Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 2/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

Safety of carotid stenting for stroke prevention: need of an independent outcome assessor

Authors: S. Lanfranconi, A. Bersano, E. D’Adda, E. Ballabio, M. Gattinoni, C. Cinnante, P. Nuzzi, M. Isalberti, V. Branca, L. Candelise

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting have still to be fully established. We propose a standardized registry of carotid artery stenting in use at our hospital to evaluate whether the presence of an independent neurologist performing basal, procedural and post-procedural observation increases the accuracy of outcome assessment. We collected a cohort of patients receiving carotid stenting. An external neurologist supervised the endovascular intervention and monitored the patient’s clinical conditions during procedure and follow-up time (12 months). The procedure was carried out successfully in all cases. We registered two intra-procedural strokes and two strokes within 24 h. The risk of major complications in our study was 9.1% at 30 days. Our complication rate is higher than in previous studies. These findings could be partly explained by the unemployment of distal protection devices, but also by the presence of an independent observer that might have increased the accuracy of neurological evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB (1999) Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, Art. No. CD001081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001081 Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB (1999) Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3, Art. No. CD001081. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001081
3.
go back to reference Fayad P (2007) Endarterectomy and stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis a race at breakneck speed. Stroke 38(Part 2):707–714PubMedCrossRef Fayad P (2007) Endarterectomy and stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis a race at breakneck speed. Stroke 38(Part 2):707–714PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickman NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K, Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) Investigators (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickman NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K, Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) Investigators (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2007) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4, Art. No. CD000515. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub3 Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2007) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4, Art. No. CD000515. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD000515.​pub3
6.
go back to reference The SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef The SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef
7.
go back to reference EVA 3S investigators (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671CrossRef EVA 3S investigators (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870PubMed Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870PubMed
9.
go back to reference Rankin J (1957) Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II Prognosis. Scott Med J 2:200–215PubMed Rankin J (1957) Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II Prognosis. Scott Med J 2:200–215PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R et al for the ARCHeR Trial Collaborators (2006) Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44:258–269 Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R et al for the ARCHeR Trial Collaborators (2006) Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: The ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44:258–269
11.
go back to reference Collins R, MacMahon S (2001) Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials. Lancet 357:373–380PubMedCrossRef Collins R, MacMahon S (2001) Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trials. Lancet 357:373–380PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference MacMahon S, Collins R (2001) Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, II: observational studies. Lancet 357:455–462PubMedCrossRef MacMahon S, Collins R (2001) Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, II: observational studies. Lancet 357:455–462PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Safety of carotid stenting for stroke prevention: need of an independent outcome assessor
Authors
S. Lanfranconi
A. Bersano
E. D’Adda
E. Ballabio
M. Gattinoni
C. Cinnante
P. Nuzzi
M. Isalberti
V. Branca
L. Candelise
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0012-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Neurological Sciences 2/2009 Go to the issue