Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2008

01-11-2008

Significance of perivascular soft tissue around the common hepatic and proximal superior mesenteric arteries arising after pancreaticoduodenectomy: evaluation with serial MDCT studies

Authors: Kousei Ishigami, Kengo Yoshimitsu, Hiroyuki Irie, Tsuyoshi Tajima, Yoshiki Asayama, Masakazu Hirakawa, Daisuke Kakihara, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Yunosuke Nishihara, Koji Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Honda

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the interval change of perivascular soft tissue (PVST) around the common hepatic and proximal superior mesenteric arteries arising after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to compare the difference between post operative change (benign PVST) and recurrence (malignant PVST).

Materials and methods

Serial multidetector CT (MDCT) studies in 44 patients who underwent PD for periampullary carcinomas were retrospectively reviewed (Group A). The incidence and interval change of PVST were evaluated and compared to control group (Group B, 21 patients with PD for benign diseases).

Results

PVST was seen in all the 44 patients in Group A, and it was noted in 12 of 21 (57.1%) patients in Group B. Thirteen of 44 (29.5%) patients showed interval enlargement of PVST (malignant PVST), and 12 of 13 developed within 2 years after PD. There was higher incidence of malignant PVST in patients with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.01) and those with pancreas head carcinoma (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PVST is common after PD regardless of whether patients had malignant or benign diseases. PVST should be monitored for at least 2 years to distinguish recurrence from post operative change. Patients with lymph node metastasis and pancreas head carcinoma had a higher incidence of malignant PVST.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4(6):567–579PubMedCrossRef Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4(6):567–579PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sandrasegaran K, Maglinte DD, Howard TJ, Lappas JC (2005) Surgery for chronic pancreatitis: cross-sectional imaging of postoperative anatomy and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1118–1127PubMed Sandrasegaran K, Maglinte DD, Howard TJ, Lappas JC (2005) Surgery for chronic pancreatitis: cross-sectional imaging of postoperative anatomy and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1118–1127PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28(3):384–391PubMedCrossRef Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH (2003) CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 28(3):384–391PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coombs RJ, Zeiss J, Howard JM, Thomford NR, Merrick HW (1990) CT of the abdomen after the Whipple procedure: value in depicting postoperative anatomy, surgical complications, and tumor recurrence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(5):1011–1014PubMed Coombs RJ, Zeiss J, Howard JM, Thomford NR, Merrick HW (1990) CT of the abdomen after the Whipple procedure: value in depicting postoperative anatomy, surgical complications, and tumor recurrence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(5):1011–1014PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lepanto L, Gianfelice D, Dery R, Dagenais M, Lapointe R, Roy A (1994) Postoperative changes, complications, and recurrent disease after Whipple’s operation: CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(4):841–846PubMed Lepanto L, Gianfelice D, Dery R, Dagenais M, Lapointe R, Roy A (1994) Postoperative changes, complications, and recurrent disease after Whipple’s operation: CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(4):841–846PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman J (1992) CT evaluation following Whipple procedure: potential pitfalls in interpretation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16(5):704–708PubMedCrossRef Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman J (1992) CT evaluation following Whipple procedure: potential pitfalls in interpretation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16(5):704–708PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Lemmerling M, de Hemptinne B, De Vos M, De Bock G, Kunnen M (2000) Postoperative findings following the Whipple procedure: determination of prevalence and morphologic abdominal CT features. Eur Radiol 10(1):123–128PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Lemmerling M, de Hemptinne B, De Vos M, De Bock G, Kunnen M (2000) Postoperative findings following the Whipple procedure: determination of prevalence and morphologic abdominal CT features. Eur Radiol 10(1):123–128PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Abrams RA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Fishman EK (1997) Recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT evaluation following the Whipple procedure. Radiographics 17(2):303–313PubMed Bluemke DA, Abrams RA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Fishman EK (1997) Recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT evaluation following the Whipple procedure. Radiographics 17(2):303–313PubMed
9.
go back to reference Johnson PT, Curry CA, Urban BA, Fishman EK (2002) Spiral CT following the Whipple procedure: distinguishing normal postoperative findings from complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(6):956–961PubMedCrossRef Johnson PT, Curry CA, Urban BA, Fishman EK (2002) Spiral CT following the Whipple procedure: distinguishing normal postoperative findings from complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(6):956–961PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kelvin FM, Korobkin M, Heaston DK, Grant JP, Akwari O (1983) The pelvis after surgery for rectal carcinoma: serial CT observations with emphasis on nonneoplastic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141(5):959–964PubMed Kelvin FM, Korobkin M, Heaston DK, Grant JP, Akwari O (1983) The pelvis after surgery for rectal carcinoma: serial CT observations with emphasis on nonneoplastic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141(5):959–964PubMed
11.
go back to reference Adalsteinsson B, Pahlman L, Hemmingsson A, Glimelius B, Graffman S (1987) Computed tomography in early diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol 28(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef Adalsteinsson B, Pahlman L, Hemmingsson A, Glimelius B, Graffman S (1987) Computed tomography in early diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol 28(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mendez RJ, Rodriguez R, Kovacevich T, Martinez S, Moreno G, Cerdan J (1993) CT in local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17(5):741–744PubMedCrossRef Mendez RJ, Rodriguez R, Kovacevich T, Martinez S, Moreno G, Cerdan J (1993) CT in local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17(5):741–744PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C, Tarulli G (1997) MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22(3):338–342PubMedCrossRef Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C, Tarulli G (1997) MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22(3):338–342PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Luppi G, Romagnoli R (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 28(1):19–27PubMedCrossRef Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Luppi G, Romagnoli R (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 28(1):19–27PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors 6th ed. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, (eds). New York: Willey International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors 6th ed. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, (eds). New York: Willey
16.
go back to reference Barkin JS, Goldstein JA (1999) Diagnostic approach to pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 28(3):709–722PubMedCrossRef Barkin JS, Goldstein JA (1999) Diagnostic approach to pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 28(3):709–722PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Furukawa H, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Ushio K (1977) Helical CT of the abdomen after pancreaticoduodenectomy: usefulness for detecting postoperative complications. Hepatogastroenterology 44(15):849–855 Furukawa H, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Ushio K (1977) Helical CT of the abdomen after pancreaticoduodenectomy: usefulness for detecting postoperative complications. Hepatogastroenterology 44(15):849–855
18.
go back to reference Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M, Chijiiwa K, Nagakawa T, Imamura M, Takada T (1999) Early and late complications of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in Japan 1998. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6(3):303–311PubMedCrossRef Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M, Chijiiwa K, Nagakawa T, Imamura M, Takada T (1999) Early and late complications of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in Japan 1998. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6(3):303–311PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226(3):248–260PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226(3):248–260PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shimizu A, Nakagawa N, Terayama K, et al. (1999) Non-tumorous soft tissue density emerged after surgery for gastric carcinoma; evaluation with CT. Rinsho Hoshasen 44(8):931–937 Shimizu A, Nakagawa N, Terayama K, et al. (1999) Non-tumorous soft tissue density emerged after surgery for gastric carcinoma; evaluation with CT. Rinsho Hoshasen 44(8):931–937
21.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 24(2):155–164PubMedCrossRef Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 24(2):155–164PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, et al. (1996) Late contrast-enhanced CT for small pancreatic carcinoma: delayed enhanced area on CT with histopathological correlation. Hepatogastroenterology 43(11):1230–1237PubMed Furukawa H, Takayasu K, Mukai K, et al. (1996) Late contrast-enhanced CT for small pancreatic carcinoma: delayed enhanced area on CT with histopathological correlation. Hepatogastroenterology 43(11):1230–1237PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kelekis NL, Makri E, Vassiou A, Patsiaoura K, Spiridakis M, Dalekos GN (2004) Confluent hepatic fibrosis as the presenting imaging sign in nonadvanced alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Imaging 28(2):124–127PubMedCrossRef Kelekis NL, Makri E, Vassiou A, Patsiaoura K, Spiridakis M, Dalekos GN (2004) Confluent hepatic fibrosis as the presenting imaging sign in nonadvanced alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Imaging 28(2):124–127PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ruf J, Lopez Hanninen E, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5(2–3):266–272PubMedCrossRef Ruf J, Lopez Hanninen E, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 5(2–3):266–272PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Significance of perivascular soft tissue around the common hepatic and proximal superior mesenteric arteries arising after pancreaticoduodenectomy: evaluation with serial MDCT studies
Authors
Kousei Ishigami
Kengo Yoshimitsu
Hiroyuki Irie
Tsuyoshi Tajima
Yoshiki Asayama
Masakazu Hirakawa
Daisuke Kakihara
Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Yunosuke Nishihara
Koji Yamaguchi
Hiroshi Honda
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9359-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Abdominal Radiology 6/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.