Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Scoliosis | Protocol

Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Authors: James E. Archer, Charles Baird, Adrian Gardner, Alison B. Rushton, Nicola R. Heneghan

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of HR-QOL PROMs in adult scoliosis patients.

Methods

We will conduct a literature search, from their inception onwards, of multiple electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed. The searches will be performed in two stages. For both stages of the search, participants will be aged 18 and over with a diagnosis of scoliosis. The primary outcome of interest in the stage one searches will be studies which use PROMs to investigate HR-QOL as defined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy, the secondary outcome will be to assess the frequency of use of the various PROMs. In stage two, the primary outcome of interest will be studies which assess the measurement properties of the HR-QOL PROMs identified in stage one. No specific measurement property will be given priority. No planned secondary outcomes have been identified but will be reported if discovered. In stage one, the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of systematic reviews. In Stage two the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of full-text articles not available in the English language.
Two reviewers will independently screen all citations and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or risk of bias) will be appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the main text and tables to summarise and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the evidence for currently used PROMs in adult scoliosis patients and any areas that require further study.

Discussion

The review will help clinicians and researchers identify a HR-QOL PROM for use in patients with adult scoliosis. Findings from the review will be published and disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.

Systematic review registration

This systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), reference number: CRD42020219437
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2002. World Health Organisation. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2002.
5.
go back to reference Robin GC, Span Y, Steinberg R, Makin M, Menczel J. Scoliosis in the elderly: a follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1982;7:355–9.CrossRef Robin GC, Span Y, Steinberg R, Makin M, Menczel J. Scoliosis in the elderly: a follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1982;7:355–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kostuik JP, Bentivoglio J. The incidence of low-back pain in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1981;6:268–73.CrossRef Kostuik JP, Bentivoglio J. The incidence of low-back pain in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1981;6:268–73.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pérennou D, Marcelli C, Hérisson C, Simon L. Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1994;19:123–8.CrossRef Pérennou D, Marcelli C, Hérisson C, Simon L. Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1994;19:123–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. World Health Organisation Quality of Life. 2012. World Health Organisation. World Health Organisation Quality of Life. 2012.
15.
go back to reference Terran J, McHugh BJ, Fischer CR, Lonner B, Warren D, Glassman S, et al. Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up. Ochsner J. 2014;(14):14-22 Terran J, McHugh BJ, Fischer CR, Lonner B, Warren D, Glassman S, et al. Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up. Ochsner J. 2014;(14):14-22
18.
go back to reference Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Function Domain. Spine. 2006;31(5):593–7.CrossRef Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Function Domain. Spine. 2006;31(5):593–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1999;24:1435–40.CrossRef Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 1999;24:1435–40.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual; 2018, Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual; 2018,
24.
go back to reference PRISMA-P Group, Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.CrossRef PRISMA-P Group, Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Popay, Jennie & Roberts, Helen & Sowden, Amanda & Petticrew, Mark & Arai, Lisa & Rodgers, Mark & Britten, Nicky & Roen, Katrina & Duffy, Steven. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Swindon: ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council); 2006. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643. Popay, Jennie & Roberts, Helen & Sowden, Amanda & Petticrew, Mark & Arai, Lisa & Rodgers, Mark & Britten, Nicky & Roen, Katrina & Duffy, Steven. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Swindon: ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council); 2006. https://​doi.​org/​10.​13140/​2.​1.​1018.​4643.
36.
go back to reference International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. http://www.ICMJE.org ; 2020 Nov. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. http://​www.​ICMJE.​org ; 2020 Nov.
Metadata
Title
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Authors
James E. Archer
Charles Baird
Adrian Gardner
Alison B. Rushton
Nicola R. Heneghan
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Scoliosis
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue