Published in:
01-02-2019 | Original Article
Safety and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy versus upfront surgery for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Authors:
Takanori Kurogochi, Michitaka Honda, Kotaro Yamashita, Masaru Hayami, Akihiko Okamura, Yu Imamura, Shinji Mine, Masayuki Watanabe
Published in:
Surgery Today
|
Issue 2/2019
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy has become a standard treatment for esophageal squamous cancer (ESCC) in Japan. We used propensity-matching analysis to clarify the safety and efficacy of NAC in daily clinical practice.
Methods
We reviewed the medical records of 335 patients with clinical Stage II/III ESCC diagnosed between 2007 and 2012, including 191 who received preoperative NAC (NAC group) and 144 treated by upfront surgery (US group). After propensity score matching, there were 118 patients in each group. We compared the postoperative complications and long-term outcomes between the groups.
Results
Seven patients in the NAC group underwent replacement therapy. Complications occurred in 76 (68.5%) and 76 (64.4%) patients in NAC and US groups, respectively (p = 0.51), and severe complications occurred in 17 (22.4%) and 30 (39.5%) patients, respectively (p = 0.057). One (0.8%) and three patients (2.5%) from the US group died within 30 days and 90 days after surgery, respectively, but none of the patients from the NAC group died within the same period. The 5-year survival rate was 54.9% in the NAC group and 41.2% in the US group (p = 0.024).
Conclusions
NAC is a safe and effective treatment to improve prognosis in the clinical setting.