Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research article

A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section

Authors: Eun Hee Chun, Sooyoung Cho, Jae Hee Woo, Youn Jin Kim

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) can be performed with either a single-space technique or a double-space technique for cesarean section. We performed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on sensory block level and side effects.

Methods

Parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 20) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 20). In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1–2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3–4 interspace. In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3–4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique.

Results

There were no differences in time to readiness or intraoperative level of sensory block between the two groups. The postoperative sensory level was maintained at a higher level in the double group than in the single group (1 h postoperatively, P = 0.029; 6 h postoperatively, P = 0.016). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. The parturient satisfaction scores 48 h postoperatively were significantly different between groups (9.5 in the double group vs. 8 in the single group, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

We conclude that there were no differences in intraoperative variables between the double-space technique and the single-space technique for CSEA. However, double-space CSEA for cesarean section may be beneficial for controlling postoperative pain and improving parturient satisfaction.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered at https://​cris.​nih.​go.​kr under the trial ID KCT0002514. Date of registration: October 27, 2017.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brownridge P. Epidural and subarachnoid analgesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:70.CrossRef Brownridge P. Epidural and subarachnoid analgesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:70.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coates MB, Mumtaz MH, Daz M, Kuz M. Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniques. Anaesthesia. 1982;37:89.CrossRef Coates MB, Mumtaz MH, Daz M, Kuz M. Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniques. Anaesthesia. 1982;37:89.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blanshard HJ, Cook TM, Blanshard HJ, Cook TM, Blanshard HJ, Cook TM. Use of combined spinal-epidural by obstetric anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:922.CrossRef Blanshard HJ, Cook TM, Blanshard HJ, Cook TM, Blanshard HJ, Cook TM. Use of combined spinal-epidural by obstetric anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:922.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Backe S, Sheikh Z, Wilson R, Lyons G. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia: needle-through-needle or separate spaces? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:854–7.CrossRef Backe S, Sheikh Z, Wilson R, Lyons G. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia: needle-through-needle or separate spaces? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:854–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sadashivaiah J, Wilson R, McLure H, Lyons G. Double-space combined spinal-epidural technique for elective caesarean section: a review of 10 years' experience in a UK teaching maternity unit. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:183–7.CrossRef Sadashivaiah J, Wilson R, McLure H, Lyons G. Double-space combined spinal-epidural technique for elective caesarean section: a review of 10 years' experience in a UK teaching maternity unit. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:183–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cook T. 201 combined spinal–epidurals for anaesthesia using a separate needle technique. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:679–83.PubMed Cook T. 201 combined spinal–epidurals for anaesthesia using a separate needle technique. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:679–83.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Casati A, D'ambrosio A, De Negri P, Fanelli G. A clinical comparison between needle-through-needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:390–4.CrossRef Casati A, D'ambrosio A, De Negri P, Fanelli G. A clinical comparison between needle-through-needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:390–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ithnin F, Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo CE. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:577–80.CrossRef Ithnin F, Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo CE. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:577–80.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lyons G, Macdonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:199–201.CrossRef Lyons G, Macdonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:199–201.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McNaught AF, Stocks GM. Epidural volume extension and low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural blockade: two ways to reduce spinal dose requirement for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:346–53.CrossRef McNaught AF, Stocks GM. Epidural volume extension and low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural blockade: two ways to reduce spinal dose requirement for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:346–53.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tyagi A, Girota G, Kumar A, Kumar S, Sethi AK, Mohta K. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:231–6.CrossRef Tyagi A, Girota G, Kumar A, Kumar S, Sethi AK, Mohta K. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:231–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morgan P, Lo J, Halpern S. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999;8:165–70.CrossRef Morgan P, Lo J, Halpern S. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999;8:165–70.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sindhvananda W, Leelanukrom R, Rodanant O, Sriprajittichai P. Maternal satisfaction to epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thail. 2004;87:628–35. Sindhvananda W, Leelanukrom R, Rodanant O, Sriprajittichai P. Maternal satisfaction to epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thail. 2004;87:628–35.
14.
go back to reference Tan DJA, Sultana R, Han NLR, Sia ATH, Sng BL. Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18:50.CrossRef Tan DJA, Sultana R, Han NLR, Sia ATH, Sng BL. Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18:50.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Robinson PN, Salmon P, Yentis SM. Maternal satisfaction. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:32–7.CrossRef Robinson PN, Salmon P, Yentis SM. Maternal satisfaction. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:32–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Richardson MG, Lopez BM, Baysinger CL, Shotwell MS, Chestnut DH. Nitrous oxide during labor: maternal satisfaction does not depend exclusively on analgesic effectiveness. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:548–53.CrossRef Richardson MG, Lopez BM, Baysinger CL, Shotwell MS, Chestnut DH. Nitrous oxide during labor: maternal satisfaction does not depend exclusively on analgesic effectiveness. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:548–53.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rawal N, Van Zundert A, Holmström B, Crowhurst JA. Combined spinal-epidural technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1997;22:406–23.CrossRef Rawal N, Van Zundert A, Holmström B, Crowhurst JA. Combined spinal-epidural technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1997;22:406–23.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:539–51.CrossRef McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:539–51.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wrench IJ, Allison A, Galimberti A, Radley S, Wilson MJ. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary Centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:124–30.CrossRef Wrench IJ, Allison A, Galimberti A, Radley S, Wilson MJ. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary Centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:124–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section
Authors
Eun Hee Chun
Sooyoung Cho
Jae Hee Woo
Youn Jin Kim
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0948-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue