Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Shoulder Instability | Research

Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Finnish version of Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI)

Authors: Sami P Elamo, J P Kukkonen, T E Flinkkilä, J T Lehtinen, A K Joukainen, J J Paloneva, K K Lehtimäki, T T Kauko, V O Äärimaa

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) is a widely used disease-specific self-assessment measurement tool for patients with shoulder instability. The main aim of this study was to translate and cross culturally adapt the WOSI into Finnish language and to test its measurement properties.

Methods

WOSI was translated in Finnish and adapted into an electronic user interface. 62 male patients with traumatic anteroinferior shoulder instability, programmed for stabilizing shoulder surgery, answered the questionnaire twice preoperatively (2 and 0 weeks), and twice postoperatively (3 and 12 months). Additional scoring tools, such as satisfaction to treatment outcome, subjective shoulder value (SSV), Oxford shoulder instability index (OSIS) and Constant score (CS), were used as comparators. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of WOSI were investigated through statistical analysis.

Results

Preoperative test-retest results were available for 49 patients, and 54 patients were available at final follow up. The mean WOSI was 57.8 (SD 20.3), 70.4 (SD 18.9), and 85.9 (SD 15.5), at baseline, 3, and 12 months, respectively. There was a statistically significant mean improvement of 28.8 (SD 24.5) in WOSI between baseline and 12 months (p < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the preoperative WOSI was excellent 0.91. At 12 months WOSI had an excellent Pearson’s correlation coefficient both with SSV (0.69), OSIS (-0.81), and poor with CS (0.25) scores, confirming our a priori hypothesis. There were no detected floor nor ceiling effects for WOSI pre- or postoperatively. The calculated minimal detectable change was 9.2 and the estimated minimal clinically important difference 13.4 to 18.1.

Conclusion

Finnish version of WOSI is a reliable and valid tool for assessing health state and improvement after operative treatment of shoulder instability in young male patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hovelius L. Incidence of shoulder dislocation in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982(166):127–31. Hovelius L. Incidence of shoulder dislocation in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982(166):127–31.
2.
go back to reference Shah A, Judge A, Delmestri A, et al. Incidence of shoulder dislocations in the UK, 1995–2015: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e016112.CrossRef Shah A, Judge A, Delmestri A, et al. Incidence of shoulder dislocations in the UK, 1995–2015: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e016112.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(6):764–72.CrossRef Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(6):764–72.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1109–20.CrossRef Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1109–20.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rouleau DM, Faber K, MacDermid JC. Systematic review of patient-administered shoulder functional scores on instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):1121–8.CrossRef Rouleau DM, Faber K, MacDermid JC. Systematic review of patient-administered shoulder functional scores on instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):1121–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61–3.CrossRef Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alvarez K, Wang Y, Alegria M, et al. Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1074–86.CrossRef Alvarez K, Wang Y, Alegria M, et al. Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1074–86.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.CrossRef World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):717–21.CrossRef Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):717–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(3):420–6.CrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(3):420–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–4.CrossRef Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):507–28.CrossRef Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9):507–28.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wells G, Beaton D, Shea B, et al. Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(2):406–12. Wells G, Beaton D, Shea B, et al. Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(2):406–12.
18.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRef McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(8):861–74.CrossRef Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(8):861–74.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, et al. Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(12):1650–5.CrossRef Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, et al. Investigating minimal clinically important difference for constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(12):1650–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S, et al. Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers. Orthopade. 2010;39(7):711–8.CrossRef Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S, et al. Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers. Orthopade. 2010;39(7):711–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Salomonsson B, Ahlstrom S, Dalen N, et al. The western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a swedish translation. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(2):233–8.CrossRef Salomonsson B, Ahlstrom S, Dalen N, et al. The western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a swedish translation. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(2):233–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hatta T, Shinozaki N, Omi R, et al. Reliability and validity of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) in the japanese population. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(6):732–6.CrossRef Hatta T, Shinozaki N, Omi R, et al. Reliability and validity of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) in the japanese population. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(6):732–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Griffin SH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of an italian version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):559–67.CrossRef Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Griffin SH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of an italian version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):559–67.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference van der Linde JA, Willems WJ, van Kampen DA, et al. Measurement properties of the western Ontario shoulder instability index in dutch patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:211.CrossRef van der Linde JA, Willems WJ, van Kampen DA, et al. Measurement properties of the western Ontario shoulder instability index in dutch patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:211.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Perrin C, Khiami F, Beguin L, et al. Translation and validation of the french version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): WOSI-Fr. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(2):141–9.CrossRef Perrin C, Khiami F, Beguin L, et al. Translation and validation of the french version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): WOSI-Fr. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(2):141–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Basar S, Gunaydin G, Hazar Kanik Z, et al. Western Ontario shoulder instability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the turkish version. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(9):1559–65.CrossRef Basar S, Gunaydin G, Hazar Kanik Z, et al. Western Ontario shoulder instability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the turkish version. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(9):1559–65.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Eshoj H, Bak K, Blond L, et al. Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the danish western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014053.CrossRef Eshoj H, Bak K, Blond L, et al. Translation, adaptation and measurement properties of an electronic version of the danish western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014053.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gottlieb U, Springer S. Translation and validation of a hebrew version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):245.CrossRef Gottlieb U, Springer S. Translation and validation of a hebrew version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):245.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bejer A, Plocki J, Kulczyk M, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Polish Version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI-PL) in patients after arthroscopic repair for shoulder instability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14015.CrossRef Bejer A, Plocki J, Kulczyk M, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Polish Version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI-PL) in patients after arthroscopic repair for shoulder instability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14015.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Torres RM, Faria SI, Cavalheiro LM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the european Portuguese Version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Acta Med Port. 2022;35(7–8):522–8.CrossRef Torres RM, Faria SI, Cavalheiro LM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the european Portuguese Version of the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Acta Med Port. 2022;35(7–8):522–8.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Scholtes VA, Terwee CB, Poolman RW. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Injury. 2011;42(3):236–40.CrossRef Scholtes VA, Terwee CB, Poolman RW. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Injury. 2011;42(3):236–40.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134(8):889–95. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134(8):889–95.
34.
go back to reference Kemp KA, Sheps DM, Beaupre LA, et al. An evaluation of the responsiveness and discriminant validity of shoulder questionnaires among patients receiving surgical correction of shoulder instability. Sci World J. 2012;2012:410125.CrossRef Kemp KA, Sheps DM, Beaupre LA, et al. An evaluation of the responsiveness and discriminant validity of shoulder questionnaires among patients receiving surgical correction of shoulder instability. Sci World J. 2012;2012:410125.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kirkley A, Werstine R, Ratjek A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder: long-term evaluation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(1):55–63.CrossRef Kirkley A, Werstine R, Ratjek A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder: long-term evaluation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(1):55–63.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, et al. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2326–36.CrossRef Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, et al. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2326–36.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Flinkkila T, Knape R, Sirnio K, et al. Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair: minimum 10 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(1):94–9.CrossRef Flinkkila T, Knape R, Sirnio K, et al. Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair: minimum 10 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(1):94–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Finnish version of Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI)
Authors
Sami P Elamo
J P Kukkonen
T E Flinkkilä
J T Lehtinen
A K Joukainen
J J Paloneva
K K Lehtimäki
T T Kauko
V O Äärimaa
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06029-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue