Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 8/2022

28-05-2022 | Original Article

Shine-through artifact due to high-radioactivity bladder and bowel gas in 18F-FDG PET/CT: impact of time-of-flight algorithm and radioactivity concentration of urine in the bladder on the occurrence of the artifacts

Authors: Yoya Tomita, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Shine-though artifact can appear as regions with falsely increased uptake in the immediate vicinity of large hot sources in 18F-FDG PET/CT. This artifact may adversely affect the assessment of tumor involvement in the regions adjacent to the bladder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of shine-through artifacts in clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations and the factors that can influence their occurrence and extent.

Methods

PET/CT images were acquired with Discovery PET/CT 690. One hundred six patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for clinical purposes were retrospectively reviewed. PET images were reconstructed using 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization with and without time-of-flight (TOF). The shine-through artifact was defined as an erroneous accumulation of 18F-FDG between the bladder and the air region in the intestine without attenuation correction (AC) errors. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the artifact was measured, and the effect of TOF on this artifact was evaluated. The SUVmax in the bladder was compared in patients with and without the artifacts. A phantom containing two spheres simulating bladder and rectal gas was imaged while changing the radioactivity of 18F-FDG solution in the bladder sphere. The relationship between the bladder sphere radioactivity and the SUVmax of the shine-through artifacts was evaluated.

Results

The shine-through artifact was more frequently observed on PET images reconstructed without TOF (12/106, 11.3%) as compared to PET images with TOF (8/106, 7.5%, p = 0.046). The SUVmax of the shine-through artifacts was significantly decreased by TOF reconstruction compared to non-TOF reconstruction (4.7 ± 1.7 vs 7.6 ± 3.1, p = 0.0078). The mean SUVmax of urinary bladders in patients with the artifacts was significantly higher than those without the artifacts on non-TOF images (74.9 ± 61.1 vs 46.3 ± 35.2, p = 0.038). In the phantom study, the SUVmax of the shine-through artifact increased as the radioactivity in the bladder-simulating sphere increased.

Conclusion

Shine-through artifacts were observed in approximately 10% of clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. Their magnitude is significantly associated with the radioactivity in the bladder and can be reduced by employing TOF. Recognizing this artifact allows for a more accurate interpretation of 18F-FDG pelvic studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol. 2005;33:156–61 (quiz 163–4).PubMed Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol. 2005;33:156–61 (quiz 163–4).PubMed
2.
go back to reference Blodgett TM, Mehta AS, Mehta AS, Laymon CM, Carney J, Townsend DW. PET/CT artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:49–63.CrossRef Blodgett TM, Mehta AS, Mehta AS, Laymon CM, Carney J, Townsend DW. PET/CT artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:49–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Udall DN, Wahl RL. Characterization of a perirectal artifact in 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1501–6.CrossRef Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Udall DN, Wahl RL. Characterization of a perirectal artifact in 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1501–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liu Y. Invalidity of SUV measurements of lesions in close proximity to hot sources due to “shine-through” effect on FDG PET-CT interpretation. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012: 867218.PubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y. Invalidity of SUV measurements of lesions in close proximity to hot sources due to “shine-through” effect on FDG PET-CT interpretation. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012: 867218.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Abdul-Fatah SB, Zamburlini M, Halders SG, Brans B, Teule GJ, Kemerink GJ. Identification of a shine-through artifact in the trachea with (124)I PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:909–11.CrossRef Abdul-Fatah SB, Zamburlini M, Halders SG, Brans B, Teule GJ, Kemerink GJ. Identification of a shine-through artifact in the trachea with (124)I PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:909–11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PETCT Discovery-690. Med Phys. 2011;38:5394–411.CrossRef Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PETCT Discovery-690. Med Phys. 2011;38:5394–411.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ullah MN, Pratiwi E, Cheon J, Choi H, Yeom JY. Instrumentation for time-of-flight positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;50:112–22.CrossRef Ullah MN, Pratiwi E, Cheon J, Choi H, Yeom JY. Instrumentation for time-of-flight positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;50:112–22.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Conti M, Jakoby BW, Lois C, Townsend DW. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1315–23.CrossRef Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Conti M, Jakoby BW, Lois C, Townsend DW. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1315–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Surti S. Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:98–105.CrossRef Surti S. Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:98–105.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Conti M. Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1147–57.CrossRef Conti M. Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1147–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRef Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Son JW, Kim KY, Yoon HS, Won JY, Ko GB, Lee MS, et al. Proof-of-concept prototype time-of-flight PET system based on high-quantum-efficiency multianode PMTs. Med Phys. 2017;44:5314–24.CrossRef Son JW, Kim KY, Yoon HS, Won JY, Ko GB, Lee MS, et al. Proof-of-concept prototype time-of-flight PET system based on high-quantum-efficiency multianode PMTs. Med Phys. 2017;44:5314–24.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conti M. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:155–68.CrossRef Conti M. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:155–68.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Conti M. State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET. Phys Med. 2009;25:1–11.CrossRef Conti M. State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET. Phys Med. 2009;25:1–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Shine-through artifact due to high-radioactivity bladder and bowel gas in 18F-FDG PET/CT: impact of time-of-flight algorithm and radioactivity concentration of urine in the bladder on the occurrence of the artifacts
Authors
Yoya Tomita
Yasutaka Ichikawa
Hajime Sakuma
Publication date
28-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-022-01756-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 8/2022 Go to the issue