Top

Hernia

Published in:

01-06-2019 | Seroma | Review

Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: A. Aiolfi, M. Cavalli, G. Micheletto, P. G. Bruni, F. Lombardo, C. Perali, G. Bonitta, D. Bona

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the current evidence on the therapeutic role and outcomes of robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) to better define its risk–benefit ratio and guide clinical decision-making.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were consulted. A Frequentist single-arm study-level random effect meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Twelve studies published between 2015 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria (1645 patients). Patients’ age ranged from 16 to 96, the BMI ranged from 19 to 35.6 kg/m², and 86.1% were males. Unilateral hernia repair was performed in 69.6% while bilateral hernia repair was performed in 30.4% of patients. The operations were all conducted using the da Vinci Xi or Si robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The rTAPP was successfully completed in 99.4% of patients and the operative time ranged from 45 to 180.4 min. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 16 to 368 days. The estimated pooled prevalence of intraoperative complications and conversion were 0.03% (95% CI 0.00–0.3) and 0.14% (95% CI 0.0–0.5%), respectively. The estimated pooled prevalence of urinary retention, seroma/hematoma, and overall complications were 3.5% (95% CI 1.6–5.8%), 4.1% (95% CI 1.6–7.5%), and 7.4% (95% CI 3.4–10.9%). The estimated pooled prevalence of hernia recurrence was 0.18% (95% CI 0.00–0.84%).

Conclusions

Robotic technology has been progressively entering surgical thinking and gradually changing surgical procedures. Based on the results of the present study, the rTAPP seems feasible, safe, and effective in the short term for patients with unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J, Bisgaard T, Buhck H, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Grimes KL, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Kumar S, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P, International Endohernia Society (2015) Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc 29:289–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8 CrossRefPubMed

Kudsi OY, McCarty JC, Paluvoi N, Mabardy AS (2017) Transition from laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience. World J Surg 41:2251–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3 CrossRefPubMed

Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Micheletto G, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Morlacchi A, Bruni PG, Campanelli G, Bona D (2019) Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2

Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:39–45 (discussion 45) CrossRefPubMed

Finley DS, Rodriguez Jr E, Ahlering TE (2007) Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience. J Urol 178:1296–1299 (discussion 1299–300) CrossRefPubMed

Ito F, Jarrard D, Gould JC (2008) Transabdominal preperitoneal robotic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:397–399. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2007.0093 CrossRefPubMed

Engan C, Engan M, Bonilla V, Dyer DC, Randall BR (2015) Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes. Hernia 19:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1311-z CrossRefPubMed

Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, Rabaza J, Gonzalez A (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:4042–4048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5 CrossRefPubMed

Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O, Konkoly-Thege A, Moon J (2016) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: technique and early experience. Am Surg 82(10):1014–1017PubMed

10.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 21(4):607–611CrossRef

13.

Miller JJ (1978) The inverse of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Am Stat 32:138

14.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188CrossRefPubMed

15.

Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 6(4):404–413CrossRef

16.

Anzures-Cabrera J, Higgins JP (2010) Graphical displays for meta-analysis: an overview with suggestions for practice. Res Synth Methods. 1(1):66–80CrossRefPubMed

17.

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT et al (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef

19.

Development Core Team R (2015) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

20.

Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A, D'Amico L, Richardson C, Rabaza J, Kolachalam R (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1769-1 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Köckerling F, Bittner R, Jacob DA, Seidelmann L, Keller T, Adolf D, Kraft B, Kuthe A (2015) TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 29:3750–3760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4150-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Wu JJ, Way JA, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2018) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal versus open repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 5:1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4288-9 CrossRef

24.

Tam V, Rogers DE, Al-Abbas A, Borrebach J, Dunn SA, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, Hogg ME (2018) Robotic inguinal hernia repair: a large health system's experience with the first 300 cases and review of the literature. J Surg Res 235:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Solodkyy A, Feretis M, Fedotovs A, Di Franco F, Gergely S, Harris AM (2018) Elective "true day case" laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a district general hospital: lessons learned from 1000 consecutive cases. Minim Invasive Surg 3:7123754. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7123754 CrossRef

26.

Cetrulo LN, Harmon J, Ortiz J, Canter D, Joshi AR (2015) Case report of a robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of a giant incarcerated recurrent inguinal hernia containing bladder and ureters. Int J Med Robot 11(1):15–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1597 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Iraniha A, Peloquin J (2018) Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 12:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Abdelmoaty WF, Dunst CM, Neighorn C, Swanstrom LL, Hammill CW (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T, Wolf L, Guo D (2018) Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg 12(4):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0790-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Edelman DS (2018) Robotic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 83:1418–1421

31.

Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Tache-Leon CA, Hallowell PT, Sawyer RG, Yang Z (2018) Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Surg Endosc 32:2131–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5911-4 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Muysoms F, Van Cleven S, Kyle-Leinhase I, Ballecer C, Ramaswamy A (2018) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic groin hernia repair: observational case–control study on the operative time during the learning curve. Surg Endosc 32:4850–4859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6236-7 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kosturakis AK, LaRusso KE, Carroll ND, Nicholl MB (2018) First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital. J Robot Surg 12:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0812-7 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Prajapati P, Ogola G, Burkart RD, Le LD (2018) Surgical training in robotic surgery: surgical experience of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation. J Robot Surg 12:487–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0771-4 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: A. Aiolfi
M. Cavalli
G. Micheletto
P. G. Bruni
F. Lombardo
C. Perali
G. Bonitta
D. Bona
Publication date: 01-06-2019
Publisher: Springer Paris
Keywords: Seroma
Hematoma
Inguinal Hernia
Published in: Hernia / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01965-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Is it possible to identify the inguinal nerves during hernioplasty? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of cadaveric and surgical studies

Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature

Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia with an effective, cheap, less invasive, and easy operation: the Trabucco repair

Worldwide hernia repair: variations in the treatment of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in adults in the United Kingdom and in low- and middle-income countries

Open darn repair vs open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies

Sustainability of the relationship between preoperative symptoms and postoperative improvement in quality of life after inguinal hernia repair