Technological advances for the detection of melanoma: advances in diagnostic techniques. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:983–92.PubMedCrossRef
30.
MacLellan AN, Price EL, Publicover-Brouwer P, Matheson K, Ly TY, Pasternak S, et al. The use of noninvasive imaging techniques in the diagnosis of melanoma: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:353–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Errichetti E. Dermoscopy in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): pitfalls and tips. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:653–60.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Alessandrini A, Bruni F, Piraccini BM, Starace M. Common causes of hair loss - clinical manifestations, trichoscopy and therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:629–40.PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
35.
•• Deda LC, Goldberg RH, Jamerson TA, Lee I, Tejasvi T. Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:55. This is the first formal guideline for use of dermoscopy in telemedicine. This guideline provides standardization on dermatoscope devices, image orientation, resolution, scale, measurement, focus, depth of field, color, and field of view.
36.
Ferrándiz L, Ojeda-Vila T, Corrales A, Martín-Gutiérrez FJ, Ruíz-de-Casas A, Galdeano R, et al. Internet-based skin cancer screening using clinical images alone or in conjunction with dermoscopic images: a randomized teledermoscopy trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:676–82.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Paoli J, Bjellerup M, Bucharbajeva Z, Gonzalez H, Nielsen K, et al. Diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance with teledermoscopy referrals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:898–903.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Kravets K, Vasylenko O, Dranyk Z, Bogomolets O. Store-and-forward teledermatology for the most common skin neoplasms in Ukraine. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2018;27:79–83.PubMed
39.
Barcaui CB, Lima PMO. Application of teledermoscopy in the diagnosis of pigmented lesions. Int J Telemed Appl. 2018;2018:1624073.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Bandic J, Kovacevic S, Karabeg R, Lazarov A, Opric D. Teledermoscopy for skin cancer prevention: a comparative study of clinical and teledermoscopic diagnosis. Acta Inform Med. 2020;28:37–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Marchetti A, Dalle S, Maucort-Boulch D, Amini-Adl M, Debarbieux S, Poulalhon N, et al. Diagnostic concordance in tertiary (dermatologists-to-experts) teledermoscopy: a final diagnosis-based study on 290 cases. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10:e2020071.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Tugrul B, Yalici-Armagan B, Demirdag HG, Gunduz O. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic approach of dermatologists and plastic surgeons to non-melanocytic skin lesions by using telemedicine. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12:e2022124.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Sola-Ortigosa J, Muñoz-Santos C, Masat-Ticó T, Isidro-Ortega J, Guilabert A, Grup d’Estudi de Teledermatologia del Vallès Oriental. The role of teledermatology and teledermoscopy in the diagnosis of actinic keratosis and field cancerization. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:1976–1984.e4.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Vestergaard T, Prasad SC, Schuster A, Laurinaviciene R, Andersen MK, Bygum A. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver concordance: teledermoscopy of 600 suspicious skin lesions in Southern Denmark. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1601–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Rat C, Hild S, Rault Sérandour J, Gaultier A, Quereux G, Dreno B, et al. Use of smartphones for early detection of melanoma: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
• Uppal SK, Beer J, Hadeler E, Gitlow H, Nouri K. The clinical utility of teledermoscopy in the era of telemedicine. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34:e14766. This is a review article discussing the application of teledermoscopy in clinical practice (store-and-forward and direct-to-consumer teledermoscopy) including advantages and limitations.
47.
Greenwald E, Tan A, Stein JA, Liebman TN, Bowling A, Polsky D. Real-world outcomes of melanoma surveillance using the MoleMap NZ telemedicine platform. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:596–603.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Tan A, Greenwald E, Bajaj S, Belen D, Sheridan T, Stein JA, et al. Melanoma surveillance for high-risk patients via telemedicine: examination of real-world data from an integrated store-and-forward total body photography and dermoscopy service. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:191–2.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Lupu M, Caruntu C, Popa MI, Voiculescu VM, Zurac S, Boda D. Vascular patterns in basal cell carcinoma: dermoscopic, confocal and histopathological perspectives. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:4112–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Seiverling E, Bishop J, Alfiero R, Houk L, Moss K, Ahrns H, Cyr P. Rapid expansion of an ambulatory dermatology eConsult platform with dermoscopy: a potential model for other health systems. American Telehealth Association Annual Conference and Expo. Boston, MA. Oral presentation; 2022.
51.
Glazer AM, Farberg AS, Winkelmann RR, Rigel DS. Analysis of trends in geographic distribution and density of US dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:322–5.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Lee C, Witkowski A, Żychowska M, Ludzik J. The role of mobile teledermoscopy in skin cancer triage and management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022;1–6.
53.
Woodley A. Can teledermatology meet the needs of the remote and rural population? Br J Nurs. 2021;30:574–9.PubMedCrossRef
54.
• van Sinderen F, Tensen E, Lansink R, Jaspers M, Peute L. Eleven years of teledermoscopy in the Netherlands: a retrospective quality and performance analysis of 18,738 consultations. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;1357633X221122113. A retrospective study on the quality and performance of Dutch primary care teledermoscopy consultation data for the past 11 years, revealing information on diagnostic confidence, efficiency, and economic impact on such store-and-forward teledermoscopy consultation platforms.
55.
• Rogers T, McCrary MR, Yeung H, Krueger L, Chen SC. Dermoscopic photographs impact confidence and management of remotely triaged skin lesions. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12:e2022129. A preliminary study with a parallel convergent mixed method design that showed significant improvement of recognition of malignancies and reduced triage urgency for non-malignant lesions with addition of dermoscopy.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
57.
Errichetti E, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, Apalla Z, Argenziano G, Bakos R, et al. Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:454–67.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Sharma P, Nguyen BM, Yang F-SC. A patient-centric cost analysis of store-and-forward teledermatology. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:e43–5.CrossRef
59.
Snoswell CL, Caffery LJ. Current economic evidence for teledermoscopy. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2020;9:131–5.CrossRef
60.
Vestergaard T, Andersen MK, Kidholm K. A cost-minimization analysis comparing teledermoscopy and face-to-face evaluations of suspicious skin lesions in Southern Denmark. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;1357633X221077864.
61.
Snoswell CL, Caffery LJ, Whitty JA, Soyer HP, Gordon LG. Cost-effectiveness of skin cancer referral and consultation using teledermoscopy in Australia. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:694–700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
63.
64.
Janda M, Horsham C, Koh U, Gillespie N, Vagenas D, Loescher LJ, et al. Evaluating healthcare practitioners’ views on store-and-forward teledermoscopy services for the diagnosis of skin cancer. Digit Health. 2019;5:2055207619828225.PubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Vestergaard T, Andersen MK, Bygum A. Acceptance of teledermoscopy by general practitioners and dermatologists in Denmark. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11:e2021033.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
67.
Manahan MN, Soyer HP, Loescher LJ, Horsham C, Vagenas D, Whiteman DC, et al. A pilot trial of mobile, patient-performed teledermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:1072–80.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Johansson Backman E, Terstappen K, Paoli J. Teledermoscopy images acquired in primary health care and hospital settings - a comparative study of image quality. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:1038–43.PubMedCrossRef
69.
70.
Seiverling EV, Prentiss MA, Houk L, Alfiero RC, Markham AA, Ottolini MC, et al. Evaluation of a pediatric dermatology electronic consult program in a rural state with subanalysis of infantile hemangioma cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39:923–6.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Kim GE, Afanasiev OK, O’Dell C, Sharp C, Ko JM. Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care store-and-forward teledermatology consultation workflow built within an existing electronic health record system. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26:125–31.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Ayaz M, Pasha MF, Alzahrani MY, Budiarto R, Stiawan D. The Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard: systematic literature review of implementations, applications, challenges and opportunities. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9:e21929.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Mohan GC, Molina GE, Stavert R. Store and forward teledermatology improves dermatology knowledge among referring primary care providers: a survey-based cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:960–1.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Seiverling EV, Li D, Stevens K, Cyr P, Dorr G, Ahrns H. Distance learning and spaced review to complement dermoscopy training for primary care. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11:e2021030.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
76.
Lu MD, Usatine R, Holt J, Harper DM, Verdieck A. Dermoscopy training in family medicine residencies: a CERA survey of program directors. Fam Med. 2023;55:259–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Seiverling EV, Prentiss MA, Stevens K, Stoddard H, Cyr PR, Ahrns H. Impact of dermoscopy training for primary care practitioners on number needed to biopsy to detect melanoma. PRiMER. 2023;7:276659.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Mahmood F, Cyr J, Keely E, Afkham A, Guglani S, Walker J, et al. Teledermatology utilization and integration in residency training over the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cutan Med Surg. 2022;26:135–42.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Jew OS, Murthy AS, Danley K, McMahon PJ. Implementation of a pediatric provider-to-provider store-and-forward teledermatology system: effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability in a pilot study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:1106–12.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Kaushik A, Natsis N, Gordon SC, Seiverling EV. A practical review of dermoscopy for pediatric dermatology part I: melanocytic growths. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:789–97.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Natsis NE, Gordon SC, Kaushik A, Seiverling EV. A practical review of dermoscopy for pediatric dermatology part II: vascular tumors, infections, and inflammatory dermatoses. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:798–803.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Fabbrocini G, DE Fata Salvatores G, Donnarumma M, Marino V, Villani A, Pietrosanto A, et al. Teledermoscopy: a promising tool in pediatric practice. Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2022;157:213–4.PubMed
83.
Ashrafzadeh S, Peters GA, Brandling-Bennett HA, Huang JT. The geographic distribution of the US pediatric dermatologist workforce: a national cross-sectional study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:1098–105.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Fernández Faith E, Shah SD, Braun M, Pope E, Lara-Corrales I, Witman PM, et al. Incidence and clinical factors associated with ulceration in infantile hemangiomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88:414–20.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Kusari A, Reiley H, Seiverling E. A lesion on the abdomen in an infant. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(Suppl 2):117–8.PubMedCrossRef
86.
•• Calafiore R, Khan A, Anderson D, Wu ZH, Lu J. Impact of dermoscopy-aided pediatric teledermatology program on the accessibility and efficiency of dermatology care at community health centers. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;1357633X211068275. A descriptive, retrospective cohort study of a teledermatology program with dermoscopy, showing increase in efficiency and access to care compared to the traditional referral system.
87.
Altamura D, Avramidis M, Menzies SW. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:502–6.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Argenziano G, Mordente I, Ferrara G, Sgambato A, Annese P, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopic monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions: clinical outcome and patient compliance vary according to follow-up protocols. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:331–6.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, et al. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:805–14.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Vázquez-López F, Coto-Segura P, Fueyo-Casado A, Pérez-Oliva N. Dermoscopy of port-wine stains. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:962.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Shirakawa M, Ozawa T, Wakami S, Ishii M, Harada T. Utility of Dermoscopy before and after laser irradiation in port wine stains. Ann Dermatol. 2012;24:7–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
92.
Kwiek B, Rożalski M, Sieczych J, Paluch Ł, Kowalewski C, Ambroziak M. Predictive value of dermoscopy for the treatment of port-wine stains with large spot 532 nm laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51:569–83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Role of Dermoscopy in Provider-to-Provider Store-and-Forward Dermatology eConsults: A Scoping Review of the Recent Literature
Authors
Zhuoqing S. Gellatly
Imene B. Lagha
Niels Kvorning Ternov
Elizabeth Berry
Kelly C. Nelson
Elizabeth V. Seiverling
Publication date
10-10-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Skin Cancer
Published in
Current Dermatology Reports / Issue 4/2023
Electronic ISSN: 2162-4933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-023-00407-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Current Dermatology Reports 4/2023 Go to the issue

HOT TOPIC

Oral Minoxidil Therapy in Hair Loss: Where Do We Stand?

REVIEW

Patch Testing in Atopic Children: Is There a Difference?

REVIEW

Toward a Molecular Diagnosis: Looking Under the Skin at Allergic Contact Dermatitis

REVIEW

Inpatient Evaluation and Management of Generalized Pustular Dermatoses

Correction

Correction: Oral Minoxidil Therapy in Hair Loss: Where Do We Stand?

REVIEW

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Systemic Side Effects: Overview for the Inpatient Dermatologist