Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Hernia
Published in: Hernia 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Shouldice | Review

Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature

Authors: R. Bittner, J. Schwarz

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Currently, three different techniques are favored for repair of an inguinal hernia: (1) The suture repair described by Shouldice. (2) An open mesh repair according to Lichtenstein. (3) Laparo-endoscopic techniques TAPP and TEP. The aim of the presented paper was to describe the ranking of the Transabdominal Preperitoneal Patch Plasty (TAPP) in comparison to the other techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

The manuscript is based on the experiences gained in more than 15,000 TAPPs and numerous own studies as well. The technique of TAPP is described in detail and also the results which can be achieved with special reference to primary unilateral inguinal hernias in male patients. Moreover, a systematic review of the literature is done for the comparison with the other techniques.

Results

According to own experiences, 98% of all patients with an inguinal hernia admitted for surgery to Marienhospital Stuttgart could be operated on using the TAPP technique. The recurrence rate and the rate of severe chronic pain in this setting were below 1%. Due to the limited quality of most of the published studies an evidence-based comparison which is the best of the currently most recommended techniques is questionable. Therefore, when comparing TAPP with TEP, no definite conclusion about superiority of one technique over the other is possible. Both techniques are safe and effective if properly performed. The guidelines recommend that the surgeon should use the technique he had learned best and is familiar with. The comparison between TAPP and the Shouldice repair shows less pain and a higher effectivity after TAPP. The recurrence rate after Lichtenstein repair and after TAPP is similar, but pain and recovery time are significantly less after TAPP.

Conclusion

Analyzing the own abundant experiences and the reports in the literature, the TAPP technique has the potential to become the standard operative technique for repair of inguinal hernias in future. However, due to the low level of evidence of most of the studies definite conclusions are difficult to draw at this point of time.
Literature
1.
Bassini E (1887) Sulla crura radicale dell’ernia inguinale. Arch Soc Ital Chir 4:380–388
2.
Shouldice EE (1945) Surgical treatment of hernia. Ontario Med Rev 12:43
3.
HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165CrossRef
4.
Lichtenstein IL (1970) Hernia repair without disability. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis
5.
Stoppa RE, Petit J, Henry X (1975) Unsutured dacron prosthesis in groin hernias. Int Surg 60(8):411–412PubMed
6.
Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Yucel O (1992) Laparoscopic mesh repair in inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach: a preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:53–58PubMed
7.
Bittner R (2018) Laparoscopic view of surgical anatomy of the groin. Int J Abd Wall Hernia Surgery 1(1):24–31
8.
Bittner R, Chen D, Reinpold W (2018) Clinical anatomy of the groin: posterior laparoscopic approach. In: Bittner R, Koeckerling F, Fitzgibbons R, LeBlanc K, Mittal S, Chowbey P (eds) Laparo-endoscopic hernia surgery evidence based clinical practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–19CrossRef
9.
Rosenberger RJ, Loeweneck H, Meyer G (2000) The cutaneous nerves encountered during laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: new anatomical findings for the surgeon. Surg Endosc 14(8):731–735CrossRefPubMed
10.
Bittner R (2006) Standardtechnik der transabdominellen präperitonealen Patchplastik(TAPP). In: Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Ulrich M (eds) Chirurgie der Leistenhernie. Karger, Basel, pp 115–125CrossRef
11.
Bittner R, Schwarz J (2012) Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbeck’s 397(2):271–282
12.
13.
Bittner R, Kukleta J, Chen D (2018) Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): standard technique and specific risks. In: Bittner R, Koeckerling F, Fitzgibbons R, LeBlanc K, Mittal S, Chowbey P (eds) Laparo-endoscopic hernia surgery evidence based clinical practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–118CrossRef
14.
Bittner R, Schwarz J (2019) Transabdominal preperitoneal mesh. In: Schumpelick V, Arlt G, Conze J, Junge C (eds) Hernia surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 150–157
15.
Azevedo JL, Azevedo OC, Miyahira SA, Miguel GP, Becker OM Jr, Hypólito OH, Machado AC, Cardia W, Yamaguchi GA, Godinho L, Freire D, Almeida CE, Moreira CH, Freire DF (2009) Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 23(7):1428–1432CrossRefPubMed
16.
Semm K, Semm I (1999) Safe insertion of trocars and Veress needle using standard equipment and the eleven security steps. Gynaecol Endosc 8:339–347CrossRef
17.
Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29(5):433–447
18.
Teoh B, Sen R, Abbott J (2005) An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veress needle placement at closed laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(2):153–158.
19.
Hasson HM (1999) Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 8:353–362CrossRef
20.
Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Koeckerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS). Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
22.
Muschalla F, Schwarz J, Bittner R (2016) Effectivity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) in daily clinical practice: early and long-term result. Surg Endosc 30(11):4985–4994CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Mordecai SC, Warren OW, Warren SJ (2012) Radially expanding laparoscopic trocar ports significantly reduce postoperative pain in all age groups. Surg Endosc 26(3):843–846CrossRefPubMed
25.
Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2013) Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Endosc 27(7):2312–2320CrossRefPubMed
26.
Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89(8):1062–1066CrossRefPubMed
27.
Bökeler U, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Zacheja S, Smaxwil C (2013) Teaching and training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Surg Endosc 27(8):2886–2893CrossRefPubMed
28.
Iakovlev V, Koch A, Petersen K, Morrison J, Grischkan D, Oprea V, Bendavid RA (2018) Pathology of mesh and time: dysejaculation, sexual pain, and orchialgia resulting from polypropylene mesh erosion into the spermatic cord. Ann Surg 267(3):569–575CrossRefPubMed
29.
Muschalla F, Schwarz J, Bittner R (2016) Effectivity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) in daily clinical practice: early and long-term result. Surg Endosc 30(11):4985–4994
30.
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Surg Endosc 14(3):289–292CrossRefPubMed
31.
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Recurrence after endoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP): causes, reparative techniques, and results of the reoperation. J Am Coll Surg 190(6):651–655CrossRefPubMed
32.
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Kraft B, Bittner R (2001) Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: Is it feasible? Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 15(10):1179–1183CrossRefPubMed
33.
Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Bittner R (2009) Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) after radical prostatectomy: is it safe? Results of prospectively collected data of more than 200 cases. Surg Endosc 23(5):973–977CrossRefPubMed
34.
Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 24(12):3026–3030CrossRefPubMed
35.
Kraft BM, Jäger C, Kraft K, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2004) The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc 18(8):1216–1223CrossRefPubMed
36.
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Bittner R (1999) Laparoscopic surgery complications associated with trocar tip design: review of literature and own results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(2):135–140CrossRefPubMed
37.
Leibl BJ, Däubler P, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Bittner R (2000) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87(6):780–783CrossRefPubMed
38.
Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Redecke JD, Schmedt CG, Ulrich M, Kraft K, Bittner R (2002) Are postoperative complaints and complications influenced by different techniques in fashioning and fixing the mesh in transperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty? Results of a prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 26(12):1481–1484CrossRefPubMed
39.
Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Schwarz J (2011) Early postoperative and one year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of extralight titanized polypropylene mesh and traditional heavyweight polypropylene mesh on pain and seroma production in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). World J Surg 35(8):1791–1797CrossRefPubMed
40.
Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Schwarz J (2011) One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia 15(5):503–510CrossRefPubMed
41.
Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H (2010) Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology. 112(4):957–969CrossRefPubMed
42.
Bittner R, Gmähle E, Gmähle B, Schwarz J, Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2010) Lightweight mesh and noninvasive fixation: an effective concept for prevention of chronic pain with laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Surg Endosc 24(12):2958–2964CrossRefPubMed
43.
Wei FX, Zhang YC, Han W, Zhang YL, Shao Y, Ni R (2015) Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) for laparoscopic hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25(5):375–383CrossRefPubMed
44.
Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2013) Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Am J Surg 206(2):245–252CrossRefPubMed
45.
Chen LS, Chen WC, Kang YN, Wu CC, Tsai LW, Liu MZ (2019) Effects of transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 33(2):418–428CrossRefPubMed
46.
Butler RE, Burke R, Schneider JJ, Brar H, Lucha PA (2007) The economic impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: results of a double-blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21(3):387–390CrossRefPubMed
47.
Schrenk P, Woisetschläger R, Rieger R, Wayand W (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83(11):1563–1566CrossRefPubMed
48.
Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(1):234–239CrossRefPubMed
49.
Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, Khalil R (2010) Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs. Int J Surg 8(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed
50.
Günal O, Ozer S, Gürleyik E, Bahçebaşi T (2007) Does the approach to the groin make a difference in hernia repair? Hernia 11(5):429–434CrossRefPubMed
51.
Sumpf E, Crozier TA, Ahrens D, Bräuer A, Neufang T, Braun U (2000) Carbon dioxide absorption during extraperitoneal and transperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty. Anesth Analg 91(3):589–595CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zhu Q, Mao Z, Yu B, Jin J, Zheng M, Li J (2009) Effects of persistent CO(2) insufflation during different laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(5):611–614CrossRefPubMed
53.
Gass M, Banz VM, Rosella L, Adamina M, Candinas D, Güller U (2012) TAPP or TEP? Population-based analysis of prospective data on 4552 patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 36(12):2782–2786CrossRefPubMed
54.
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kofler M, Mayer F, Adolf D, Kuthe A, Weyhe D (2019) Lichtenstein versus total extraperitoneal patch plasty versus transabdominal patch plasty technique for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 57,906 patients. Ann Surg 269(2):351–357CrossRefPubMed
55.
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, Fortelny R, Niebuhr H, Mayer F, Schug-Pass C (2018) Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures. Surg Endosc 32(5):2222–2231CrossRefPubMed
56.
57.
58.
Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10(4):309–315CrossRefPubMed
59.
Akhtar K, Kamalky-asl ID, Lamb WR, Laing I, Walton L, Pearson RC, Parrott NR (1998) Metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(2):125–130PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86(3):316–319CrossRefPubMed
61.
Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6(2):56–61CrossRefPubMed
62.
Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389(5):361–365CrossRefPubMed
63.
Berndsen FH, Petersson U, Arvidsson D, Leijonmarck CE, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Montgomery A; SMIL Study Group (2007) Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group. Hernia 11(4):307–313
64.
Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92(9):1085–1091CrossRefPubMed
65.
Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94(5):562–565CrossRefPubMed
66.
Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open non-mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(5):605–615CrossRefPubMed
67.
Salma U, Ahmed I, Ishtiaq S (2015) A comparison of post-operative pain and hospital stay between Lichtenstein’s repair and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair: a randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci 31(5):1062–1066PubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Niccolaï P, Ouchchane L, Libier M, Beouche F, Belon M, Vedrinne JM, El Drayi B, Vallet L, Ruiz F, Biermann C, Duchêne P, Chirat C, Soule-Sonneville S, Dualé C, Dubray C, Schoeffler P (2015) Persistent neuropathic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy depending on the procedure (open mesh v. laparoscopy): a propensity-matched analysis. Can J Surg 58(2):114–120
69.
Kargar S, Shiryazdi SM, Zare M, Mirshamsi MH, Ahmadi S, Neamatzadeh H (2015) Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study. Minerva Chir 70(2):83–89PubMed
70.
Abbas AE, Abd Ellatif ME, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, Amin M, Moatamed A (2012) A Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 26(9):2465–2470CrossRefPubMed
71.
Anadol ZA, Ersoy E, Taneri F, Tekin E (2004) Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus Open Lichtenstein technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(3):159–163CrossRefPubMed
72.
Onofrio L, Cafaro D, Manzo F, Cristiano SF, Sgromo B, Ussia G (2004) Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Minerva Chir 59(4):369–377PubMed
73.
Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit A randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 12(10):1199–1203CrossRefPubMed
74.
Hill AD, Banwell PE, Darzi A, Menzies-Gow N, Monson JR, Guillou PJ (1995) Inflammatory markers following laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9(6):695–698CrossRefPubMed
75.
Wittenbecher F, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Röttger J, Busse R (2012) Comparison of hospital costs and length of stay associated with open-mesh, totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, and transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of observational data using propensity score matching. Surg Endosc 27(4):1326–1333CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature
Authors
R. Bittner
J. Schwarz
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01959-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Hernia 3/2019 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Current status of local anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in developing countries and in the United States

Review

Pure tissue repairs: a timely and critical revival

Original Article

Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review

Invited commentary

Comment on robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over?

Original Article

State of the art: open mesh-based inguinal hernia repair

Review

Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis