Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 5/2018

Open Access 01-10-2018 | Research Article

Scan–rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers

Authors: Roel L. F. van der Palen, Arno A. W. Roest, Pieter J. van den Boogaard, Albert de Roos, Nico A. Blom, Jos J. M. Westenberg

Published in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to investigate scan–rescan reproducibility and observer variability of segmental aortic 3D systolic wall shear stress (WSS) by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers.

Materials and methods

Ten healthy volunteers (age 26.5 ± 2.6 years) underwent aortic 4D flow MRI twice. Maximum 3D systolic WSS (WSSmax) and mean 3D systolic WSS (WSSmean) for five thoracic aortic segments over five systolic cardiac phases by phase-specific segmentations were calculated. Scan–rescan analysis and observer reproducibility analysis were performed.

Results

Scan–rescan data showed overall good reproducibility for WSSmean (coefficient of variation, COV 10–15%) with moderate-to-strong intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 0.63–0.89). The variability in WSSmax was high (COV 16–31%) with moderate-to-good ICC (0.55–0.79) for different aortic segments. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was good-to-excellent for regional aortic WSSmax (ICC ≥ 0.78; COV ≤ 17%) and strong-to-excellent for WSSmean (ICC ≥ 0.86; COV ≤ 11%). In general, ascending aortic segments showed more WSSmax/WSSmean variability compared to aortic arch or descending aortic segments for scan–rescan, intraobserver and interobserver comparison.

Conclusions

Scan–rescan reproducibility was good for WSSmean and moderate for WSSmax for all thoracic aortic segments over multiple systolic phases in healthy volunteers. Intra/interobserver reproducibility for segmental WSS assessment was good-to-excellent. Variability of WSSmax is higher and should be taken into account in case of individual follow-up or in comparative rest–stress studies to avoid misinterpretation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Calkoen EE, Roest AA, Kroft LJ, van der Geest RJ, Jongbloed MR, van den Boogaard PJ, Blom NA, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Westenberg JJ (2015) Characterization and improved quantification of left ventricular inflow using streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 41(6):1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24735 CrossRefPubMed Calkoen EE, Roest AA, Kroft LJ, van der Geest RJ, Jongbloed MR, van den Boogaard PJ, Blom NA, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Westenberg JJ (2015) Characterization and improved quantification of left ventricular inflow using streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 41(6):1512–1520. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​24735 CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Scan–rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers
Authors
Roel L. F. van der Palen
Arno A. W. Roest
Pieter J. van den Boogaard
Albert de Roos
Nico A. Blom
Jos J. M. Westenberg
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0968-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1352-8661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-018-0688-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 5/2018 Go to the issue