Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-01-2024 | Skin Cancer | Original Paper

MMS hotspots: a cross-sectional comparison of U.S. counties with and without Mohs micrographic surgery

Authors: Ajay Nair Sharma, Nicholas Peterman, Margit Juhasz, Melissa Shive

Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Healthcare access greatly impacts skin cancer diagnosis and mortality rates. Recognition of current disparities in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) access can assist future policy and clinical decisions to correct them. For the years 2014–2018, the CPT codes for MMS (17,311 and 17,313) were counted on a per county level across the United States per the Medicare Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Prescriber Database. Any county with 0 MMS CPT codes recorded were classified as “without MMS cases.” MMS “hotspots” were identified as counties that possessed a high average number of MMS cases compared to the national average, while also being surrounded by counties that possessed a low average number of MMS cases compared to the national average. Three thousand eighty-four counties in the United States were analyzed; 785 (25%) counties were designated as “with MMS cases” and 2301 (75%) “without MMS cases.” There were no significant differences in age, ethnicity distribution, or cost per enrollee between the two designations. 74% of counties with MMS cases were considered urban, while only 25% of those without cases were urban (p < 0.01). The median household income was markedly higher in counties with MMS cases ($71,428 vs. $58,913, p < 0.01). With respect to education, more individuals in counties with MMS cases possessed their General Education Development (GED) (89% vs. 86%, p < 0.01) or a college degree (30% vs. 19%, p < 0.01). Forty-nine counties were considered MMS “hotspots.” The density of MMS procedures varies greatly based on geography, maintaining the urban–rural disparity matched by the distribution of MMS surgeons. Additionally, there remains a wide income and educational gap between counties with and without MMS. Identifying MMS hotspots may facilitate further investigation into potential surgical access disparities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beaulieu D, Fathi R, Srivastava D, Nijhawan RI (2018) Current perspectives on Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beaulieu D, Fathi R, Srivastava D, Nijhawan RI (2018) Current perspectives on Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Apalla Z, Nashan D, Weller RB, Castellsagué X (2017) Skin Cancer: Epidemiology, Disease Burden, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Approaches. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 7:5–19CrossRefPubMed Apalla Z, Nashan D, Weller RB, Castellsagué X (2017) Skin Cancer: Epidemiology, Disease Burden, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Approaches. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 7:5–19CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166:1069–1080CrossRefPubMed Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166:1069–1080CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wolff T, Tai E, Miller T (2009) Screening for skin cancer: An update of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 150:194–198CrossRef Wolff T, Tai E, Miller T (2009) Screening for skin cancer: An update of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 150:194–198CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sedghi T, Gronbeck C, Feng H (2021) Comparison of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of counties with and without mohs micrographic surgeons: A cross-sectional medicare analysis. Dermatol Surg 47:1655–1657CrossRefPubMed Sedghi T, Gronbeck C, Feng H (2021) Comparison of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of counties with and without mohs micrographic surgeons: A cross-sectional medicare analysis. Dermatol Surg 47:1655–1657CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Feng H, Belkin D, Geronemus RG (2019) Geographic Distribution of US Mohs Micrographic Surgery Workforce. Dermatol Surg 45:160–163CrossRefPubMed Feng H, Belkin D, Geronemus RG (2019) Geographic Distribution of US Mohs Micrographic Surgery Workforce. Dermatol Surg 45:160–163CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Anselin L (1995) Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115CrossRef Anselin L (1995) Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Resneck JS, Kostecki J (2011) An Analysis of Dermatologist Migration Patterns After Residency Training. Arch Dermatol 147:1065–1070CrossRef Resneck JS, Kostecki J (2011) An Analysis of Dermatologist Migration Patterns After Residency Training. Arch Dermatol 147:1065–1070CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Glazer AM, Farberg AS, Winkelmann RR, Rigel DS (2017) Analysis of Trends in Geographic Distribution and Density of US Dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol 153:322–325CrossRefPubMed Glazer AM, Farberg AS, Winkelmann RR, Rigel DS (2017) Analysis of Trends in Geographic Distribution and Density of US Dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol 153:322–325CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tripathi R, Knusel KD, Ezaldein HH, Scott JF, Bordeaux JS (2018) Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics With Differences in Use of Outpatient Dermatology Services in the United States. JAMA Dermatol 154:1286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tripathi R, Knusel KD, Ezaldein HH, Scott JF, Bordeaux JS (2018) Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics With Differences in Use of Outpatient Dermatology Services in the United States. JAMA Dermatol 154:1286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Connolly SM et al (2012) AAD/ACMS/ASDSA/ASMS 2012 appropriate use criteria for Mohs micrographic surgery: A report of the American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association, and the American Society for Mohs Surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 67:531–550CrossRef Connolly SM et al (2012) AAD/ACMS/ASDSA/ASMS 2012 appropriate use criteria for Mohs micrographic surgery: A report of the American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association, and the American Society for Mohs Surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 67:531–550CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Campbell RM, Perlis CS, Malik MK, Dufresne RG (2007) Characteristics of Mohs Practices in the United States: A Recall Survey of ACMS Surgeons. Dermatol Surg 33:1413–1418CrossRefPubMed Campbell RM, Perlis CS, Malik MK, Dufresne RG (2007) Characteristics of Mohs Practices in the United States: A Recall Survey of ACMS Surgeons. Dermatol Surg 33:1413–1418CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MMS hotspots: a cross-sectional comparison of U.S. counties with and without Mohs micrographic surgery
Authors
Ajay Nair Sharma
Nicholas Peterman
Margit Juhasz
Melissa Shive
Publication date
01-01-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Electronic ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02751-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Archives of Dermatological Research 1/2024 Go to the issue