Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Scoliosis | Original Article

Brace treatment for scoliosis secondary to chiari malformation type 1 or syringomyelia without neurosurgical intervention: A matched comparison with idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: Tianyuan Zhang, Hongda Bao, Xin Zhang, Shibin Shu, Zhen Liu, Xu Sun, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of brace treatment in patients with Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) or syringomyelia associated scoliosis without neurosurgical intervention.

Methods

This was a retrospective case–control study. 34 CM-1 or syringomyelia (CMS) patients who received brace treatment without neurosurgical intervention were recruited. Another 68 matched patients with idiopathic scoliosis who received bracing served as the control group. The matching criteria included gender, age (± 1 years), Risser sign (± 1 grade), initial curve magnitude (± 5°), curve patterns and follow-up time (± 6 months). Patients who encountered curve progression and scoliosis surgery were compared between different groups.

Results

Until the last visit, 16 (47%) patients in CMS group and 18 (26%) patients in IS group occurred curve progression; 9 (26%) patients and 15 (22%) patients underwent scoliosis surgery, respectively. Compared to idiopathic scoliosis, patients with CMS-associated scoliosis had a significantly higher rate of curve progression (P = 0.038). However, no significant difference was observed between two groups regarding to the rate of surgery (P = 0.867). Patients with combined CM-1 and syringomyelia had a higher rate of surgery than patients with isolated CM-1 or syringomyelia (P = 0.049). The double major curve pattern was identified as the risk factor for curve progression.

Conclusion

Brace treatment is effective for CMS-associated scoliosis without neurosurgical intervention. Compared to idiopathic scoliosis, brace can provide similar prevention for scoliosis surgery in CMS patients, but slight or moderate curve progression may occur. Specifically, patients with combined CM-1 and syringomyelia should be followed closely with a higher expectation of curve progression.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sponseller P, Bhimani M, Solacoff D, Dormans J (2000) Results of brace treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 25(18):2350–2354CrossRef Sponseller P, Bhimani M, Solacoff D, Dormans J (2000) Results of brace treatment of scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 25(18):2350–2354CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sha S, Zhu Z, Sun X, Zheng X, Liu Z, Wu T, Yan H, Qiu Y (2013) Effectiveness of brace treatment of Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis after posterior fossa decompression: a comparison with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38(5):E299–E305CrossRef Sha S, Zhu Z, Sun X, Zheng X, Liu Z, Wu T, Yan H, Qiu Y (2013) Effectiveness of brace treatment of Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis after posterior fossa decompression: a comparison with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38(5):E299–E305CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katz D, Durrani A (2001) Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(21):2354–2361CrossRef Katz D, Durrani A (2001) Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(21):2354–2361CrossRef
18.
Metadata
Title
Brace treatment for scoliosis secondary to chiari malformation type 1 or syringomyelia without neurosurgical intervention: A matched comparison with idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Tianyuan Zhang
Hongda Bao
Xin Zhang
Shibin Shu
Zhen Liu
Xu Sun
Yong Qiu
Zezhang Zhu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06958-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

European Spine Journal 12/2021 Go to the issue