Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Intensive Care Medicine
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Septicemia | What’s new in ICM

Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients

Authors: Jonathan A. Silversides, Anders Perner, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Administration of intravenous fluid is one of the most commonly applied therapies in critical care, and has evolved from the replacement of water and electrolytes lost in diarrhoeal illness to the concept of ‘optimising’ cardiac output and thus, it is often incorrectly assumed as tissue perfusion [1]. As critical care transitions from a historical focus on normalisation of physiology towards the rigorous application of evidence-based practices which result in the best possible long-term outcomes, a re-evaluation of the role of basic therapies, such as intravenous fluids, is necessary. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B et al (2018) Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 8:66CrossRef
2.
Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J-L et al (2015) Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: a global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 41:1529–1537CrossRef
3.
Van der Mullen J, Wise R, Vermeulen G et al (2018) Assessment of hypovolaemia in the critically ill. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 50:141–149CrossRef
4.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef
5.
Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP et al (2019) Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock. JAMA 321:654–711CrossRef
6.
Lammi MR, Aiello B, Burg GT et al (2015) Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial. Chest 148:919–926CrossRef
7.
Bjerregaard MR, Hjortrup PB, Perner A (2019) Indications for fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock: post-hoc analyses of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:337–343CrossRef
8.
Glassford NJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R (2014) Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of the contemporary literature. Crit Care 18:696CrossRef
9.
Silversides JA, Major E, Ferguson AJ et al (2017) Conservative fluid management or deresuscitation for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome following the resuscitation phase of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 43:155–170CrossRef
10.
Prowle JR, Chua H-R, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R (2012) Clinical review: volume of fluid resuscitation and the incidence of acute kidney injury—a systematic review. Crit Care 16:230CrossRef
11.
Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I et al (2014) Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 46:361–380CrossRef
12.
Byrne L, Obonyo NG, Diab SD et al (2018) Unintended consequences: fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198:1043–1054CrossRef
13.
García MIM, González PG, Romero MG et al (2015) Effects of fluid administration on arterial load in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med 41:1247–1255CrossRef
14.
Ince C (2015) Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Crit Care 19:S8CrossRef
15.
Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul J-L (2016) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42:1935–1947CrossRef
16.
Miller A, Mandeville J (2016) Predicting and measuring fluid responsiveness with echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 3:G1–G12CrossRef
17.
Jacobs R, Lochy S, Malbrain MLNG (2019) Phenylephrine-induced recruitable preload from the venous side. J Clin Monit Comput 33:373–376CrossRef
18.
Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Bundgaard H et al (2016) Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial. Intensive Care Med 42:1695–1705CrossRef
19.
Russell JA, Gordon AC, Walley KR (2019) Early may be better: early low-dose norepinephrine in septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199:1049–1051CrossRef
20.
Van Regenmortel N, Verbrugghe W, Roelant E et al (2018) Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population. Intensive Care Med 44:409–417CrossRef
21.
Cordemans C, De laet I, Van Regenmortel N et al (2012) Aiming for a negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury and increased intra- abdominal pressure: a pilot study looking at the effects of PAL-treatment. Ann Intensive Care 2:S15CrossRef
22.
Martin GS, Moss M, Wheeler AP et al (2005) A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 33:1681–1687CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients
Authors
Jonathan A. Silversides
Anders Perner
Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05713-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Intensive Care Medicine 10/2019 Go to the issue

Correspondence

Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation: author’s reply

Understanding the Disease

Pulmonary complications in liver disease

Correction

Correction to: The number needed to mourn

Editorial

Focus on paediatrics

Letter

Paediatric intensive care admission blood pressure and risk of death in 30,334 children

Imaging in Intensive Care Medicine

Massive air in the heart complicating percutaneous lung biopsy