Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Published in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Epilepsy (C W Bazil, Section Editor)

Seizure detection: do current devices work? And when can they be useful?

Authors: Xiuhe Zhao, Samden D. Lhatoo

Published in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The unpredictability and apparent randomness of epileptic seizures is one of the most vexing aspects of epilepsy. Methods or devices capable of detecting seizures may help prevent injury or even death and significantly improve quality of life. Here, we summarize and evaluate currently available, unimodal, or polymodal detection systems for epileptic seizures, mainly in the ambulatory setting.

Recent Findings

There are two broad categories of detection devices: EEG-based and non-EEG-based systems. Wireless wearable EEG devices are now available both in research and commercial arenas. Neuro-stimulation devices are currently evolving and initial experiences of these show potential promise. As for non-EEG devices, different detecting systems show different sensitivity according to the different patient and seizure types. Regardless, when used in combination, these modalities may complement each other to increase positive predictive value.

Summary

Although some devices with high sensitivity are promising, practical widespread use of such detection systems is still some way away. More research and experience are needed to evaluate the most efficient and integrated systems, to allow for better approaches to detection and prediction of seizures. The concept of closed-loop systems and prompt intervention may substantially improve quality of life for patients and carers.
Literature
1.
2.
Fiest KM, Sauro KM, Wiebe S, Patten SB, Kwon CS, Dykeman J, et al. The prevalence and incidence of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. Neurology. 2017;88(3):296–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Morrell MJ. Antiepileptic medications for the treatment of epilepsy. Semin Neurol. 2002;22(3):247–58.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(5):311–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Jacoby A. Epilepsy and the quality of everyday life. Findings from a study of people with well-controlled epilepsy. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(6):657–66.PubMedCrossRef
9.
van Andel J, Thijs RD, de Weerd A, Arends J, Leijten F. Non-EEG based ambulatory seizure detection designed for home use: what is available and how will it influence epilepsy care? Epilepsy Behav. 2016;57(Pt A):82–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Christensen J, Pedersen CB, Sidenius P, Olsen J, Vestergaard M. Long-term mortality in children and young adults with epilepsy—a population-based cohort study. Epilepsy Res. 2015;114:81–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Bell GS, Sinha S, Tisi JD, Stephani C, Scott CA, Harkness WF, et al. Premature mortality in refractory partial epilepsy: does surgical treatment make a difference? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(7):716–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Holst AG, Winkel BG, Risgaard B, Nielsen JB, Rasmussen PV, Haunsø S, et al. Epilepsy and risk of death and sudden unexpected death in the young: a nationwide study. Epilepsia. 2013;54(9):1613–20.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Nashef L, Fish DR, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Incidence of sudden unexpected death in an adult outpatient cohort with epilepsy at a tertiary referral center. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(4):462–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Sillanpaa M, Shinnar S. SUDEP and other causes of mortality in childhoodonset epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;28(2):249–55.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Bidwell J, Khuwatsamrit T, Askew B, Ehrenberg JA, Helmers S. Seizure reporting technologies for epilepsy treatment: a review of clinical information needs and supporting technologies. Seizure. 2015;32:109–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Blum DE, Eskola J, Bortz JJ, Fisher RS. Patient awareness of seizures. Neurology. 1996;47(1):260–4.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Hoppe C, Poepel A, Elger CE. Epilepsy: accuracy of patient seizure counts. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(11):1595–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Kerling F, Mueller S, Pauli E, Stefan H. When do patients forget their seizures?An electroclinical study. Epilepsy Behav. 2006;9(2):281–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Detyniecki K, Blumenfeld H. Consciousness of seizures and consciousness during seizures: are they related? Epilepsy Behav. 2014;30:6–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Fisher RS, Blum DE, DiVentura B, Vannest J, Hixson JD, Moss R, et al. Seizure diaries for clinical research and practice: limitations and future prospects. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(3):304–10.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Rugg-Gunn FJ, Harrison NA, Duncan JS. Evaluation of the accuracy of seizure descriptions by the relatives of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2001;43(3):193–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide: valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):790–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy: initial monotherapy outcomes at 12 months. Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):141–55.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Nijsen TM, Arends JB, Griep PA, Cluitmans PJ. The potential value of threedimensional accelerometry for detection of motor seizures in severe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;7(1):74–84.PubMedCrossRef
26.
•• Ulate-Campos A, Coughlin F, Gaínza-Lein M, Fernández IS, Pearl PL, Loddenkemper T. Automated seizure detection systems and their effectiveness for each type of seizure. Seizure. 2016;40:88–101. This review evaluates seizure detection devices and their effectiveness for different seizure types. PubMedCrossRef
27.
• Ramgopal S, Thome-Souza S, Jackson M, Kadish NE, Sánchez Fernández I, Klehm J, et al. Seizure detection, seizure prediction, and closed-loop warning systems in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:291–307. This paper presents an overview of seizure detection and related prediction methods and discusses the potential use in closed-loop systems in epilepsy. PubMedCrossRef
28.
Bialer M, Johannessen SI, Levy RH, Perucca E, Tomson T, White HS, et al. Seizure detection and neuromodulation: a summary of data presented at the XIII conference on new antiepileptic drug and devices (EILAT XIII). Epilepsy Res. 2017;130:27–36.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Gotman J. Automatic recognition of epileptic seizures in the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;54(5):530–40.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Qu H, Gotman J. A patient-specific algorithm for the detection of seizure onset in long-term EEG monitoring: possible use as a warning device. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(2):115–22.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Qu H, Gotman J. Improvement in seizure detection performance by automatic adaptation to the EEG of each patient. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;86(2):79–87.PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
Murro AM, King DW, Smith JR, Gallagher BB, Flanigin HF, Meador K. Computerized seizure detection of complex partial seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;79(4):330–3.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Harding GW. An automated seizure monitoring system for patients with indwelling recording electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;86(6):428–37.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Osorio I, Frei MG, Wilkinson SB. Real-time automated detection and quantitative analysis of seizures and short-term prediction of clinical onset. Epilepsia. 1998;39(6):615–27.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Osorio I, Frei MG, Giftakis J, Peters T, Ingram J, Turnbull M, et al. Performance reassessment of a real-time seizure-detection algorithm on long ECoG series. Epilepsia. 2002;43(12):1522–35.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Schulze-Bonhage A, Sales F, Wagner K, Teotonio R, Carius A, Schelle A, et al. Views of patients with epilepsy on seizure prediction devices. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;18(4):388–96.PubMedCrossRef
38.
•• Luan B, Sun M. A simulation study on a single-unit wireless EEG sensor. Proc IEEE Annu Northeast Bioeng Conf. 2015; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​NEBEC.​2015.​7117176. Using a novel device named single-unit wireless EEG sensor, this study demonstrates that it can acquire EEG reliably and the selection of sensor orientation should be an important factor to influence signal strength, thus warranting the further design and construction of a single-unit wireless EEG sensor.
39.
Luan B, Jia W, Thirumala PD, Balzer J, Gao D, Sun M. A feasibility study on a single-unit wireless EEG sensor. Int Conf Signal Process Proc. 2014;2014:2282–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
•• Wyckoff SN, Sherlin LH, Ford NL, Dalke D. Validation of a wireless dry electrode system for electroencephalography. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12(1):95. This report demonstrates that EEG data recorded from the wireless dry electrode system is comparable to data recorded from a conventional system. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
• Do Valle BG, Cash SS, Sodini CG. Wireless behind-the-ear EEG recording device with wireless interface to a mobile device (iPhone/iPod touch). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5952–5. This paper presents a novel behind-the-ear EEG recording device that uses an iPhone or iPod Touch to continuously upload the patient’s data to a secure server.
42.
Mihajlovic V, Grundlehner B, Vullers R, Penders J. Wearable, wireless EEG solutions in daily life applications: what are we missing? IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19(1):6–21.PubMedCrossRef
43.
•• Grant AC, Abdel-Baki SG, Omurtag A, Sinert R, Chari G, Malhotra S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of microEEG: a miniature, wireless EEG device. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;34:81–5. This study finds that the diagnosis accuracy of microEEG was comparable to that of the reference system. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
•• Kjaer TW, Sorensen HBD, Groenborg S, Pedersen CR, Duun-Henriksen J. Detection of paroxysms in long-term, single-channel EEG-monitoring of patients with typical absence seizures. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2017;5:2000108. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​JTEHM.​2017.​2649491. This study suggested that portable EEG-recorders identifying paroxystic events in epilepsy outpatients are a promising tool for patients and physicians dealing with absence epilepsy. PubMedCrossRef
45.
• Cook MJ, O'Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, Murphy M, Morokoff A, Fabinyi G, et al. Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(6):563–71. This study showed that intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring is feasible in ambulatory patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. PubMedCrossRef
46.
Thomas GP, Jobst BC. Critical review of the responsive neurostimulator system for epilepsy. Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:405–11.
47.
Lee B, Zubair MN, Marquez YD, Lee DM, Kalayjian LA, Heck CN, et al. A single-center experience with the NeuroPace RNS system: a review of techniques and potential problems. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(3):719–26.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Grummett TS, Leibbrandt RE, Lewis TW, DeLosAngeles D, Powers DM, Willoughby JO, et al. Measurement of neural signals from inexpensive: wireless and dry EEG systems. Physiol Meas. 2015;36(7):1469–84.PubMedCrossRef
49.
David Hairston W, Whitaker KW, Ries AJ, Vettel JM, Cortney Bradford J, Kerick SE, et al. Usability of four commercially-oriented EEG systems. J Neural Eng. 2014;11(4):046018.PubMedCrossRef
50.
• Jakab A, Kulkas A, Salpavaara T, Kauppinen P, Verho J, Heikkila H, et al. Novel wireless electroencephalography system with a minimal preparation time for use in emergencies and prehospital care. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:60. This study finds that the emEEG system may be used to record high-quality EEG data in emergency medicine and during ambulance transportation. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
52.
53.
54.
•• Fürbass F, Ossenblok P, Hartmann M, Perko H, Skupch AM, Lindinger G, et al. Prospective multi-center study of an automatic online seizure detection system for epilepsy monitoring units. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(6):1124–31. This study finds the automatic seizure detection method EpiScan showed high sensitivity and low false alarm rate in a prospective multi-center study on a large number of patients. PubMedCrossRef
55.
56.
Looney D, Kidmose P, Park C, Ungstrup M, Rank M, Rosenkranz K, et al. The in-the-ear recording concept: user-centered and wearable brain monitoring. IEEE Pulse. 2012;3(6):32–42.PubMedCrossRef
57.
•• Zibrandtsen IC, Kidmose P, Christensen CB, Kjaer TW. Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy—a comparison with scalp EEG monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(12):2454–61. These results suggest that ear-EEG can reliably detect electroencephalographic patterns associated with focal temporal lobe seizures. PubMedCrossRef
58.
•• Gu Y, Cleeren E, Dan J, Claes K, Van Paesschen W, Van Huffel S, et al. Comparison between scalp EEG and behind-the-ear eeg for development of a wearable seizure detection system for patients with focal epilepsy. Sensors (Basel). 2017;18(1):28, https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​s18010029. This study finds the behind-the-ear EEG had a median sensitivity of 94.5% and a false detection rate of 0.52 per hour for patients with focal epilepsy.
59.
•• Bleichner MG, Debener S. Concealed, Unobtrusive ear-centered eeg acquisition: cEEGrids for transparent EEG. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:163. The authors found that the cEEGrid enables the recording of meaningful continuous EEG, event-related potentials, and neural oscillations. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Wilder P, Herbert J. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. Little, Brown: Boston; 1954.
61.
•• Dalkilic EB. Neurostimulation devices used in treatment of epilepsy. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017;19(2):7. This review contributes to the foundation for new research to expand on current knowledge and practice by reviewing the current status of the literature about different types of neurostimulation devices. PubMedCrossRef
62.
Rolston JD, Englot DJ, Wang DD, Shih T, Chang EF. Comparison of seizure control outcomes and the safety of vagus nerve, thalamic deep brain, and responsive neurostimulation: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32(3):E14.PubMedCrossRef
63.
• Morrell MJ. Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011;77(13):1295–304. This study provides class I evidence that responsive cortical stimulation is effective in significantly reducing seizure frequency for 12 weeks in adults. PubMedCrossRef
64.
•• Bergey GK, Morrell MJ, Mizrahi EM, Goldman A, King-Stephens D, Nair D, et al. Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures. Neurology. 2015;84(8):810–7. This study provides class IV evidence that for adults with medically refractory partial onset seizures, responsive direct cortical stimulation reduces seizures and improves quality of life over a mean follow-up of 5.4 years. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
• Meador KJ, Kapur R, Loring DW, Kanner AM, Morrell MJ, RNS® System Pivotal Trial Investigators. Quality of life and mood in patients with medically intractable epilepsy treated with targeted responsive neurostimulation. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:242–7. This study finds that treatment with targeted responsive neurostimulation does not adversely affect QOL or mood and may be associated with improvements in QOL in patients, including those with seizures of either mesial temporal origin or neocortical origin. PubMedCrossRef
66.
•• Geller EB, Skarpaas TL, Gross RE, Goodman RR, Barkley GL, Bazil CW, et al. Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2017;58(6):994–1004. The authors suggests that brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior MTL resection. PubMedCrossRef
67.
•• Jobst BC, Kapur R, Barkley GL, Bazil CW, Berg MJ, Bergey GK, et al. Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas. Epilepsia. 2017;58(6):1005–14. This study suggests that brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including adults with seizures of neocortical onset, and those with onsets from eloquent cortex. PubMedCrossRef
68.
• Heck CN, King-Stephens D, Massey AD, Nair DR, Jobst BC, Barkley GL, et al. Two-year seizure reduction in adults with medically intractable partial onset epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation: final results of the RNS System Pivotal trial. Epilepsia. 2014;55(3):432–41. This study finds that responsive stimulation to the seizure focus reduced the frequency of partial-onset seizures acutely, showed improving seizure reduction over time, was well tolerated, and was acceptably safe. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
•• Sun FT, Arcot Desai S, Tcheng TK, Morrell MJ. Changes in the electrocorticogram after implantation of intracranial electrodes in humans: the implant effect. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129(3):676–86. This study reports that ECoG spectral power and spike rates are not stable in the first 5 months after implantation, presumably due to neurophysiological and electrode-tissue interface changes. PubMedCrossRef
70.
Cooper IS, Amin I, Riklan M, Waltz JM, Poon TP. Chronic cerebellar stimulation in epilepsy. Clinical and anatomical studies. Arch Neurol. 1976;33(8):559–70.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Cooper IS, Amin I, Upton A, Riklan M, Watkins S, McLellan L. Safety and effcacy of chronic cerebellar stimulation. Appl Neurophysiol. 1977;40(2-4):124–34.PubMed
72.
Rosenow J, Das K, Rovit RL, Couldwell WT, Irving S. Cooper and his role in intracranial stimulation for movement disorders and epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2002;78(2):95-112.
73.
Van Buren JM, Wood JH, Oakley J, Hambrecht F. Preliminary evaluation of cerebellar stimulation by double-blind stimulation and biological criteria in the treatment of epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 1978;48(3):407–16.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Velasco AL, Velasco F, Velasco M, Trejo D, Castro G, Carrillo-Ruiz JD. Electrical stimulation of the hippocampal epileptic foci for seizure control: a double-blind, long-term follow-up study. Epilepsia. 2007;48(10):1895–903.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Boon P, Vonck K, De Herdt V, Van Dycke A, Goethals M, Goossens L, et al. Deep brain stimulation in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007;48(8):1551–60.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Velasco F, Velasco M, Ogarrio C, Fanghanel G. Electrical stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus in the treatment of convulsive seizures: a preliminary report. Epilepsia. 1987;28(4):421–30.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Kinoshita M, Ikeda A, Matsuhashi M, Matsumoto R, Hitomi T, Begum T, et al. Electric cortical stimulation suppresses epileptic and background activities in neocortical epilepsy and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(6):1291–9.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Kinoshita M, Ikeda A, Matsumoto R, Begum T, Usui K, Yamamoto J, et al. Electric stimulation on human cortex suppresses fast cortical activity and epileptic spikes. Epilepsia. 2004;45(7):787–91.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):899–908.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Ben-Menachem E, Revesz D, Simon BJ, Silberstein S. Surgically implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation: a review of effcacy, safety and tolerability. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(9):1260–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
Kassir R, Barthelemy JC, Roche F, Blanc P, Zufferey P, Galusca B, et al. Bariatric surgery associated with percutaneous auricular vagal stimulation: a new prospective treatment on weight loss. Int J Surg. 2015;18:55–6.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Deuschl G, Paschen S, Witt K. Clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:107–28.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Morris GL III, Gloss D, Buchhalter J, Mack KJ, Nickels K, Harden C. Evidence-based guideline update: vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;81(16):1453–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Sprengers M, Vonck K, Carrette E, Marson AG, Boon P. Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD008497.
85.
86.
Ben-Menachem E, Mañon-Espaillat R, Ristanovic R, Wilder BJ, Stefan H, Mirza W, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 1. A controlled study of effect on seizures. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia. 1994;35(3):616–26.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Michael JE, Wegener K, Barnes DW. Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable seizures: one year follow-up. J Neurosci Nurs. 1993;25(6):362–6.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Salinsky MC, Burchiel KJ. Vagus nerve stimulation has no effect on awake EEG rhythms in humans. Epilepsia. 1993;34(2):299–304.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Panebianco M, Rigby A, Weston J, Marson AG. Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD002896.
90.
The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. Neurology. 1995;45(2):224–30.CrossRef
91.
Handforth A, DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC, Uthman BM, Naritoku DK, Tecoma ES, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized active-control trial. Neurology. 1998;51(1):48–55.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Morris GL III, Mueller WM. Long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy: the Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group E01–E05. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1731–5.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Stefan H, Kreiselmeyer G, Kerling F, Kurzbuch K, Rauch C, Heers M, et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) in pharmacoresistant epilepsies: a proof of concept trial. Epilepsia. 2012;53(7):e115–8.PubMedCrossRef
94.
•• Ryvlin P, So EL, Gordon CM, Hesdorffer DC, Sperling MR, Devinsky O, et al. Long-term surveillance of SUDEP in drug-resistant epilepsy patients treated with VNS Therapy. Epilepsia. 2018;59(3):562–72. This data suggest that SUDEP risk significantly decreases during long-term follow-up of patients with refractory epilepsy receiving VNS Therapy. PubMedCrossRef
95.
Kostov K, Kostov H, Taubøll E. Long-term vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;16:321–4.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Osorio I, Schachter S. Extracerebral detection of seizures: a new era in epileptology? Epilepsy Behav. 2011;22(Suppl 1):S82–7.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Van Buren J. Some autonomic concomitants of ictal automatism: a study of temporal lobe attacks. Brain. 1958;81(4):505–39.CrossRef
98.
Wannamaker BB. Autonomic nervous system and epilepsy. Epilepsy. 1985;26(suppl 1):s31–9.CrossRef
99.
Smith PEM, Howell SJL, Owen L, Blumhardt DL. Profiles of instant heart rate during partial seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72(3):207–17.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Epstein MA, Sperling MR, O'Connor MJ. Cardiac rhythm during temporal lobe seizures. Neurology. 1992;42:50–3.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Galemberti CA, Marchiani E, Barzizza F, Manni R, Sartori I, Tartara A. Partial epileptic seizures of different origin variably affect cardiac rhythm. Epilepsia. 1996;37(8):742–7.CrossRef
102.
Vaughn BV, Quint SR, Tennison MB, Messenheiemr JA. Monitoring heart period variability changes during seizures II. Diversity and trends. J Epilepsy. 1996;9(1):27–34.CrossRef
103.
Novak V, Reeves AL, Novak P, low PA, Sharbrough FW. Time-frequency mapping of R-R intervals during complex partial seizures of temporal lobe origin. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1999;77(2-3):195–202.CrossRefPubMed
104.
Ziljmans M, Flanagan D, Gotman J. Heart rate changes and ECG abnormalities during epileptic seizures: prevalence and objective definition of an objective clinical sign. Epilepsia. 2002;43(8):847–54.CrossRef
105.
Opherk C, Coronillas J, Hirsch LJ. Heart rate and EKG changes in 102 seizures: analysis of influencing factors. Epilepsy Res. 2002;52(2):117–27.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Leutmezer F, Schernthaner C, Lurger S, Potzelberger K, Baumgartner C. Electrocardiographic changes at the onset of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 2003;44(3):348–54.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Mayer H, Benninger F, Urak L, Plattner B, Geldner J, Feucht M. EKG abnormalities in children and adolescents with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2004;63(2):324–8.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Di Gennaro G, Quarato PP, Sebastiano F, Esposito V, Onorati P, Grammaldo LG, et al. Ictal heart rate increases precede EEG discharges in drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe seizures. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(5):1169–77.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Weil S, Arnold S, Eisensehr I, Noachtar S. Heart rate increases in otherwise sublinical seizures is different in temporal versus extra-temporal seizure onset. Epileptic Disord. 2005;7(3):199–204.PubMed
110.
Jansen K, Varon C, Van Huffel S, Lagae L. Peri-ictal ECG changes in childhood epilepsy: implications for detection systems. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;29(1):72–6.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Devinsky O. Diagnosis and treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Rev Neurol Dis. 2004;1(1):2–9.PubMed
112.
Jansen K, Lagae L. Cardiac changes in epilepsy. Seizure. 2010;19(8):45–60.CrossRef
113.
• Van de Vel A, Cuppens K, Bonroy B, Milosevic M, Jansen K, Van Huffel S, et al. Non-EEG seizure detection systems and potential SUDEP prevention: state of the art: review and update. Seizure. 2016;41:141–53. This review article gives an updated overview of body signals and methods for seizure detection, international research, and (commercially) available systems and applications. PubMedCrossRef
114.
Behbahani S, Dabanloo NJ, Nasrabadi AM, Teixeira CA, Dourado A. Pre-ictal heart rate variability assessment of epileptic seizures by means of linear and non-linear analyses. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013;13(8):797–803.PubMed
115.
•• Cogan D, Nourani M, Harvey J, Nagaraddi V. Epileptic seizure detection using wristworn biosensors. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5086–9. Based on a wrist-worn device with single signal seizure detection algorithms, the authors collected 108 h of data from three EMU patients and found it can distinguish the seizures from non-seizure events with 100% accuracy. PubMed
116.
De Cooman T, Varon C, Hunyadi B, Van Paesschen W, Lagae L, Van Huffel S. Online automated seizure detection in temporal lobe epilepsy patients using single-lead ecg. Int J Neural Syst. 2017;27(7):1750022.PubMedCrossRef
117.
Masse F, van Bussel M, Serteyn A, Arends J, Penders J. Miniaturized wireless ECG monitor for real-time detection of epileptic seizures. ACM Trans Embedd Comput Syst. 2013;12(4):102. 21 pagesCrossRef
118.
Massé F, Penders J, Sereteyn A, van Bussel M, Arends J. Miniaturized wireless ECG-monitor for real-time detection of epileptic seizures. Proc Wirel Health. 2010;11:1–7.
119.
van Elmpt WJ, Nijsen TM, Griep PA, Arends JB. A model of heart rate changes to detect seizures in severe epilepsy. Seizure. 2006;15(6):366–75.PubMedCrossRef
120.
Varon C, Caicedo A, Jansen K, Lagae L, Van Huffel S. Detection of epileptic seizures from single lead ECG by means of phase rectified signal averaging. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3789–90.PubMed
121.
Becq G, Bonnet S, Minotti L, Antonakios M, Guillemaud R, Kahane P. Classification of epileptic motor manifestations using inertial and magnetic sensors. Comput Biol Med. 2011;41(1):46–55.PubMedCrossRef
122.
• Beniczky S, Polster T, Kjaer TW, Hjalgrim H. Detection of generalized tonic clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer: a prospective, multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2013;54(4):e58–61. The results suggest that the wireless wrist accelerometer sensor detects GTCS with high sensitivity and specificity. PubMedCrossRef
123.
Borujeny GT, Yazdi M, Keshavarz-Haddad A, Borujeny AR. Detection of epileptic seizure using wireless sensor networks. J Med Signals Sens. 2013;3(2):63–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
124.
Cuppens K, Karsmakers P, Van de Vel A, Bonroy B, Milosevic M, Luca S, et al. Accelerometry-based home monitoring for detection of nocturnal hypermotor seizures based on novelty detection. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014;18(3):1026–33.PubMedCrossRef
125.
Dalton A, Patel S, Chowdhury AR, Welsh M, Pang T, Schachter S, et al. Development of a body sensor network to detect motor patterns of epileptic seizures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(11):3204–11.PubMedCrossRef
126.
•• Gubbi J, Kusmakar S, Rao AS, Yan B, OBrien T, Palaniswami M. Automatic detection and classification of convulsive psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using a wearable device. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20(4):1061–72. In this study, a wearable device with accelerometer sensor is proposed as a new solution in the detection and diagnosis of PNES. A very high seizure detection rate is achieved with 100% sensitivity and few false alarms. A leave-one-out error of 6:67% is achieved in PNES classification demonstrating the usefulness of wearable device in diagnosis of PNES. PubMedCrossRef
127.
Jallon P. A Bayesian approach for epileptic seizures detection with 3D accelerometers. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:6325–8.PubMed
128.
129.
Kramer U, Kipervasser S, Shlitner A, Kuzniecky R. A novel portable seizure detection alarm system: preliminary results. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;28(1):36–8.PubMedCrossRef
130.
• Lockman J, Fisher RS, Olson DM. Detection of seizure-like movements using a wrist accelerometer. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(4):638–41. This study finds the wrist accelerometer should allow caregivers of people with tonic–clonic seizures to be alerted when a seizure occurs. PubMedCrossRef
131.
• Narechania AP, Garić II, Sen-Gupta I, Macken MP, Gerard EE, Schuele SU. Assessment of a quasi-piezoelectric mattress monitor as a detection system for generalized convulsions. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;28(2):172–6. The data suggest that the detection device has a high predictive value for generalized convulsions, offers caregivers a reliable and early warning to assist the patient during convulsions, and may be a novel way to prevent SUDEP. PubMedCrossRef
132.
Nijsen TME, Aarts RM, Arends JBAM, Cluitmans PJM. Automated detection of tonic seizures using 3-D accelerometry. IFMBE Proc. 2008;22:188–91.CrossRef
133.
Nijsen TM, Aarts RM, Cluitmans PJ, Griep PA. Time-frequency analysis of accelerometry data for detection of myoclonic seizures. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010;14(5):1197–203.PubMedCrossRef
134.
Patterson AL, Mudigoudar B, Fulton S, McGregor A, Poppel KV, Wheless MC, et al. SmartWatch by SmartMonitor: assessment of seizure detection efficacy for various seizure types in children, a large prospective single-center study. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;53(4):309–11.PubMedCrossRef
135.
• Schulc E, Unterberger I, Saboor S, Hilbe J, Ertl M, Ammenwerth E, et al. Measurement and quantification of generalized tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients by means of accelerometry—an explorative study. Epilepsy Res. 2011;95(1-2):173–83. In this study, the ACM sensors recorded increased activities at the stated seizure time, which clearly differed from everyday movements. The temporary sensitivity (100%), the specificity (≥ 88%), and the positive predictive value (≥ 75%) of the detection suggest a promising alarm/false alarm ratio. PubMedCrossRef
136.
• Van de Vel A, Cuppens K, Bonroy B, Milosevic M, Van Huffel S, Vanrumste B, et al. Long-term home monitoring of hypermotor seizures by patient-worn accelerometers. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;26(1):118–25. It is the first detection system focusing on hypermotor seizures. The authors compared video/EEG-based seizure detection with ACM data in seven patients and found a sensitivity of 95.71% and a positive predictive value of 57.84%. PubMedCrossRef
137.
Van Poppel K, Fulton SP, McGregor A, Ellis M, Patters A, Wheless J. Prospective study of the Emfit movement monitor. J Child Neurol. 2013;28(11):1434–6.PubMedCrossRef
138.
•• Velez M. Fisher RS1, Bartlett V, Le S. Tracking generalized tonic-clonic seizures with a wrist accelerometer linked to an online database. Seizure. 2016;39:13–8. This study suggests that automatic detection and recording of GTCS to an online database is feasible and may be more informative than seizure logging in a paper diary. PubMedCrossRef
139.
•• Van de Vel A, Milosevic M, Bonroy B, Cuppens K, Lagae L, Vanrumste B, et al. Long-term accelerometry-triggered video monitoring and detection of tonic-clonic and clonic seizures in a home environment: pilot study. Epilepsy Behav Case Rep. 2016;5:66–71. This is the first results of long-term, wireless testing in a home environment. It gave a mean sensitivity of 66.87% and false detection rate of 1.16 per night. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
140.
•• Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Henning O, Fabricius M, Wolf P. Automated real-time detection of tonic-clonic seizures using a wearable EMG device. Neurology. 2018;90(5):e428–34. This study gives a mean sensitivity of 66.87% and false detection rate of 1.16 per night using a wearable surface EMG device. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
141.
• Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Wolf P, Jennum P, Sorensen HB. Evaluation of novel algorithm embedded in a wearable sEMG device for seizure detection. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2048–51. The device detected four of seven seizures and had a false detection rate of 0.003/h or one in 12 days using a wearable surface EMG device. PubMed
142.
Halford JJ, Sperling MR, Nair DR, Dlugos DJ, Tatum WO, Harvey J, et al. Detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures using surface electromyographic monitoring. Epilepsia. 2017;58(11):1861–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
143.
Larsen SN, Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Sorensen HB. Detection of tonic epileptic seizures based on surface electromyography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:942–5.PubMed
144.
Szabó CÁ, Morgan LC, Karkar KM, Leary LD, Lie OV, Girouard M, et al. Electromyography-based seizure detector: preliminary results comparing a generalized tonic-clonic seizure detection algorithm to video-EEG recordings. Epilepsia. 2015;56(9):1432–7.PubMedCrossRef
145.
• Fulton S, Poppel KV, McGregor A, Ellis M, Patters A, Wheless J. Prospective study of 2 bed alarms for detection of nocturnal seizures. J Child Neurol. 2012;28(11):1430–3. Using a MP5 alarm, the authors detected 1 of 15 in sleeping patients: a generalized tonic–clonic seizure, suggesting the Medpage seizure alarms do not appear to adequately detect nocturnal seizures. PubMedCrossRef
146.
Carlson C, Arnedo V, Cahill M, Devinsky O. Detecting nocturnal convulsions: efficacy of the MP5 monitor. Seizure. 2009;18(3):225–7.PubMedCrossRef
147.
•• Jeppesen J, Beniczky S, Johansen P, Sidenius P, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A. Exploring the capability of wireless near infrared spectroscopy as a portable seizure detection device for epilepsy patients. Seizure. 2015;26:43–8. This study suggests that NIRS does not seem to be a suitable technology for generic seizure detection given the device, settings, and methods used in this study. PubMedCrossRef
148.
•• Heldberg BE, Kautz T, Leutheuser H, Hopfengartner R, Kasper BS, Eskofier BM. Using wearable sensors for semiology-independent seizure detection—towards ambulatory monitoring of epilepsy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5593–6. In this study, EDA and ACC from eight patients were analyzed and an overall sensitivity of 89.1% and an overall specificity of 93.1% were achieved; for seizures without motor activity, the sensitivity was 97.1% and the specificity was 92.9%. PubMed
149.
Poh MZ, Loddenkemper T, Reinsberger C, Swenson NC, Goyal S, Sabtala MC, et al. Convulsive seizure detection using a wrist-worn electrodermal activity and accelerometry biosensor. Epilepsia. 2012;53(5):e93–7.PubMedCrossRef
150.
Sabesan S, Sankar R. Improving long-term management of epilepsy using a wearable multimodal seizure detection system. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;46:56–7.CrossRef
151.
van Andel J, Ungureanu C, Petkov G, Kalitzin S, Gutter T, de Weerd A, et al. Multimodal, automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures at home: is a reliable seizure detector feasible? Unpublished results
152.
•• Milosevic M, Van de Vel A, Bonroy B, Ceulemans B, Lagae L, Vanrumste B, et al. Automated detection of tonic-clonic seizures using 3-D accelerometry and surface electromyography in pediatric patients. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20(5):1333–41. This study demonstrates that a multimodal approach resulted in a more robust detection of short and non-stereotypical seizures (91%), while the number of false alarms increased significantly compared with the use of single sEMG modality (0.28 to 0.5/12 h). PubMedCrossRef
153.
Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Wolf P, Kjaer TW, Sams T, Sorensen HB. Automatic multi-modal intelligent seizure acquisition (MISA) system for detection of motor seizures from electromyographic data and motion data. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2012;107(2):97–110.CrossRef
154.
Fürbass F, Kampusch S, Kaniusas E, Koren J, Pirker S, Hopfengärtner R, et al. Automatic multimodal detection for long-term seizure documentation in epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(8):1466–72.PubMedCrossRef
155.
•• Fujiwara K, Miyajima M, Yamakawa T, Abe E, Suzuki Y, Sawada Y, et al. Epileptic seizure prediction based on multivariate statistical process control of heart rate variability features. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63(6):1321–32. This work proposed a new HRV-based epileptic seizure prediction method, and the possibility of realizing an HRV-based epileptic seizure prediction system was shown. PubMedCrossRef
156.
•• Jeppesen J, Beniczky S, Fuglsang Frederiksen A, Sidenius P, Johansen P. Modified automatic R-peak detection algorithm for patients with epilepsy using a portable electrocardiogram recorder. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017;2017:4082–5. The novel R-peak detection algorithm designed to avoid jitter has very high sensitivity and specificity and thus is a suitable tool for a robust, fast, real-time HRV-analysis in patients with epilepsy, creating the possibility for real-time seizure detection for these patients. PubMed
157.
•• van Andel J, Ungureanu C, Aarts R, Leijten F, Arends J. Using photoplethy- smography in heart rate monitoring of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:142–5. This study indicates that the optical heart rate sensor may fill the gap of systems for ambulatory heart rate monitoring and can be especially useful in the context of seizure detection in patients with epilepsy. PubMedCrossRef
158.
•• Vandecasteele K, De Cooman T, Gu Y, Cleeren E, Claes K, Paesschen WV, et al. Automated epileptic seizure detection based on wearable ECG and PPG in a Hospital environment. Sensors (Basel). 2017;17(10), https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​s17102338. In this study, whereas seizure detection performance using the wrist-worn PPG device was considerably lower, the performance using the wearable ECG is proven to be similar to that of the hospital ECG.
159.
Nijsen TM, Aarts RM, Arends JB, Cluitmans PJ. Model for arm movements during myoclonic seizures. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:1582–5.PubMed
160.
Van de Vel A, Verhaert K, Ceulemans B. Critical evaluation of four different seizure detection systems tested on one patient with focal and generalized tonic and clonic seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:91–4.PubMedCrossRef
161.
Jory C, Shankar R, Coker D, McLean B, Hanna J, Newman C. Safe and sound? A systematic literature review of seizure detection methods for personal use. Seizure. 2016;36:4–15.PubMedCrossRef
162.
• Kusmakar S, Muthuganapathy R, Yan B, O'Brien TJ, Palaniswami M. Gaussian mixture model for the identification of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures using a wearable accelerometer sensor. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:1006–9. This research presents an algorithm based on Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for the identification of PNES, ES, and normal movements using a wrist-worn accelerometer device. The new algorithm was tested on data collected from 16 patients and showed an overall detection accuracy of 91% with 25 false alarms. PubMed
163.
Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Hoppe K, Wolf P, Sorensen HB. Automated algorithm for generalized tonic-clonic epileptic seizure onset detection based on sEMG zero-crossing rate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(2):579–85.PubMedCrossRef
164.
Conradsen I, Wolf P, Sams T, Sorensen HB, Beniczky S. Patterns of muscle activation during generalized tonic and tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. Epilepsia. 2011;52(11):2125–32.PubMedCrossRef
165.
• Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Moldovan M, Jennum P, Fabricius M, Benedek K, et al. Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures. Epilepsia. 2014;55(7):1128–34. This study supports that surface EMG features can accurately distinguish convulsive epileptic from non-epileptic psychogenic seizures, even in PNES cases without rhythmic clonic movements. PubMedCrossRef
166.
•• Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Moldovan M, Jennum P, Fabricius M, Benedek K, et al. Automated differentiation between epileptic and non-epileptic convulsive seizures. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(2):348–51. This automated algorithm is useful for distinguishing between epileptic and psychogenic convulsive seizures. PubMedCrossRef
167.
Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Pressler R, Wolf P. Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography: biomarkers for convulsive seizures. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(8):2900–7.PubMedCrossRef
168.
Poh MZ, Loddenkemper T, Swenson NC, Goyal S, Madsen JR, Picard RW. Continuous monitoring of electrodermal activity during epileptic seizures using a wearable sensor. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:4415–8.PubMed
169.
Poh MZ, Loddenkemper T, Reinsberger C, Swenson NC, Goyal S, Madsen JR, et al. Autonomic changes with seizures correlate with postictal EEG suppression. Neurology. 2012;78(23):1868–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
170.
Sarkis RA, Thome-Souza S, Poh MZ, Llewellyn N, Klehm J, Madsen JR, et al. Autonomic changes following generalized tonic clonic seizures: an analysis of adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2015;115:113–8.PubMedCrossRef
171.
•• Picard RW, Migliorini M, Caborni C, Onorati F, Regalia G, Friedman D, et al. Wrist sensor reveals sympathetic hyperactivity and hypoventilation before probable SUDEP. Neurology. 2017;89(6):633–5. They report a probable SUDEP in a 20-year-old man wearing a smartwatch that recorded wrist motion via three-axis accelerometer (ACC) and electrodermal activity (EDA). PubMedCrossRef
172.
Nickels KC, Grossardt BR, Wirrell EC. Epilepsy-related mortality is low in children: a 30-year population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Epilepsia. 2012;53(12):2164–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
173.
Rémi J, Silva Cunha JP, Vollmar C, Topcuoglu ÖB, Meier A, Ulowetz S, et al. Quantitative movement analysis differentiates focal seizures characterized by automatisms. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(4):642–7.PubMedCrossRef
174.
Pediaditis M, Tsiknakis M, Leitgeb N. Vision-based motion detection: analysis and recognition of epileptic seizures—a systematic review. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2012;108(3):1133–48.CrossRef
175.
Lu H, Pan Y, Mandal B, Eng HL, Guan C, Chan DW. Quantifying limb movements in epileptic seizures through color-based video analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(2):461–9.PubMedCrossRef
176.
Cuppens K, Chen CW, Wong KB, Van de Vel A, Lagae L, Ceulemans B, et al. Using spatio-temporal interest points (STIP) for myoclonic jerk detection in nocturnal video. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4454–7.PubMed
177.
Kalitzin S, Petkov G, Velis D, Vledder B, Lopes da Silva F. Automatic segmentation of episodes containing epileptic clonic seizures in video sequences. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(12):3379–85.PubMedCrossRef
178.
Mandal B, Eng HL, Lu H, Chan DW, Ng YL. Non-intrusive head movement analysis of videotaped seizures of epileptic origin. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:6060–3.PubMed
179.
van der Lende M, Cox FM, Visser GH, Sander JW, Thijs RD. Value of video monitoring for nocturnal seizure detection in a residential setting. Epilepsia. 2016;57(11):1748–53.PubMedCrossRef
180.
Shankar R, Jory C, Tripp M, Cox D. Monitoring nocturnal seizure in vulnerable patients. Learn Disabil Pract. 2013;16(9):36–8.CrossRef
181.
Garbey M, Sun N, Merla A, Pavlidis I. Contact-free measurement of cardiac pulse based on the analysis of thermal imagery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(8):1418–26.PubMedCrossRef
182.
Murthy JN, van Jaarsveld J, Fei J, Pavlidis I, Harrykissoon RI, Lucke JF, et al. Thermal infrared imaging: a novel method to monitor airflow during polysomnography. Sleep. 2009;32(11):1521–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
183.
Lamberts RJ, Thijs RD, Laffan A, Langan Y, Sander JW. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: people with nocturnal seizures may be at highest risk. Epilepsia. 2012;53(2):253–7.PubMedCrossRef
184.
185.
Seyal M. Frontal hemodynamic changes precede EEG onset of temporal lobe seizures. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(3):442–8.PubMedCrossRef
186.
Roche-Labarbe N, Zaaimi B, Berquin P, Nehlig A, Grebe R, Wallois F. NIRS measured oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin changes associated with EEG spikeand-wave discharges in children. Epilepsia. 2008;49(11):1871–80.PubMedCrossRef
187.
• Lareau E, Lesage F, Pouliot P, Nguyen D, Le Lan J, Sawan M. Multichannel wearable system dedicated for simultaneous electroencephalography∕near-infrared spectroscopy real-time data acquisitions. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(9):096014. Using a multichannel system (a battery-powered, portable system with potentially up to 32 EEG channels, 32 NIRS light sources, and 32 detectors), this study finds good concordance with literature regarding functional activations and suggests sufficient performance for clinical use, provided that some minor adjustments were made. PubMedCrossRef
188.
•• Kassab A, Le Lan J, Tremblay J, Vannasing P, Dehbozorgi M, Pouliot P, et al. Multichannel wearable fNIRS-EEG system for long-term clinical monitoring. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(1):7–23. This is the first demonstration of a wearable wireless multichannel fNIRS-EEG monitoring system in patients with neurological conditions. Data analysis confirmed expected hemodynamic variations during validation recordings and useful clinical information during in-hospital testing. PubMedCrossRef
189.
•• Rodriguez-Villegas E, Chen G, Radcliffe J, Duncan J. A pilot study of a wearable apnea detection device. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e005299. The authors find that the performance of the novel apnea detection device compares very well to the scoring by an experienced clinician even in the presence of breathing artefacts, in this small pilot study. This can potentially make it a real solution for apnea home monitoring. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
190.
•• El Tahry R, Hirsch M, Van Rijckevorsel K, Santos SF, de Tourtchaninoff M, Rooijakkers H, et al. Early experiences with tachycardia-triggered vagus nerve stimulation using the AspireSR stimulator. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18(2):155–62. The authors report their experience with three patients in assessing the functionality of ictal stimulation, illustrating the detection system in practice. Detection of ictal tachycardia and variable additional detections of physiological tachycardia depended on the individual seizure-detecting algorithm settings. PubMed
191.
Hampel KG, Vatter H, Elger CE, Surges R. Cardiac-based vagus nerve stimulation reduced seizure duration in a patient with refractory epilepsy. Seizure. 2015;26:81–5.PubMedCrossRef
192.
•• Ravan M. Investigating the correlation between short-term effectiveness of VNS Therapy in reducing the severity of seizures and long-term responsiveness. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:46–53. This study shows that automatic delivery of VNS Therapy reduces ictal spatial synchronization (EEG-based quantitative feature) in patients who responded (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency) to VNS Therapy. This feature may be used as potential biomarker for predicting long-term response to VNS therapy. PubMedCrossRef
193.
194.
Binks AP, Banzett RB, Duvivier C. An inexpensive, MRI compatible device to measure tidal volume from chest-wall circumference. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(2):149–59.PubMedCrossRef
195.
•• Cogan D, Birjandtalab J, Nourani M, Harvey J, Nagaraddi V. Multi-biosignal analysis for epileptic seizure monitoring. Int J Neural Syst. 2017;27(1):1650031. This study developed a three-stage seizure detection methodology based on 339 h of data (26 seizures) collected from 10 patients in an epilepsy monitoring unit, so to develop a wearable system that will detect seizures, alert a caregiver, and record the time of seizure in an electronic diary for the patient’s physician. PubMedCrossRef
196.
•• Onorati F, Regalia G, Caborni C, Migliorini M, Bender D, Poh MZ, et al. Multicenter clinical assessment of improved wearable multimodal convulsive seizure detectors. Epilepsia. 2017;58(11):1870–9. The proposed multimodal wrist-worn convulsive seizure detectors provide seizure counts that are more accurate than previous automated detectors and typical patient self-reports, while maintaining a tolerable FAR for ambulatory monitoring. PubMedCrossRef
197.
Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Wolf P, Terney D, Sams T, Sorensen HB. Multi-modal intelligent seizure acquisition (MISA) system—a new approach towards seizure detection based on full body motion measures. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:2591–5.PubMed
198.
Conradsen I, Beniczky S, Wolf P, Henriksen J, Sams T, Sorensen HB. Seizure onset detection based on a uni- or multi-modal intelligent seizure acquisition (UISA/MISA) system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3269–72.PubMed
199.
Devinsky O, Hesdorffer DC, Thurman DJ, Lhatoo S, Richerson G. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1075–88.PubMedCrossRef
200.
Ryvlin P, Nashef L, Lhatoo SD, Bateman LM, Bird J, Bleasel A, et al. Incidence and mechanisms of cardiorespiratory arrests in epilepsy monitoring units (MORTEMUS): a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(10):966–77.PubMedCrossRef
201.
Seyal M, Bateman LM, Li C-S. Impact of periictal interventions on respiratory dysfunction, postictal EEG suppression, and postictal immobility. Epilepsia. 2013;54:377–82.PubMedCrossRef
202.
Kuo J, Zhao W, Li CS, Kennedy JD, Seyal M. Postictal immobility and generalized EEG suppression are associated with the severity of respiratory dysfunction. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):412–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
203.
Azar NJ, Tayah TF, Wang L, Song Y, Abou-Khalil BW. Postictal breathing pattern distinguishes epileptic from nonepileptic convulsive seizures. Epilepsia. 2008;49(1):132–7.PubMedCrossRef
204.
Rugg-Gunn F, Duncan J, Hjalgrim H, Seyal M, Bateman L. From unwitnessed fatality to witnessed rescue: nonpharmacologic interventions in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016;57(Suppl 1:26–34.CrossRef
205.
Tomson T, Surges R, Delamont R, Haywood S, Hesdorffer DC. Who to target in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy prevention and how? Risk factors, biomarkers, and intervention study designs. Epilepsia. 2016;57(suppl 1):4–16.PubMedCrossRef
206.
Brown S, Hanna J, Hirst J, Hughes E, Kerr M, Leach JP, et al. Statement of research need: the epilepsy deaths register: making every epilepsy death count. Available at: sudep.​org/ statement research-need. Accessed June 1, 2017.
207.
Van de Vel A, Smets K, Wouters K, Ceulemans B. Automated non-EEG based seizure detection: do users have a say? Epilepsy Behav. 2016;62:121–8.PubMedCrossRef
208.
Patel AD, Moss R, Rust SW, Patterson J, Strouse R, Gedela S, et al. Patient-centered design criteria for wearable seizure detection devices. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64(Pt A):116–21.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Seizure detection: do current devices work? And when can they be useful?
Authors
Xiuhe Zhao
Samden D. Lhatoo
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1528-4042
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6293
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0849-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 7/2018 Go to the issue

Sleep (M Thorpy and M Billiard, Section Editors)

Narcolepsy Associated with Pandemrix Vaccine

Sleep (M Thorpy and M Billiard, Section Editors)

The Sleep Disorder in Anti-lgLON5 Disease

Headache (R Halker, Section Editor)

Women and Migraine: the Role of Hormones

Sleep (M Thorpy and M Billiard, Section Editors)

Sleep in Children with Congenital Malformations of the Central Nervous System

Behavior (H S Kirshner, Section Editor)

Thalamic Lesions and Aphasia or Neglect

Demyelinating Disorders (J Bernard and M Cameron, Section Editors)

Behçet’s Syndrome and Nervous System Involvement