Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Rhinoplasty | Innovative Techniques

Definition of “Gender Angle” in Caucasian Population

Authors: Mauro Barone, Annalisa Cogliandro, Rosa Salzillo, Emile List, Vincenzo Panasiti, Stefania Tenna, Paolo Persichetti

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The goal of this study report is to define the “gender angle,” a new angle which represents the masculine or feminine nasal shape, for performing a gender-oriented rhinoplasty. The use of the “gender angle” in Caucasian patients will help the plastic surgeon in the search for a suitable nose for the patient’s face and above all for the search for maximum patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods

The study population was obtained from Caucasian patients who had undergone rhinoplasty between January 1986 and September 2016 at our department. Patients answered the Italian version of the FACE-Q outcome instrument on post-rhinoplasty satisfaction with their nose. Anthropometric measurements were taken retrospectively by AutoCAD for MAC on a photograph of the profile view taken postoperatively at the last follow-up.

Results

A total of 1774 (706 male and 1068 female) patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and were finally enrolled in this study. We identified a gender-specific angle ranging from 168° to 182° for the male nose and from 160° to 178° for the female nose. We subdivided all study patients into 3 ranges of angles as follows: male nose, range 1 = 168°–172°, range 2 = 173°–177°, range 3 = 178°–182°; female nose, range 1 = 160°–166°, range 2 = 167°–171°, range 3 = 172°–178°. All study patients completed the FACE-Q rhinoplasty postoperative module. Analysis was performed of the FACE-Q results and the angle obtained for each nose. The most satisfactory angle range for male patients was range 3 (P = 0.01) and for the female patients was range 2 (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

The “gender angle” might be a parameter that effectively provides the optimal cosmetic result for male and female patients who undergo rhinoplasty.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors - www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1078e–1079eCrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1078e–1079eCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2015) FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:272–273CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2015) FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:272–273CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cogliandro A, Barone M, Persichetti P (2017) Italian linguistic validation of the FACE-Q instrument. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(4):336–337CrossRef Cogliandro A, Barone M, Persichetti P (2017) Italian linguistic validation of the FACE-Q instrument. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(4):336–337CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) Role of rhinoplasty in transsexual patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 41(3):700–713 Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) Role of rhinoplasty in transsexual patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 41(3):700–713
6.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Rhinoplasty: a cross cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):664e–665eCrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Rhinoplasty: a cross cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):664e–665eCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Aronica R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) Linguistic validation of the “FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module” in Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(3):1771–1772CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Aronica R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) Linguistic validation of the “FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module” in Italian. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(3):1771–1772CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(1):27–35CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(1):27–35CrossRef
9.
go back to reference DiBernardo BE, Adams RL, Krause J, Fiorillo MA, Gheradini G (1998) Photographic standards in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:559–568CrossRef DiBernardo BE, Adams RL, Krause J, Fiorillo MA, Gheradini G (1998) Photographic standards in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:559–568CrossRef
10.
go back to reference DiSaia JP, Ptak JJ, Achauer BM (1998) Digital photography for the plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:569–573CrossRef DiSaia JP, Ptak JJ, Achauer BM (1998) Digital photography for the plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:569–573CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Swier P, Manson PN, Vander Kolk CA (2000) Converting to digital photography: a model for a large group or academic practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:119–124CrossRef Galdino GM, Swier P, Manson PN, Vander Kolk CA (2000) Converting to digital photography: a model for a large group or academic practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:119–124CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Galdino GM, Vogel JE, Vander Kolk CA (2001) Standardizing digital photography: it’s not all in the eye of the beholder. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1334–1344CrossRef Galdino GM, Vogel JE, Vander Kolk CA (2001) Standardizing digital photography: it’s not all in the eye of the beholder. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1334–1344CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krause JL (2003) Digital photographic standards. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1177–1178CrossRef Krause JL (2003) Digital photographic standards. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1177–1178CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Price MA, Goldstein GD (1997) The use of a digital imaging system in a dermatology surgery practice. Dermatol Surg 23:31–32PubMed Price MA, Goldstein GD (1997) The use of a digital imaging system in a dermatology surgery practice. Dermatol Surg 23:31–32PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rhodes ND, Southern SJ (2002) Digital operation notes: a useful addition to the written record. Ann Plast Surg 48:571–573CrossRef Rhodes ND, Southern SJ (2002) Digital operation notes: a useful addition to the written record. Ann Plast Surg 48:571–573CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yavuzer R, Smirnes S, Jackson IT (2001) Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 46:293–300CrossRef Yavuzer R, Smirnes S, Jackson IT (2001) Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 46:293–300CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Springer IN, Zernial O, Nölke F, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, Terheyden H, Wolfart S (2008) Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:629–637CrossRef Springer IN, Zernial O, Nölke F, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, Terheyden H, Wolfart S (2008) Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:629–637CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Morrison SD, Vyas KS, Motakef S, Gast KM, Chung MT, Rashidi V, Satterwhite T, Kuzon W, Cederna PS (2016) Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1759–1770CrossRef Morrison SD, Vyas KS, Motakef S, Gast KM, Chung MT, Rashidi V, Satterwhite T, Kuzon W, Cederna PS (2016) Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1759–1770CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Habal MB (1990) Aesthetics of feminizing the male face by craniofacial contouring of the facial bones. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:143–150CrossRef Habal MB (1990) Aesthetics of feminizing the male face by craniofacial contouring of the facial bones. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:143–150CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hage JJ, Becking AG, de Graaf FH, Tuinzing DB (1997) Gender-confirming facial surgery: considerations on the masculinity and femininity of faces. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1799–1807CrossRef Hage JJ, Becking AG, de Graaf FH, Tuinzing DB (1997) Gender-confirming facial surgery: considerations on the masculinity and femininity of faces. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1799–1807CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dempf R, Eckert AW (2010) Contouring the forehead and rhinoplasty in the feminization of the face in male-to-female trans-sexuals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:416–422CrossRef Dempf R, Eckert AW (2010) Contouring the forehead and rhinoplasty in the feminization of the face in male-to-female trans-sexuals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:416–422CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Noureai SA, Randhawa P, Andrews PJ, Saleh HA (2007) The role of nasal feminization rhinoplasty in male-to-female gender reassignment. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:318–320PubMed Noureai SA, Randhawa P, Andrews PJ, Saleh HA (2007) The role of nasal feminization rhinoplasty in male-to-female gender reassignment. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:318–320PubMed
25.
go back to reference Altman K (2012) Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:885–894CrossRef Altman K (2012) Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:885–894CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bartlett SP, Wornom I III, Whitaker LA (1991) Evaluation of facial skeletal aesthetics and surgical planning. Clin Plast Surg 18:1–9CrossRef Bartlett SP, Wornom I III, Whitaker LA (1991) Evaluation of facial skeletal aesthetics and surgical planning. Clin Plast Surg 18:1–9CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Carvalho B, Ballin AC, Becker RV, Berger CA, Hurtado JG, Mocellin M (2012) Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 16:445–451PubMedPubMedCentral Carvalho B, Ballin AC, Becker RV, Berger CA, Hurtado JG, Mocellin M (2012) Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 16:445–451PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Choi YD, Kim Y, Park E (2017) Patient-specific augmentation rhinoplasty using a three-dimensional simulation program and three-dimensional printing. Aesthet Surg J 37(9):988–998CrossRef Choi YD, Kim Y, Park E (2017) Patient-specific augmentation rhinoplasty using a three-dimensional simulation program and three-dimensional printing. Aesthet Surg J 37(9):988–998CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Berger CA, Freitas Rda S, Malafaia O, Pinto JS, Macedo Filho ED, Mocellin M, Fagundes MS (2015) Prospective study of the surgical techniques used in primary rhinoplasty on the Caucasian nose and comparison of the preoperative and postoperative anthropometric nose measurements. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 19:34–41PubMed Berger CA, Freitas Rda S, Malafaia O, Pinto JS, Macedo Filho ED, Mocellin M, Fagundes MS (2015) Prospective study of the surgical techniques used in primary rhinoplasty on the Caucasian nose and comparison of the preoperative and postoperative anthropometric nose measurements. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 19:34–41PubMed
Metadata
Title
Definition of “Gender Angle” in Caucasian Population
Authors
Mauro Barone
Annalisa Cogliandro
Rosa Salzillo
Emile List
Vincenzo Panasiti
Stefania Tenna
Paolo Persichetti
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01366-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2019 Go to the issue