Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2006

01-06-2006

Satisfaction With Care: An Independent Outcome Measure in Surgical Oncology

Authors: Kerry N. L. Avery, PhD, Chris Metcalfe, PhD, Joanna Nicklin, BSc, RGN, C. Paul Barham, MD, FRCS, Derek Alderson, MD, FRCS, Jenny L. Donovan, PhD, Jane M. Blazeby, MD, FRCS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Outcomes for treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer traditionally include procedure-related morbidity and mortality and long-term survival. Patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction measures, add to standard end points, but associations between these factors are not fully understood. This study examined how patient satisfaction related to surgical morbidity, treatment type, and QOL outcomes after inpatient treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods

Consecutive patients who had completed treatment in one unit were invited to participate in this study and complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PATSAT32 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires within 2 months of discharge. Regression analyses examined relationships between satisfaction and surgical morbidity (major complications and type of treatment) and between satisfaction and QOL variables, adjusting for age and sex.

Results

During the study, 181 patients were treated, 162 were eligible, and 139 returned both questionnaires (response rate, 86%). Of the study sample, the treatment outcome was potential cure in 105 (67 esophagectomy and 38 D2 gastrectomy), and 34 received palliative treatment. Thirty-seven patients (27%) had major complications. Patients who received palliative treatment reported satisfaction and QOL scores similar to those of patients who received curative treatment. However, patients who experienced major morbidity reported significantly worse QOL than those without morbidity (P < .01). Satisfaction scores were the same in patients with or without complications. There were no associations between satisfaction and QOL scores (r < .34).

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction with hospital care is independent of morbidity, treatment type, and QOL outcomes. It may be used to feed back information to providers of health care to improve patients’ experiences of treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference The American Society of Clinical Oncology. Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:671–9 The American Society of Clinical Oncology. Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:671–9
2.
go back to reference de Boer AGEM, van Lanschot JJB, van Sandick JW, et al. Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4202–8CrossRefPubMed de Boer AGEM, van Lanschot JJB, van Sandick JW, et al. Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4202–8CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Homs MY, Steyerberg EW, Eijkenboom WM, et al. Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364:1497–504CrossRefPubMed Homs MY, Steyerberg EW, Eijkenboom WM, et al. Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364:1497–504CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Sanford E, Falk SJ, et al. Health-related quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for localized esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 2005;103:1791–9CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Sanford E, Falk SJ, et al. Health-related quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for localized esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 2005;103:1791–9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zieren HU, Zippel K, Zieren J, et al. Quality of life after surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg 1998;164:119–25PubMedCrossRef Zieren HU, Zippel K, Zieren J, et al. Quality of life after surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg 1998;164:119–25PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:1781–7CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:1781–7CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1829–43CrossRefPubMed Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1829–43CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby J, et al. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 2005;41:2120–31CrossRefPubMed Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby J, et al. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 2005;41:2120–31CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Borras JM, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M, et al. Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2001;322:826–31 Borras JM, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M, et al. Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2001;322:826–31
10.
go back to reference Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1–244PubMed Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1–244PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kavadas V, Barham CP, Finch-Jones MD, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:719–23CrossRefPubMed Kavadas V, Barham CP, Finch-Jones MD, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:719–23CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Nicklin J, Brookes ST, Winstone K, Alderson D. The feasibility of quality of life assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:497–501CrossRefPubMed Blazeby JM, Nicklin J, Brookes ST, Winstone K, Alderson D. The feasibility of quality of life assessment in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:497–501CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76PubMed Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76PubMed
14.
go back to reference Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels: Quality of Life Unit, EORTC Data Centre, 1995 Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels: Quality of Life Unit, EORTC Data Centre, 1995
15.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:609–20CrossRefPubMed Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:609–20CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M. The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 1997;35:714–30CrossRefPubMed Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M. The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 1997;35:714–30CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Walker MS, Ristvedt SL, Haughey BH. Patient care in multidisciplinary cancer clinics: does attention to psychosocial needs predict patient satisfaction? Psychooncology 2003;12:291–300CrossRefPubMed Walker MS, Ristvedt SL, Haughey BH. Patient care in multidisciplinary cancer clinics: does attention to psychosocial needs predict patient satisfaction? Psychooncology 2003;12:291–300CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer-patients. Cancer 1990;65:186–92PubMed Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer-patients. Cancer 1990;65:186–92PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al. Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients’ satisfaction. Oncology 2001;61:120–8CrossRefPubMed Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al. Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients’ satisfaction. Oncology 2001;61:120–8CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:351–4CrossRefPubMed Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:351–4CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–9CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–9CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–95PubMed Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–95PubMed
Metadata
Title
Satisfaction With Care: An Independent Outcome Measure in Surgical Oncology
Authors
Kerry N. L. Avery, PhD
Chris Metcalfe, PhD
Joanna Nicklin, BSc, RGN
C. Paul Barham, MD, FRCS
Derek Alderson, MD, FRCS
Jenny L. Donovan, PhD
Jane M. Blazeby, MD, FRCS
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.08.019

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2006 Go to the issue