Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Research

Screening Colonoscopy in the US: Attitudes and Practices of Primary Care Physicians

Authors: Jane Zapka, ScD, Carrie N. Klabunde, PhD, Stephen Taplin, MD, MPH, Gigi Yuan, MS, David Ransohoff, MD, Sarah Kobrin, PhD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rising colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the last decade are attributable almost entirely to increased colonoscopy use. Little is known about factors driving the increase, but primary care physicians (PCPs) play a central role in CRC screening delivery.

Objective

Explore PCP attitudes toward screening colonoscopy and their associations with CRC screening practice patterns.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 2006–2007.

Participants

1,266 family physicians, general practitioners, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Main Measures

Physician-reported changes in the volume of screening tests ordered, performed or supervised in the past 3 years, attitudes toward colonoscopy, the influence of evidence and perceived norms on their recommendations, challenges to screening, and practice characteristics.

Results

The cooperation rate (excludes physicians without valid contact information) was 75%; 28% reported their volume of FOBT ordering had increased substantially or somewhat, and the majority (53%) reported their sigmoidoscopy volume decreased either substantially or somewhat. A majority (73%) reported that colonoscopy volume increased somewhat or substantially. The majority (86%) strongly agreed that colonoscopy was the best of the available CRC screening tests; 69% thought it was readily available for their patients; 59% strongly or somewhat agreed that they might be sued if they did not offer colonoscopy to their patients. All three attitudes were significantly related to substantial increases in colonoscopy ordering.

Conclusions

PCPs report greatly increased colonoscopy recommendation relative to other screening tests, and highly favorable attitudes about colonoscopy. Greater emphasis is needed on informed decision-making with patients about preferences for test options.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–41.PubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–41.PubMed
2.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2008. Report No.: AHRQ Publication 08-05124-EF-3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2008. Report No.: AHRQ Publication 08-05124-EF-3.
3.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults Aged 50-75 United States 2008. MMWR Vital Signs. 2010;59:808-12. Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults Aged 50-75 United States 2008. MMWR Vital Signs. 2010;59:808-12.
4.
go back to reference Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–7.PubMed Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U, et al. Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 2007;45:160–7.PubMedCrossRef Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U, et al. Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 2007;45:160–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marbet UA, Bauerfeind P, Brunner J, Dorta G, Valloton JJ, Delco F. Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program. Endoscopy. 2008;40:650–5.PubMedCrossRef Marbet UA, Bauerfeind P, Brunner J, Dorta G, Valloton JJ, Delco F. Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program. Endoscopy. 2008;40:650–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schenck AP, Peacock SC, Klabunde CN, Lapin P, Coan JF, Brown ML. Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:1–7.PubMedCrossRef Schenck AP, Peacock SC, Klabunde CN, Lapin P, Coan JF, Brown ML. Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:1–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101:1165–87.PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101:1165–87.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:38–57.PubMedCrossRef Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010:38–57.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Theory at a Glance. A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Bethesda, MD National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health 2005. Report No.: NIH Publication No. 05-3896. Theory at a Glance. A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. Bethesda, MD National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health 2005. Report No.: NIH Publication No. 05-3896.
11.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Breslau ES, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1195–205.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Breslau ES, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1195–205.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan G, Vernon SW. Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:8–16.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan G, Vernon SW. Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:8–16.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. 2007 update with new Internet, visual and mixed-mode guide. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. 2007 update with new Internet, visual and mixed-mode guide. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
15.
go back to reference Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behav and Human Decision Process. 1991;50:179–211.CrossRef Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behav and Human Decision Process. 1991;50:179–211.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002:67–98. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002:67–98.
17.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1611–21.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1611–21.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med. 2003;36:352–62.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med. 2003;36:352–62.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ransohoff DF. Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1685–95.PubMedCrossRef Ransohoff DF. Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1685–95.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians’ colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:509–21.PubMedCrossRef Zapka JM, Klabunde CN, Arora NK, Yuan G, Smith JL, Kobrin SC. Physicians’ colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:509–21.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wolf MS, Baker DW, Makoul G. Physician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1493–9.PubMedCrossRef Wolf MS, Baker DW, Makoul G. Physician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1493–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Canada RE, Turner B. Talking to patients about screening colonoscopy–where conversations fall short. J Fam Pract. 2007;56:E1–9.PubMed Canada RE, Turner B. Talking to patients about screening colonoscopy–where conversations fall short. J Fam Pract. 2007;56:E1–9.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:849–57. W152.PubMed Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:849–57. W152.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Deshpande SP, Deshpande SS. Factors impacting perceived threat of malpractice lawsuits by various medical specialists. Health Care Manag. 2011;30:55–65. Deshpande SP, Deshpande SS. Factors impacting perceived threat of malpractice lawsuits by various medical specialists. Health Care Manag. 2011;30:55–65.
29.
go back to reference American College of Gastroenterology. Your golden years deserve the gold standard of colon cancer screening. Straight Talk: Complete Colonoscopy is the most effective screening method for colon cancer.: American College of Gastroenterology; Available at: http://www.acg.gi.org/patients/ccrk/crcad2.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2012. American College of Gastroenterology. Your golden years deserve the gold standard of colon cancer screening. Straight Talk: Complete Colonoscopy is the most effective screening method for colon cancer.: American College of Gastroenterology; Available at: http://​www.​acg.​gi.​org/​patients/​ccrk/​crcad2.​pdf. Accessed March 14, 2012.
31.
go back to reference Cohen RA, Adams PF. use of the Internet for Health Information: United States, 2009July 2011. Report No.: NCHS Data Brief No. 66. Cohen RA, Adams PF. use of the Internet for Health Information: United States, 2009July 2011. Report No.: NCHS Data Brief No. 66.
32.
go back to reference Haas JS, Fitzmaurice G, Brawarsky P, et al. Association of regional variation in primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations with individual use of colorectal cancer screening. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4:A90.PubMed Haas JS, Fitzmaurice G, Brawarsky P, et al. Association of regional variation in primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations with individual use of colorectal cancer screening. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4:A90.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Chen X, White MC, Peipins LA, Seeff LC. Increase in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1511–6.PubMedCrossRef Chen X, White MC, Peipins LA, Seeff LC. Increase in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1511–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1296–9.PubMedCrossRef Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1296–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ. When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff. 2010;29:1734–40.CrossRef Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ. When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff. 2010;29:1734–40.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ornstein S, Nemeth LS, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ. Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: translating research into practice. Med Care. 2010;48:900–6.PubMedCrossRef Ornstein S, Nemeth LS, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ. Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: translating research into practice. Med Care. 2010;48:900–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Jimbo M, Nease DE Jr, Ruffin MT, Rana GK. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:26–36. quiz 48-9.PubMedCrossRef Jimbo M, Nease DE Jr, Ruffin MT, Rana GK. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:26–36. quiz 48-9.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nadel MR, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde CN, Smith RA, Coughlin SS, White MC. Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of US primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:833–9.PubMedCrossRef Nadel MR, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde CN, Smith RA, Coughlin SS, White MC. Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of US primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:833–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Montano D, Phillips W. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:795–800.PubMedCrossRef Montano D, Phillips W. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:795–800.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Yeazel MW. Lindstrom Bremer KM, Center BA. A validated tool for gaining insight into clinicians’ preventive medicine behaviors and beliefs: the preventive medicine attitudes and activities questionnaire (PMAAQ). Prev Med. 2006;43:86–91.PubMedCrossRef Yeazel MW. Lindstrom Bremer KM, Center BA. A validated tool for gaining insight into clinicians’ preventive medicine behaviors and beliefs: the preventive medicine attitudes and activities questionnaire (PMAAQ). Prev Med. 2006;43:86–91.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. for the Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.PubMedCrossRef Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. for the Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Screening Colonoscopy in the US: Attitudes and Practices of Primary Care Physicians
Authors
Jane Zapka, ScD
Carrie N. Klabunde, PhD
Stephen Taplin, MD, MPH
Gigi Yuan, MS
David Ransohoff, MD
Sarah Kobrin, PhD, MPH
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2051-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2012 Go to the issue

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

No Loneliness on His Face

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.